Article published in:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2017
Edited by Sander Lestrade and Bert Le Bruyn
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 34] 2017
► pp. 77–91

Afrikaans directionality switch in ‘triple’ V-clusters with the auxiliary het

| Utrecht University
The general perspective of the paper is that all (dis)harmonic branching orders within the West-Germanic V-clusters imply a different categorization by the acquisition procedure that should be independently motivated. More specific, the paper discusses the directionality switch with the temporal auxiliary het (‘have’) in Afrikaans. Afrikaans has a right-branching V-cluster 1-2-3. The directionality switches in subordinate clauses when V1 is the auxiliary het, which seemingly gives rise to the a-typical order 2-3-1 [[leer 2 swem 3] het 1]. V2 is in this case an IPP (Infinitivus-pro-participio) infinitive. I propose to derive the directionality switch as a matter of category assignment by an acquisition procedure that is unaware of underlying structure followed by movements. I argue that sentence-final het has been reanalyzed as a morphological suffix on the V3. This leads to a simplification of the apparent 2-3-1 V-cluster into a binary 1–2 V-cluster [leer 1 [swem het]2].
Keywords: (dis)harmonic order, V-clusters, IPP, Afrikaans 2-3-1, acquisition procedure
Article outline
  • 1.A general West-Germanic problem with V-clusters
  • 2.V-cluster directionality in West-Germanic
  • 3.The IPP in West-Germanic
  • 4.The Afrikaans verbal paradigm
  • 5.Triple V-clusters with modal and non-modal verbs in Afrikaans
  • 6.Afrikaans past tense markings with modal verbs
  • 7.The order of acquisition steps in Afrikaans
    • 7.1The acquisition of binary V-clusters
    • 7.2The acquisition of ‘triple’ V-clusters in Afrikaans
  • 8.The morphological status of sentence-final het
  • 9.The suffixation of het in Type II V-clusters
  • 10.Concluding remarks
  • Note
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 23 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.34.06van
References
Abels, Klaus
2013 “On 2-3-1”. UCLWPL 251: 67–101.Google Scholar
Augustinus, Liesbeth & Peter Dirix
2013 “The IPP effect in Afrikaans: a corpus analysis”. Proceedings of the19th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics ed. by Stephan Oepen, Kristin Hagen & Janne Bondi Johannessen, 213–225. Oslo University.Google Scholar
Benvéniste, Emile
1962 Hittite et Indo-Européen: études comparatives. Paris: Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa
2010 “Disharmonic word order, quirky morphology and the Afrikaans verb cluster”. Paper presented at the Workshop on Syntax and Morphology, Arhus.
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg & Ian Roberts
2014 “A syntactic universal and its consequences”. Linguistic Inquiry 451: 169–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conradie, Jac
2007 “The final stages of deflection. The case of Afrikaans het ”. Historical Linguistics 2005 ed. by Joseph Salmons & Shannon Dubenion-Smith, 207–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corver, Norbert, Frenette Southwood & Roeland van Hout 2012 “SLI as a Syntax-Phonology interface problem: Evidence from Afrikaans”. Stellenbosch papers in Linguistics 411: 71–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coupé, Griet
2015 Syntactic extension. The historical development of Dutch verb clusters. PhD diss., Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
De Schutter, Georges
2001 “Een paar beschouwingen over het IPP-effect in het Afrikaans”. Taal & Tongval 531: 197–206.Google Scholar
De Vos, Mark
2001 Afrikaans verb-clusters: a functional head approach. MA thesis, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
2003 “Past participles in Afrikaans dialects and Dutch”. Proceedings of the 22nd WCCFL ed. by Gina Garding & Mimu Tsujimura, 519–532.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Bruce
1993 A Grammar of Afrikaans. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evers, Arnold
2003 “Verbal clusters and cluster creepers”. Verb Constructions in German and Dutch ed. by Peter Seuren & Gerard Kempen, 43–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kampen, Jacqueline van
2016 “Deriving verb-cluster variation in Dutch and German”. Linguistics in the Netherlands 331: 54–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kleij, Suzanne van der
1999 Tijd en aspect in het werkwoordelijke systeem van het Afrikaans. MA thesis, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Le Roux, J.J.
1921 Handleiding in het Afrikaans voor Nederlanders. Amsterdam: Van Looij. http://​www​.dbnl​.org​/tekst​/roux003hand01​_01Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian
2000 The CHILDES project. Tools for analyzing talk. Third Edition. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Meyer, Caitlin & Fred Weerman
2016 “Cracking the cluster: The acquisition of verb raising in Dutch.” Nederlandse Taalkunde 21 (2): 181–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ponelis, Fritz
1993 The Development of Afrikaans. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi
2005 “Verb clusters, verb raising, and restructuring”. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax ed. by Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk, 227–341. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter
2007 “Some notes on the origin and distribution of the IPP-effect.” GAGL 451: 77–99.Google Scholar
Afrikaans directionality switch in ‘triple’ V-clusters with the auxiliary het