Article published In:
BabelVol. 65:4 (2019) ► pp.478–500
When non-renditions are not the exception
A corpus-based study of court interpreting
This article seeks to explore the nature and function of non-renditions in a corpus of transcriptions of 55 authentic interpreted court proceedings from Barcelona (the TIPp corpus). By doing so, it establishes a dialogue with Cheung’s (2017) contribution about non-renditions in court interpreting in Hong Kong. The transcriptions of the TIPp corpus were annotated using the software EXAMARALDA following Wadenjsö’s (1998) distinction between “talk as text” and “talk as activity”. Non-renditions were considered a part of “talk as activity”. A distinction was made between justified non-renditions, i.e. those that were used to ask for a pause to interpret, to ask for clarification, to confirm possibly misheard information and to retrieve parts of the original message in case of a lapsus, and unjustified non-renditions, e.g. when interpreters give advice to the defendants or warn them, when they answer on behalf of defendants, or when they supply information not provided in the original utterances. The findings reveal alarming averages of non-renditions in the bilingual parts of the trial (58.3 per bilingual hour), with a higher ratio of unjustified non-renditions. These findings have a clear correlation with the poor working conditions of court interpreters in Spain and reveal an urgent need for professionalisation of this practice in this country.
Keywords: court interpreting, non-renditions, impartiality, TIPp corpus
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Non-renditions, visibility and impartiality
- 3.Interpreters in Spanish courts
- 4.Method and corpus
- 5.Findings
- 5.1Relative frequency of non-renditions
- 5.2Justified vs. unjustified non-renditions
- 5.2.1Justified non-renditions
- 5.2.2Unjustified non-renditions
- 5.4Self-initiated vs. other prompted
- 6.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (27)
Angelelli, Claudia
2014 Revisiting the Interpreter’s Role: A Study of Conference, Court, and Medical Interpreters in Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Angermeyer, Philipp Sebastian
2015 Speak English Or What?: Codeswitching and Interpreter Use in New York City. New York: OUP. 
APTIJ
2010 Código deontológico para intérpretes y traductores judiciales y jurados. Code of ethics for court and sworn interpreters and translators. [URL]
Arumí, Marta; Bestué, Carmen; Gil-Bardají, Anna; Orozco-Jutorán, Mariana; Vargas-Urpi, Mireia; and Vigier, Francisco
2017 La qualitat de la traducció com a factor de garantia del procés penal: desenvolupament de recursos per a intèrprets judicials (el projecte TIPp). Report. [URL]
Arumí, Marta; and Vargas-Urpi, Mireia
2017 “Strategies in public service interpreting. A roleplay study of Chinese – Spanish/Catalan interactions”. Interpreting 19 (1): 118–141.
2018 “Annotation of interpreters’ conversation management problems and strategies in a corpus of criminal trials in Spain: the case of non-renditions”. Translation and Interpreting 13 (3): 4211–441.
Berk-Seligson, Susan
1990 The bilingual courtroom: Court interpreters in the judicial process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cambridge, Jan
2002 “Interlocutor roles and the pressures on interpreters”. In Traducción e Interpretación en los Servicios Públicos. Nuevas necesidades para nuevas realidades, ed. by C. Valero Garcés; and G. Mancho Barés, 119–124. Madrid: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alcalá.
Cheung, Andrew K. F.
Del Pozo Triviño, Maribel; and Blasco Mayor, M. Jesús
2015 “Legal Interpreting in Spain at a turning point”. MonTI, 71: 41–71.
García-Beyaert, Sofía; Bancroft, Marjory A.; Allen, Katharine; Carriero-Contreras, Giovanna; and Socarrás-Estrada, Denis
2015 “Ethics and Standards for The Community Interpreter. An International Training Tool”. In The Community Interpreter, ed. by M. Bancroft et al., 4–30. Columbia: Culture & Language Press.
Hale, Sandra
2004 The discourse of court interpreting: Discourse practices of the law, the witness, and the interpreter. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2008 “Controversies over the role of the court interpreter”. In Crossing Borders in Community Interpreting: Definitions and dilemmas, ed. by C. Valero Garcés; and A. Martin, 99–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mikkelson, Holly
2008 “Evolving views of the court interpreter’s role”. In Crossing borders in community interpreting, ed. by C. Valero-Garcés; and A. Martin, 81–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
NAJIT
Niska, Helge
1995 “Just interpreting: Role conflicts and discourse types in court interpreting”. In Translation and the law, ed. by M. Morris, 293–316. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Onos, Liudmila
2014 La interpretación en el ámbito judicial: el caso del rumano en los tribunales de Barcelona. PhD dissertation. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. [URL]
Orozco-Jutorán, Mariana
2017 “Anotación textual de un corpus multilingüe de interpretación judicial a partir de grabaciones de procesos penales reales”. Revista de Llengua i Dret, 681: 33–56.
2018 “The TIPp Project: Developing Technological Resources Based on the Exploitation of Oral Corpora to Improve Court Interpreting”. Intralinea. [URL]
2019 “A Mixed-Methods Approach to Research in Corpus-Based Interpreting Studies. Translation and Interpreting in Criminal Procedures in Spain”. In Qualitative and quantitative research methods in legal translation/interpreting studies, ed. by L. Biel; V. Sosoni; J. Engberg; and R. Martín Ruano.
Ortega Herráez, Juan Miguel
2006 Análisis de la práctica de la interpretación judicial en España: el intérprete frente a su papel profesional. PhD dissertation. Universidad de Granada. [URL]
Ozolins, Uldis
Vargas-Urpi, Mireia
2017 “Court interpreting as a shared responsibility: judges and lawyers in a corpus of interpreted criminal proceedings”. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 751: 139–154.
Forthcoming “Juicios multilingües en Barcelona desde la perspectiva de la sociología del lenguaje: lenguas dominantes, lenguas minorizadas y lenguas invisibles”. Onomazéin 471.
Wadensjö, Cecilia
1992 Interpreting as Interaction: On Dialogue Interpreting in Immigration Hearings and Medical Encounters. Linköping: Linköping University, Department of Communication Studies.
1998 Interpreting as Interaction. London: Longman.
2015 “Non-renditions”. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, ed. by Franz Pöchhacker, 352–353. London: Routledge.
Cited by (5)
Cited by 5 other publications
Chi, Huidong
2024. El intérprete como coordinador del intercambio comunicativo: análisis de su voz propia en el proceso judicial. Revista de Llengua i Dret :81 ► pp. 134 ff. 
Bestué, Carme & Mireia Vargas-Urpí
2023. You speak some Spanish? Indicators of interpreters’ (non-) performance in Spanish criminal courts. Revista de Llengua i Dret :79 ► pp. 116 ff.
Li, Ruitian, Kanglong Liu & Andrew K. F. Cheung
2023. Interpreter visibility in press conferences: a multimodal conversation analysis of speaker–interpreter interactions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10:1
Pym, Anthony, Judith Raigal-Aran & Carmen Bestué Salinas
2023. Non-standard court interpreting as risk management. In Introducing New Hypertexts on Interpreting (Studies) [Benjamins Translation Library, 160], ► pp. 108 ff.
ÖZSÖZ, Burak
2023. A Discourse-Oriented Approach to Interpreter’s Non-Rendition Behaviour: A Case Study of An Interpreted Parent-Teacher Talk. Journal of Language Research 7:1 ► pp. 80 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.