Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2014
Edited by Anita Auer and Björn Köhnlein
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 31] 2014
► pp. 107–128

Article choice in children with High Functioning Autism (HFA) and in children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI)

| University of Amsterdam
This study reports on the choice between a definite and an indefinite article by children with High Functioning Autism (HFA) and children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI). We carried out an elicited production task with 16 Dutch-speaking non-grammatically impaired children with HFA aged 6–13, 16 age-matched Dutch-speaking children with SLI, and 16 typically developing (TD) age controls. The results in the indefinite conditions reveal virtually no errors across groups. However, in the definite condition the HFA group, but NOT the SLI group, incorrectly produces indefinite articles significantly more often than the TD group. A more detailed analysis shows that 38% (6/16) of the children with HFA vs. 13% (2/16) of the children with SLI regularly produce indefinite articles in definite contexts. We propose that these children do not always calculate the additional (pragmatic) meaning of indefinites derived by scalar implicature (Horn 2006). Furthermore, development by age in the SLI group, but NOT in the HFA group, suggests that the failure to draw a scalar implicature is more persistent in children with HFA than in children with SLI. Concluding, our results show that non-grammatically impaired children with HFA are more prone to pragmatic impairments than children with SLI, suggesting a dissociation between grammar and pragmatics.
Keywords: Article choice, definiteness, Scalar Implicature, autism, SLI
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 10 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.31.09sch
References (55)
Abbott, Barbara. 1999. Support for a unique theory of definiteness. In Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovitch (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 91, 1–15. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
. 2003. A reply to Szabó’s “Descriptions and uniqueness”. Philosophical Studies 113(3). 223–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, Simon. 1988. Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 18(3). 379–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bishop, Dorothy V.M. 1997. Uncommon understanding: Development and disorders of language comprehension in children. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Boucher, Jill. 2009. The autistic spectrum: Characteristics, causes and practical issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 1998. Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature. In Robyn Carston & Sachico Uschida (eds.), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications, 79–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2004. Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. Structures and Beyond 31. 39–103.Google Scholar
Chondrogianni, Vicky & Theo Marinis. In press. Production of definite and indefinite articles in typically developing English-speaking children and children with SLI. Lingua: Special Issue on the Acquisition of Reference and Referentiality.
Colle, Livia, Simon Baron-Cohen & Jaqueline Hill. 2007. Do children with autism have a theory of mind? A non-verbal test of autism vs. specific language impairment. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 37(4). 716–723. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen & Rosalind Thornton. 2000. Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eigsti, Inge-Marie, Ashley B. de Marchena, Jillin M. Schuh & Elizabeth Kelley. 2011. Language acquisition in autism spectrum disorders: A developmental review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 5(2). 681–691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Naama & Rama Novogrodsky. 2008. Subtypes of SLI: SySLI, PhoSLI, LeSLI, and PraSLI. In Anna Gavarró & Maria João Freitas (eds), Language Acquisition and Development, 205–217. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press/CSP.Google Scholar
. 2011. Which questions are most difficult to understand? The comprehension of Wh-questions in three subtypes of SLI. Lingua 121(3). 367–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frith, Uta. 1989. Autism: Explaining the enigma. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 31. 465–468.Google Scholar
Geurts, Hilde M. 2007. CCC-2-NL: Children’s Communication Checklist-2. Amsterdam: Harcourt Assessment B.V.Google Scholar
Gordishevsky, Galina & Sergey Avrutin. 2004. Optional omissions in an optionally null subject language. In Jaqueline van Kampen & Sergio Baauw (eds.), Proceedings of GALA 2003, Vol. 11, 187–198.Utrecht University: LOT Occasional series 3.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1991. On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics 271. 405–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite NPs. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
Hendriks, Petra, Helen de Hoop, Irene Krämer, Henriëtte E. de Swart & Joost Zwarts. 2010. Conflicts in Interpretation (Advances in Optimality Theory). London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Henry, Lucy A., David J. Messer & Gilly Nash. 2012. Executive functioning in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 53(1). 37–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. Toward a Fregean pragmatics: Voraussetzung, Nebengedanke, Andeutung. In Laurence R. Horn & Istvan Kecskes (eds.), Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Intercultural Aspects, 39–69. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Van Hout, Angeliek, Kaitlyn Harrigan, & Jill de Villiers. 2010. Asymmetries in the acquisition of definite and indefinite NPs. Lingua 120(8). 1973–1990. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, Tania R. & Kenneth N. Wexler. 2003. The certain uses of the in L2-English. In Juana. M. Liceras, Helmut Zobl & Helen Goodluck (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference, 150–160. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania, Heejeong Ko & Kenneth Wexler. 2004. Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition 12(1). 3–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, Tania, Maria L. Zubizarreta & Salvador B. Maldonado. 2008. Sources of linguistic knowledge in the second language acquisition of English articles. Lingua 118(4). 554–576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, Annette. 1979. A functional approach to child language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Lely, Heather K.J. 1998. SLI in children: Movement, economy and deficits in the computational-syntactic system. Language Acquisition 71. 161–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Lely, Heather K.J. & Linda Stollwerck. 1997. Binding theory and grammatical specific language impairment in children. Cognition 62(3). 245–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, Laurence B. 1998. Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loukusa, Soile & Irma Moilanen. 2009. Pragmatic inference abilities in individuals with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. A review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 3(4). 890–904. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maratsos, Michael. P. 1976. The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children: An experimental study of semantic acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perovic, Alexandra, Nadya Modyanova & Kenneth Wexler. 2013a. Comprehension of reflexive and personal pronouns in children with autism: A syntactic or pragmatic deficit? Applied Psycholinguistics 34(4). 813–835. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. Comparison of grammar in neurodevelopmental disorders: The case of binding in Williams syndrome and autism with and without language impairment. Language Acquisition 20(2). 133–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polite, Elgustus J., Laurence B. Leonard & Felicia D. Roberts. 2011. The use of definite and indefinite articles by children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 131. 291–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pouscoulous, Nausicaa, Ira A. Noveck, Guy Politzer & Anne Bastide. 2007. A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production. Language Acquisition 14(4). 347–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Premack, David & Guy Woodruff. 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a ‘theory of mind’? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41. 515–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, Mabel L. 1996. Toward a genetics of a language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rispens, Judith & Anne Baker 2012. Nonword repetition: The relative contributions of phonological short-term memory and phonological representations in children with language and hearing impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 55(3). 683–694. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1905. On denoting. Mind 141. 479–493. Reference is to the reprint in Al P. Martinich (ed.), 1996. The Philosophy of Language, 1996. Third edition, 199-207. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, Jeannette, Aviya Hacohen & Arielle Bernstein. 2003. On the acquisition of DP in English-speaking children with SLI. In Barbara Beachley, Amanda Brown, Frances Colin (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Boston University Conference on Language Development 21, 716–726. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, Jeannette & Lisa Matthewson. 2005. Grammar and pragmatics in the acquisition of article systems. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23(1). 53–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schafer, Robin J. & Jill de Villiers. 2000. Imagining articles: What a and the can tell us about the emergence of DP. In S. Catherine Howell, Sarah A. Fish, Thea Keith-Lucas (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 21, 609–620. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Semel, Eleanor M., Elisabeth H. Wiig, Wayne A. Secord & Willem Kort. 2008. CELF® 4 NL: Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals: Nederlandse versie. Pearson.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Milton K. Munitz & Peter Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy, 197–214. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
1978. Assertion. In Peter Cole (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, 313–332. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tager-Flusberg, Helen. 1989. A psycholinguistic perspective on language development in the autistic child. In Geraldine Dawson (ed.), Autism: Nature, diagnosis, and treatment, 92–115. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Tallal, Paula, Randal Ross & Susan Curtiss. 1989. Unexpected sex-ratios in families of language/learning-impaired children. Neuropsychologia 271. 987–998. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Julie L., Melissa L. McPheeters, Nila A. Sathe, Dwayne Dove, Jeremy Veenstra-Van der Weele & Zachary Warren. 2012. A systematic review of vocational interventions for young adults with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics 130(3). 531–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomblin, Bruce 1989. Familial concentration of developmental language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 541. 287–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, Marit R. 2008. Verb movement and subject placement in the acquisition of word order: Pragmatics or structural economy? In Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes, María P. Larranaga & John. Clibbens (eds.), First Language Acquisition of Morphology and Syntax, 61–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Dan & Deirdre Sperber. 2004. Experimental pragmatics. In Frank Jackson & Michael Smith (eds.), Handbook of Contemporary Analytical Philosophy, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zehler, Annette M. & William F. Brewer. 1982. Sequence and principles in article system use: An examination of a, the, and null acquisition. Child Development 531. 1268–1274.Google Scholar
Zdorenko, Tatiana & Johanne Paradis. 2008. The acquisition of articles in child second language English: Fluctuation, transfer or both? Second Language Research 24(2). 227–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

