Article published in:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2009Edited by Bert Botma and Jacqueline van Kampen
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 26] 2009
► pp. 78–90
Lexically bound mouth actions in Sign Language of the Netherlands
A comparison between different registers and age groups
Inge van de Sande | Radboud University Nijmegen
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 27 October 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.26.08san
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.26.08san
Full-text
Lexically bound mouth actions in Sign Language of the NetherlandsCited by
Cited by 6 other publications
Bank, Richard
2015. The ubiquity of mouthings in NGT: A corpus study.
Sign Language & Linguistics 18:2 ► pp. 257 ff. 
Bank, Richard, Onno Crasborn & Roeland van Hout
2015. Alignment of two languages: The spreading of mouthings in Sign Language of the Netherlands.
International Journal of Bilingualism 19:1 ► pp. 40 ff.
CRASBORN, ONNO & ELS VAN DER KOOIJ
2013. The phonology of focus in Sign Language of the Netherlands.
Journal of Linguistics 49:3 ► pp. 515 ff.
Krason, Anna, Rebecca Fenton, Rosemary Varley & Gabriella Vigliocco
2021. The role of iconic gestures and mouth movements in face-to-face communication.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Perniss, Pamela, David Vinson & Gabriella Vigliocco
2020. Making Sense of the Hands and Mouth: The Role of “Secondary” Cues to Meaning in British Sign Language and English.
Cognitive Science 44:7
WOLL, BENCIE & MAIRÉAD MACSWEENEY
2016. Let's not forget the role of deafness in sign/speech bilingualism.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19:2 ► pp. 253 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.