Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2016
Edited by Jenny Audring and Sander Lestrade
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 33] 2016
► pp. 135–151

Object relative clauses in Dutch-speaking children with High-Functioning Autism (HFA)

| Universiteit van Amsterdam
| University of Amsterdam

Previous studies show that Direct Object Scrambling (DOS) is impaired in Dutch-speaking children with High-Functioning Autism (HFA). However, as DOS can be considered a syntax-pragmatics interface phenomenon, it is unclear whether DOS errors are due to impaired syntax or impaired pragmatics. In order to shed light on this question, the current study investigates Object Relative Clauses (ORC), assumed to involve syntactic object placement (as in DOS), but not pragmatics, in children with HFA.

We examine the elicited production, comprehension and judgment of ORCs in 25 Dutch-speaking children with HFA (age 6–14) and 25 TD matches with comparable non-verbal reasoning scores. Results reveal no differences between groups, but show that, similar to TD children (and adults), children with HFA use passives and animacy to disambiguate ORCs. The TD-HFA similarity indicates that the syntactic part of DOS is unimpaired in children with HFA and suggests problems with the pragmatic part.

Keywords: high-functioning autism, object relative clauses, direct object scrambling, syntax-pragmatics interface
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Object Relative Clauses
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Materials and procedures
      • 3.2.1Non-verbal intelligence
      • 3.2.2ORC Production
      • 3.2.3ORC Comprehension
      • 3.2.4ORC Judgment
      • 3.2.5Analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Group results
      • 4.1.1Production
      • 4.1.2Comprehension
      • 4.1.3Judgment
    • 4.2Division into age-groups
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 21 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.33.10sch
References
Adani, Flavia
2011 “Rethinking the acquisition of relative clauses in Italian: towards a grammatically based account”. Journal of Child Language 38:1.141–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association
2000 “Neurodevelopmental Disorders”. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Arosio, Fabrizio, Maria Teresa Guasti & Natale Stucchi
2010 “Disambiguating Information and Memory Recources in Children’s Processing of Italian Relative Clauses”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 401.137–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, Simon
1988 “Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective?” Journal of autism and developmental disorders 18:3.379–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth
1997 “Early acquisition of syntax and discourse in Hebrew”. Psycholinguistic Studies in Israel: Language acquisition, Reading and Writing ed. by Y. Shimron, 57–100. Jerusalem: Magnes Press.Google Scholar
Chevallier, Coralie, Deirdre Wilson, Francesca Happé & Ira Noveck
2010 “Scalar inferences in autism spectrum disorders”. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 40:9.1104–1117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Creemers, Ava & Jeannette Schaeffer
2015 Grammatical and pragmatic properties of the DP in children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI) and in children with High-Functioning Autism (HFA). Linguistics in The Netherlands 2015 ed. by J. Audring and B. Köhnlein, 16–32. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Duinmeijer, Iris
To appear. “Persistent differences in Specific Language Impairment: rule learning or rule implementation?” PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Eigsti, Inge-Marie, Ashley de Marchena, Jillian Schuh & Elizabeth Kelley
2011 “Language acquisition in autism spectrum disorders: a developmental review”. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 51.681–691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Naama & Rama Novogrodsky
2004 “The acquisition of RC comprehension in Hebrew: a study of SLI and normal development”. Journal of Child Language 311.661–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geurts, Hilde
2007 Children’s Communication Checklist. Amsterdam: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Kissine, Mikhail, Julie Cano-Chervel, Sophie Carlier, Philippe De Brabanter, Lesley Ducenne, Marie-Charlotte Pairon, Nicolas Deconinck, Veronique Delvenne & Jacqueline Leybaert
2015 “Children with Autism Understand Indirect Speech Acts: Evidence from a Semi-Structured Act-Out Task”. PLoS ONE 10:11.e0142191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kort Willem, Mark Schittekatte & Elseloes Compaan
2008 CELF-4-NL: Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals-vierde-editie. Amsterdam: Pearson Assessment and Information B.V.Google Scholar
Kuijper, Sanne, Catharina Hartman & Petra Hendriks
2015 “Who is he? Children with ASD and ADHD take the listener into account in their production of ambiguous pronouns”. PLoS ONE 10:7.e0132408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, Dana, Cecile McKee & Judy Bernstein
1998 “How children’s relatives solve a problem for minimalism”. Language 741.308–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Novogrodsky, Rama & Naama Friedmann
2006 “The production of relative clauses in syntactic SLI: A window to the nature of the impairment”. Advances in Speech Language Pathology 8:4.364–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perovic, Alexandra, Nadya Modyanova & Kenneth Wexler
2013 “Comparison of grammar in neurodevelopmental disorders: The case of binding in Williams syndrome and autism with and without language impairment”. Language acquisition 20:2.133–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rademaker, Irene
2014 “De ontwikkeling van de productie van relatieve bijzinnen in het Nederlands”. Bachelor’s thesis, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Raven, John
1976 Raven’s progressive matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Riches, Nick, Tom Loucas, Gillian Baird, Tony Charman & Emily Simonoff
2010 “Sentence repetition in adolescents with specific language impairments and autism: An investigation of complex syntax”. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 45:1.47–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, Jeannette
2012 Specific Language Impairment – Evidence for the division of labor and the interaction between grammar and pragmatics. Saarbruecken: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
2016 “Linguistic and cognitive abilities in children with Specific Language Impairment as compared to children with High-Functioning Autism”. Language Acquisition. DOI: DOI logo.Google Scholar
To appear. “Unravelling the complexity of Direct Object Scrambling”. Language Science. DOI logo
Schaeffer, Jeannette & Lisa Matthewson
2005 “Grammar and pragmatics in the acquisition of article systems”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23:1.53–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, Jeannette & Jorik Geutjes
2014 Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), pragmatics, and direct object scrambling. Presentation at Taalkunde in Nederland Dag 1 February, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Schouwenaars, Atty, Angeliek van Hout & Petra Hendriks
2014 “Word Order Overrules Number Agreement: Dutch Children’s Interpretation and Production of Which-questions”. Selected Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2012) ed. by C. Y. Chu et al., 60–71. Sommerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Zebib, Rasha, Laurice Tuller, Philippe Prévost & Eleonore Morin
2013 “Formal language impairment in French-speaking children with ASD: A comparative ASD / SLI study.” Advances in Language Acquisition ed. by Stavroula Stavrakaki, Marina Lalioti & Polyxeni Konstantinopoulou, 472–482. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.