Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2014
Edited by Anita Auer and Björn Köhnlein
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 31] 2014
► pp. 129144
Adani, Flavia, Heather K.J. van der Lely, Matteo Forgiarini & Maria Teresa Guasti
2010Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian children. Lingua 1201. 2148–2166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avrutin, Sergey
2000Comprehension of Wh-questions by children and Broca’s aphasics. In Yosef Grodzinsky, Lewis P. Shapiro & Dan A. Swinney (eds.), Language and the Brain: Representation and Processing, 295–312. San Diego: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bornkessel, Ina, Matthias Schlesewsky & Angela Friederici
2003Contextual information modulates initial processes of syntactic integration: The role of inter- versus intrasentential predictions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 291. 871–882. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deevy, Patricia & Lawrence B. Leonard
2004The comprehension of WH-questions in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing 471. 802–815. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1970Discourse agreement: How children answer questions. In John R. Hayes (ed.), Cognition and Development of Language, 76–106. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Frazier, Lyn & Giovanni B. Flores d’Arcais
1989Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 281. 31–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Naama, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi
2009Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 1191. 67–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Naama & Rama Novogrodsky
2011Which questions are most difficult to understand? The comprehension of wh-questions in three subtypes of SLI. Lingua 1211. 367–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1983Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study, 5–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, Teresa, Chiara Branchini & Fabrizio Arosio
2012Interference in the production of Italian subject and object wh-questions. Applied Psycholinguistics 331. 185–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickok, Gregory & Sergey Avrutin
1996Comprehension of wh-questions in two Broca’s aphasics. Brain and Language 521. 314–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hollebrandse, Bart
2004Topichood and quantification in L1 Dutch. International Review of Applied Linguistics Teaching 421. 203–2015.Google Scholar
Jakubowicz, Celia
2011Measuring derivational complexity: New evidence from typically developing and SLI learners of L1 French. Lingua 1211. 339–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, Heather & COST Consortium
2010How do 5-year-olds understand questions: Differences in languages across Europe. Presented at Let the children speak: Learning of critical language skills across 25 Languages , Wellcome Trust Conference Center, London.
van der Meer, Matthijs, Wouter van Atteveldt, Peter Coopmans & William Philip
2001Subject-object asymmetry in Dutch children’s comprehension of wie-questions. In Ton van der Wouden & Hans Broekhuis (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 20011, 167–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meng, Michael, Markus Bader & Joseph Bayer
1999Die Verarbeitung von Subjekt–Objekt Ambiguitäten im Kontext [The processing of subject-object ambiguities in context]. In Ipke Wachsmuth & Bernhard Jung (eds.), Proceedings der 4. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Kognitionswissenschaft, 244–249. St. Augustin: Infix Verlag.Google Scholar
Metz, Marijke, Angeliek van Hout & Heather van der Lely
2010Dutch children’s processing of wh-questions: Comprehension of who and which-questions in five- to nine-year-old children. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik (GAGL) 511. 27–41. [URL] Google Scholar
2012Subject interpretation of object questions by Dutch 5-year-olds: The role of number agreement in comprehension. In Marion Elenbaas & Suzanne Aalberse (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 20121, 97–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philip, William, Peter Coopmans, Wouter van Atteveldt & Matthijs van der Meer
2001Subject-object asymmetry in child comprehension of Wh-questions. In Anna H.-J. Do, Laura Dominguez & Aimee Johansen (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th BUCLD, 587–598. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Schouwenaars, Atty, Angeliek van Hout & Petra Hendriks
2014Word order overrules number agreement: Dutch children’s interpretation and production of which-questions. In Chia-Ying Chu, Caitlin E. Coughlin, Beatriz Lopez Prego, Utako Minai & Annie Tremblay (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 5th Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2012), 60–71. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Spenader, Jennifer, Erik-Jan Smits & Petra Hendriks
2009Coherent discourse solves the pronoun interpretation problem. Journal of Child Language 36(1). 23–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Jean & Hermine Sinclair
(1975) Comprehension of questions by children between 5 and 9. Linguistics 1511. 17–26.Google Scholar
Stowe, Laurie
1986Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognition Processes 11. 227–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strangmann, Iris & Angeliek van Hout
In progress. Context and the acquisition of Dutch object which-questions. Ms., University of Groningen.
Trueswell, John, Irina Sekerina, Nicole M. Hill & Marian L. Logrip
1999The kindergartenpath-effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition 731. 89–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Vincenzi, Marica, Lisa S. Arduino, Laura Ciccarelli & Remo Job
1999Parsing strategies in children comprehension of interrogative sentences. In Sebastiano Bagnara (ed.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Science, 301–308. Rome: Instituto di Psicologia del CNR.Google Scholar
Wubs, Ellis, Petra Hendriks, John Hoeks & Charlotte Koster
2009Tell me a story! Children’s capacity for topic shift. In Jean Crawford, Koichi Otaki & Masahiko Takahashi (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 3), 313–324. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Sauerland, Uli, Kleanthes K. Grohmann, Maria Teresa Guasti, Darinka Anđelković, Reili Argus, Sharon Armon-Lotem, Fabrizio Arosio, Larisa Avram, João Costa, Ineta Dabašinskienė, Kristine de López, Daniela Gatt, Helen Grech, Ewa Haman, Angeliek van Hout, Gordana Hrzica, Judith Kainhofer, Laura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė, Sari Kunnari, Melita Kovačević, Jelena Kuvac Kraljević, Katarzyna Lipowska, Sandrine Mejias, Maša Popović, Jurate Ruzaite, Maja Savić, Anca Sevcenco, Spyridoula Varlokosta, Marina Varnava & Kazuko Yatsushiro
2016. How do 5-year-olds understand questions? Differences in languages across Europe. First Language 36:3  pp. 169 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.