MEIR, Natalia & Rama NOVOGRODSKY
2023. Referential expressions in monolingual and bilingual children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): A study of informativeness and definiteness. Journal of Child Language 50:2 ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Peristeri, Eleni & Ianthi Maria Tsimpli
2023. Disentangling Language Disorder and Bilingualism in Children with Developmental Language Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder: Evidence from Writing. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 53:12 ► pp. 4497 ff. DOI logo
Schroeder, Kristen, Joana Rosselló, Teresa Ribalta Torrades & Wolfram Hinzen
2023. Linguistic markers of autism spectrum conditions in narratives: A comprehensive analysis. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments 8 ► pp. 239694152311685 ff. DOI logo
Bloem, Jelke, Arjen Versloot & Fred Weerman
2017. Verbal cluster order and processing complexity. Language Sciences 60 ► pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Keydeniers, Darlene, Jeanne Eliazer & Jeannette Schaeffer
2017. Definite-indefinite article choice development in Dutch child language. Linguistics in the Netherlands 34 ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Schaeffer, Jeannette
2017. Unravelling the complexity of Direct Object Scrambling. Language Sciences 60 ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Schaeffer, Jeannette
2018. Linguistic and Cognitive Abilities in Children with Specific Language Impairment as Compared to Children with High-Functioning Autism. Language Acquisition 25:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. How the Core Deficits Affect Language Acquisition and Linguistic Comprehension. In Cutting-Edge Language and Literacy Tools for Students on the Autism Spectrum [Advances in Early Childhood and K-12 Education, ], ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.