Article published in:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2016
Edited by Jenny Audring and Sander Lestrade
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 33] 2016
► pp. 106120

Full-text

Voicing distinctions in the Dutch-German dialect continuum
References

References

Alphen, P. M. van & R. Smits
2004 “Acoustical and perceptual analysis of the voicing distinction in Dutch initial plosives: the role of prevoicing”. Journal of Phonetics 32:4.455–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alphen, Petra M. van.
2007 “Prevoicing in Dutch initial plosives. Production, perception and word recognition”. Voicing in Dutch. (De)voicing – phonology, phonetics and psycholinguistics ed. by J. van de Weijer and E. J. van der Torre, 99–124. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Avery, Peter & William J. Idsardi
2001 “Laryngeal dimensions, completion and enhancement”. Distinctive feature theory ed. by T. A. Hall, 41–70. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, J., P. Helgason, B. McMurray & C. Ringen
2011 “Rate effects on Swedish VOT: evidence for phonological overspecification”. Journal of Phonetics 39.39–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, J., M. Jessen & C. Ringen
2013 “Empirical evidence for laryngeal features: aspirating vs. true voice languages”. Journal of Linguistics 49:2.259–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. & D. Weenink
2016 “Praat: doing phonetics by computer”. Version 6.0.12, http://​www​.praat​.org (24 January 2016).
[ p. 120 ]
Braun, Angelika
1996 “Zur regionalen Distribution van VOT im Deutschen”. Untersuchungen zur Stimme und Sprache ed. by A. Braun, 19–32. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, Eli.
1976 “Some data on North German stops and affricates”. Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics of the University of Copenhagen (ARIPUC) 10.149-200.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & K. Stevens
1971 “A note on laryngeal features”. Quarterly Progress Report of the Research Laboratory of Electronics 101.198–213.Google Scholar
Hamann, Silke R. & Klaas T. Seinhorst
2016Prevoicing in Standard German plosives: Implications for phonological representation? Poster presented at the 13th Old World Conference in Phonology, 15 January, Budapest.
Honeybone, Patrick
2005 “Diachronic evidence in segmental phonology: the case of obstruent laryngeal specifications”. The internal organisation of segments ed. by M. van Oostendorp and J. van de Weijer, 319–354. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, G. K. & J. C. Salmons
1995 “Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic”. Phonology 12.369–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 “Glottal spreading bias in Germanic”. Linguistische Berichte 178.135–151.Google Scholar
Jessen, M. & C. Ringen
2002 “Laryngeal features in German”. Phonology 19:2.189–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keating, P. A.
1984 “Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing”. Language 60:2.286–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindow, Wolfgang, Dieter Möhn, Hermann Niebaum, Dieter Stellmacher, Hans Taubken & Jan Wirrer
1998Niederdeutsche Grammatik. Leer: Verlag Schuster.Google Scholar
Lisker, L. & A. S. Abramson
1964 “A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustic measurements”. Word 20:3.384–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oostendorp, Marc van.
2007 “Exceptions to Final Devoicing”. Voicing in Dutch. (De)voicing – phonology, phonetics and psycholinguistics ed. by J. van de Weijer and E. J. van der Torre, 99–124. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wetzels, W. L. & J. Mascaró
2001 “The typology of voicing and devoicing”. Language 77:2.207–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar