Benjamin and Borges
Reflections on afterlife and translation
Rasool Moradi Joz | University of Isfahan
Hossein Pirnajmuddin | University of Isfahan
Borges’ works deconstruct the time lag conceived in the binaries such as the work’s production vs. its criticism, the original text
vs. its translation, the source text vs. the derivative nature of the target text, and reality vs. fiction. Benjamin, as Borges’
near contemporary, echoes rather the same idea in his post-Nietzschean philosophy of translation. Focusing on the similarities
between the views of Benjamin on translation and those of Borges as reflected in his stories as well as his essays, particularly
in his well-received essay on translations of Thousand and One Nights and in his meta-fictional short story
‘Pierre Menard’: Author of the Quixote, this paper aims at bringing the two scholars together in the context
of literary translation studies in the postmodern era, where intersemiotic and intertextual collage (in Eco’s terminology) and
mimicry bear witness to the claim that translation, like other intertextual enterprises, is neither inferior to the other
intertextual undertakings such as writing, nor is it detached from language as post-structurally conceived. Furthermore, another
core objective of this study is to show how Borges’ ‘Menard’ heralds and truly represents the translation
theories built upon the underlying assumptions of deconstructionism since the 1980s. It is concluded that as far as postmodern and
poststructuralist theories are concerned, both Borges’ and Benjamin’s works had predicted the future of literary and translation
theories in which the decisive role of translation and translator in the construction of culture and identities cannot be
denied.
Keywords: Walter Benjamin, Jorge Luis Borges, afterlife, pure language, post-Nietzschean philosophy, deconstructionism
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 3.Translation as original
- 4.Borges as translator
- 5.Ontological echoing of ‘Menard’s’ Quixote in Benjamin’s afterlife
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgments
-
References
Published online: 08 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00029.ras
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00029.ras
References
Aguilar, Jesús
Arrojo, Rosemary
Basalamah, Salah
Baudrillard, Jean
Benjamin, Walter
Berman, Antoine
Borges, Jorge L.
Cronin, Michael
Danto, Arthur C.
de Toro, Fernando
Eco, Umberto
Felinto, Erick
Gentzler, Edwin
Giskin, Howard
Godayol, Pilar
Gracia, Jorge J. E.
Gracia, Jorge J. E.; Carolyn Korsmeyer; and Rodolphe Gasché
Jauss, Hans R.
Jenckes, Kate
Kaindl, Klaus
Kelly, Louis G.
Laiho, Leena
Nabokov, Vladimir
Paz, Octavio
Pym, Anthony
Tymoczko, Maria
Waisman, Sergio