Cover not available
Article published In:
Babel
Vol. 63:5 (2017) ► pp.702–728

Ideological shifts between bilingual EU texts

A critical discourse analysis (CDA) approach to translation

| Aristotle University of Thessaloniki |

This article examines the translation of an official English European Council text, namely a Commission Communication, into Greek. A critical discourse analysis-based methodology is used to probe the manipulation of ideological shifts between the English source text and its Greek translation. The analysis of both texts aims to shed light on the way culturally-approved patterns reflect and also influence society’s priorities and preoccupations. The comparative analysis provides an example of how the European Union and its official working language influenced the translator’s attitudes and motivations in decoding various ideological patterns. Adopting a social view of political ideologies and their associated readerships, the article discusses how discourse and ideology mediate in the translation of the English-Greek language pair. It shows how discourse reinforces ideological assumptions and how it challenges them by emphasizing that the source culture violates the very norms and values the target culture holds dear.

Keywords: critical discourse analysis, ideological shifts, mediation, metafunctions, intertextuality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Critical discourse analysis and ideology
    • 2.1A social view of discourse analysis
    • 2.2Discourse and ideology
    • 2.3Ideological mediation in translation
    • 2.4Ideological shifts in translation
  • 3.The analytical framework
  • 4.The data-text in its context of culture and situation
  • 5.Translating ideologically laden elements of an English text into Greek
    • 5.1Ideational meaning and transitivity
    • 5.2Interpersonal meaning and modality
    • 5.3Lexical choice and cohesion
    • 5.4Interdiscursivity
    • 5.5Intertextuality
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 16 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00005.dam
References
Agrapidas, Konstantinos
2006 “Η πρόκληση της μεταρρύθμισης στην Ε.Ε., η ευελιξία και η ασφάλεια στην αγορά της εργασίας.” The World of the Investor, Economy 1781: 2. Google Scholar
Caldas-Coulhard, Carmen R., and B. Holland
2001 “Critical Discourse Analysis”. In Written Discourse, ed. by Malcolm Coulthard, Rosamund Moon, Alison Johnson, Carmen R. Caldas-Coulthard, and Bob Holland, 109–138. Birmingham: The University of Birmingham: The Centre for English Language Studies.Google Scholar
Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen R., Lorraine Quinn-Adriano, and Malcolm Coulthard
2000 “Text types, narration and exposition”. In Translation and Discourse, ed. by Carmen R. Caldas-Coulthard, 88–92. Birmingham: The University of Birmingham: The Centre for English Language Studies.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie, and Norman Fairclough
1999 Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Communication from the Commission
2001 Making a European Area of Lifelong Learning a Reality, COM(2001) 678 final. Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Council Resolution on Lifelong Learning
2002 /C 163/01. Official Journal C 163, 09/07/2002 P. 0001 – 0003. [URL].Google Scholar
Doudoulaki, Chrysoula
2002 “Η μετάφραση κοινοτικών κειμένων ως μετάφραση ειδικών γλωσσών” [The translation of European Commission texts as translation of special languages]. In Translating in the 21st Century: Trends and Prospects, ed. by George Androulakis, 682–689. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1996 “Technologisation of Discourse.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen R. Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard, 71–83. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
2001 Language and Power (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2001a “The discourse of new labour: Critical discourse analysis”. In Discourse as Data, ed. by Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon J. Yates, 229–266. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fochi, Anna
2010 “Reading multimodal translational webs dialogue of the visual and the verbal in Vanity Fair’s publication of Chronicle of a Death Foretold .” Translation Studies 3 (1): 33–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Janet
1999 “The discourse of official texts and how it can impede public service translators.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 20 (3): 194–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorlée, Dinda L.
1994 Semiotics and the Problem of Translation: With Special Reference to the Semiotics of Charles S. Peirce. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart
2001 “Foucault: Power, knowledge and discourse”. In Discourse Theory and Practice, ed. by Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon J. Yates, 72–81. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1978 Language as Social Semiotic. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hardy, Cynthia, Bill Harley, and Nelson Philips
2004 “Discourse analysis and content analysis: Two solitudes?” Qualitative Methods Newsletter Spring: 19–22.Google Scholar
Hatim, Basil, and Ian Mason
1990 Discourse and the Translator. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1997 The Translator as Communicator. London – NewYork: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holland, Bob
2001 “Applications of Text Analysis”. In Written Discourse, ed. by Malcolm Coulthard, Rosamund Moon, Alison Johnson, Carmen R. Caldas-Coulthard, and Bob Holland, 139–161. Birmingham: The University of Birmingham: The Centre for English Language Studies.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, and Nicolas Coupland
2000 “Introduction: Perspectives on discourse analysis”. In The Discourse Reader, ed. by Adam Jaworskis and Nicolas Couplands, 1–37. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther
2001 “From Saussure to critical sociolinguistics: The turn towards a social view of language”. In Discourse Theory and Practice, ed. by Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon J. Yates, 29–38. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kuo, Sai-Hua, and Mari Nakamura
2005 “Translation or transformation? A case study of language and ideology in the Taiwanese press”. Discourse Society 16 (3): 393–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laffey, Mark, and Juda Weldes
2004 “Methodological Reflections on Discourse Analysis”. Qualitative Methods 2 (1): 28–30.Google Scholar
Leckie-Tarry, Hellen
1995 Language and Context: A Functional Linguistic Theory of Register. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Mossop, Brian
2007 “The translator’s intervention through voice selection”. In Translation as Intervention, ed. by Jeremy Munday, 18–37. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Papariga, Αleka
2006 “Συνάντηση ευρωπαϊκών κομμουνιστικών και εργατικών κομμάτων για την Παιδεία” [European Communist and Labour Party Meeting for Education]. Rizospastis, April 8.Google Scholar
Schäffner, Christina
2004 “Political Discourse Analysis from the point of view of Translation Studies”. Journal of Language and Politics 3 (1): 117–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäffner, Christina, and Beverly Adab
1997 “Translation as intercultural communication – Contact as conflict”. In Translation as Intercultural Communication, ed. by M. Snell-Hornby, Z. Jettmarova, and K. Kaindl, 325–337. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A.
1986 Encyclopedic Dictionary of Semiotics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
1996 Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun
1995 “Discourse analysis as ideological analysis”. In Language and Peace, ed. by Christina Schäffner and A. Wenden Teun, 17–33. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.Google Scholar
Varela, Carmen Millán, and Sophia Butt
2000 “Intertextual and intertemporal relations in translation”. In Translation and Discourse, ed. by Carmen Rosa and Caldas-Coulhard, 103–124. Birmingham: The University of Birmingham: The Centre for English Language Studies.Google Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence
1992 “Introduction”. In Rethinking Translation: Discourse, Subjectivity, Ideology, ed. by Lawrence Venuti, 1–17. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wetherell, Margaret
2001 “Debates in discourse research”. In Discourse Theory and Practice, ed. by Margeret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Stephanie J. Yates, 380–399. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Chen, Shukun, Aiping Mo & Shu Yang
2023. ‘We should have a deep understanding’: reinstantiating cognitive processes in the translation of Chinese political discourse. Perspectives ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Shukun, Winfred Wenhui Xuan & Hailing Yu
2022. Applying systemic functional linguistics in translation studies. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 68:4 ► pp. 517 ff. DOI logo
Constantinou, Maria
2020. EU lay communication in translation: mediation, affectivity and EU citizenship. Perspectives 28:2 ► pp. 202 ff. DOI logo
Pomerleau, Marc
2023. Tension in translation: Spain’s and Catalonia’s discourse on independence. Perspectives 31:3 ► pp. 450 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.