Cover not available
Article published In:
Babel
Vol. 65:2 (2019) ► pp.200–221

A victim of prudishness

Chaucer’s Miller’s Tale retold over the centuries

| National Aviation University, Kiev

Often excluded from Chaucer’s modernizations or heavily censored, The Miller’s Tale over the centuries has been stigmatized as bawdy, obscene and, as such, unfit for the general reader. The article briefly reviews the history of the modernization of The Miller’s Tale in the 18th–19th centuries and focuses on its four major 20th-early 21st-century translations into modern English to find out how the motives of decency might have determined the translators’ choices where it concerns the tale’s explicit language. The argument of decency appears to be a lame excuse for the failure of many of Chaucer’s modernizers to understand the true purport and place of The Miller’s Tale in the overall composition of The Canterbury Tales, as well as to appreciate Chaucer’s literary achievement in representing through his characters’ narratives the spirit and mindset of his age.

Keywords: Chaucer’s The Miller’s Tale , modernization, diachronic intralingual translation, censorship, euphemisation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Sources on the subject
  • 3.Material and methods
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1The bawdy tale
    • 4.2The banned tales
  • 5. The Miller’s Tale in the 18th-century modernizations
  • 6. The Miller’s Tale in the 19th century
  • 7.A comparative analysis of The Miller’s Tale’s explicit material in the four 20th- early 21st-century modernizations
    • 7.1Alison
    • 7.2Nicholas and Alison
    • 7.3Absolon
    • 7.4The kiss
  • 8.Conclusions
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 2 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00088.syd
References
A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles
1901 Volume IV1. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles
1908 Volume VI1 1. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles
1909 Volume VII1. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles
1914 Volume VIII1 1. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles
1928 Volume X2 1. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baldassarro, R. Wolf
2011 “Banned Books Awareness: ‘The Canterbury Tales’”. [URL]
Beidler, Peter G.
2014 The Lives of the Miller’s Tale: The Roots, Composition and Retellings of Chaucer’s Bawdy Story. Jefferson (NC): McFarland.Google Scholar
Bowden, Betsy
(ed.) 1991 18th-Century Modernizations from The Canterbury Tales. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Brewer, Derek
2003 “Knight and Miller: Similarity and Difference”. In Drama, Narrative and Poetry in the Canterbury Tales, ed. by Wendy Harding, 127–138. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail.Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey
1993 The Canterbury Tales. A Complete Translation into Modern English by Ronald L. Ecker; and Eugene J. Crook. Palatka: Hodge & Braddock Publishers.Google Scholar
1951 The Canterbury Tales. Transl. into Modern English by Nevill Coghill. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
The Miller’s Tale, ed. and transl. by NeCastro, Gerard. [URL]
Classen, Albrecht
2008 “The Cultural Significance of Sexuality in the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, and Beyond. A Secret Continuous Undercurrent or a Dominant Phenomenon of the Premodern World? Or: The Irrepressibility of Sex Yesterday and Today”. In Sexuality in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Times, ed. by Albrecht Classen, 1–142. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cobb, Samuel
1712 The Carpenter of Oxford, or, The Miller’s Tale, from Chaucer. Attempted in Modern English. London: printed for E. Curll, at the Dial and Bible, R. Gosling, at the Mitre, and J. Pemberton, at the Buck and Sun in Fleet-Street.Google Scholar
D’Arcens, Louise
2014 Comic Medievalism. Laughing at the Middle Ages. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Farrel, Thomas J.
1989 “Privacy and the Boundaries of Fabliau in The Miller’s Tale”. ELH 56 (4): 773–795. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fumo, Jamie C.
2015 “Ancient Chaucer: Temporalities of Fame”. In Chaucer and Fame: Reputation and Reception, ed. by Isabel Davis; and Catherine Nall, 201–220. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Green, Jonathon; and Karolides, Nicholas J.
2005 Encyclopedia of Censorship. New York: Facts on File, Inc.Google Scholar
Herbruck, Bruce K.
1948 Chaucer Modernization in the Early Nineteenth Century (1801–1841). A Thesis Presented for the Degree of Master of Arts. Columbus (OH): The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Larson, Eric Duane
2016 Telling New Tales: Modernizations of Chaucer in the Eighteenth Century. Theses and Dissertations. Fayetteville (AR): University of Arkansas. [URL]
Lipscomb, William
(ed.) 1795 The Canterbury Tales of Chaucer; Completed in a Modern Version, 3 vols. Oxford: Printed for J. Cooke; and G. G. and J. Robinson.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, Thomas R.
1892 Studies in Chaucer. Volume III1. New York (NJ): Harper & Bros.Google Scholar
Miller, Mark
2005 Philosophical Chaucer: Love, Sex and Agency in the Canterbury Tales. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morton, Mark
2009 The Lover’s Tongue: A Merry Romp through the Language of Love and Sex. Toronto: Insomniac Press.Google Scholar
Rigby, Stephen H.
1996 Chaucer in Context: Society, Allegory and Gender. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Rossignol, Rosalyn
2006 Critical Companion to Chaucer: A Literary Reference to His Life and Work. New York: Facts on File, Inc.Google Scholar
Stone, Geoffrey R.
2007 “Origins of Obscenity”. New York University Review of Law and Social Change 311: 711–731.Google Scholar
The Complete Poetical Works of Geoffrey Chaucer Now First Put into Modern English
by John S. P. Tatlock and Percy MacKaye 1921 New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
The Riverside Chaucer
1990 Third Edition, general ed. Larry D. Benson. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Zumdahl, Sarah C.
1997 “Sexuality and the Balance of Power in the Canterbury Tales”. [URL]