Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2016
Edited by Jenny Audring and Sander Lestrade
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 33] 2016
► pp. 89105
Barbiers, Sjef
2013 “Dummy auxiliaries in Dutch dialects, L1 and L2 acquisition”. Dummy auxiliaries in first and second language acquisition ed. by E. Blom, I. van de Craats and J. Verhagen, 395–416. Boston/Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boogaart, Ronny
1999Aspect and temporal ordering: A contrastive analysis of Dutch and English. PhD diss., Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.Google Scholar
Broekhuis, H.
2013 “The syntactic analysis of the Dutch absentive construction”. Nederlandse Taalkunde 18:1. 87–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic structures. The Hague: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, L.
1994 “Syntactic Variation in Heerlen Dutch”. Germanic Generative Syntax Newsletter 10:2.5–6.Google Scholar
de Groot, Casper
2000 “The absentive”. Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe ed. by Ö. Dahl, 693–719. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L.
2013 “The syntax of registers: diary subject omission and the privilege of the root”. Lingua 1301.88–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merchant, J.
2004 “Fragments and ellipsis”. Linguistics and philosophy 271.661–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ott, D.
2014 “An ellipsis approach to contrastive left-dislocation”. Linguistic Inquiry 451.269–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ott, D. & M. de Vries
2016 “Right dislocation as deletion”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 341.641–690. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stowell, T.
1982 “The tense of infinitives”. Linguistic Inquiry 131.561–570.Google Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter
2014 “The tense of infinitives in Dutch”. Black Book. A Festschrift in honor of Frans Zwarts ed. by J. Hoeksema and D. Gilbers, 363–387. Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar