Cover not available
Article published In:
Babel
Vol. 65:4 (2019) ► pp.538–561

A descriptive comparative study of the strategies applied for the translation of the vernacular dialect of John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men as a sociolect into Farsi

| Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University
| Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University

This study aims to identify and compare the strategies applied by native Farsi Translators, Parviz Dariyush (1975) and Soroush Habibi (2009), in rendering the vernacular dialect (Chicano English) of John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men (1965) as a sociolect into Farsi. One hundred samples which contained seven unique characteristics of vernacular dialect limited to the two main characters of the novel, George and Lennie, were extracted from the novel with their Farsi equivalents. Sienkiewicz (1984, as cited in Berezowski 1997: 35) proposed strategies for the translation of dialects are taken as the model for this study to investigate the way dialectal features are dealt with in the selected parts and to check whether the procedure proposed by Sienkiewicz is sufficient and adequate for their translation. Analysing these samples, the results showed that one-to-one transference of dialectal elements is not practically possible into Farsi. However, both translators used phonological, syntactical, and morphological irregularities of Colloquial Farsi to show that the language of the novel is not standard language. Approximate Variety Substitution is the most frequent strategy used by Habibi and Dariyush. The aim of this strategy is to select a colloquial variety that has some dialectal features such as lexical, phonological, and morphological specifics and at the same time does not present an obvious recognizable TL dialect.

Keywords: Chicano English, dialect, equivalence, literary translation, sociolect, Southwestern dialect, Standard English, vernacular
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Review of the related literature
    • 2.1Functions of language and dialect
    • 2.2Translatability or untranslatability of dialects and the strategies applied
    • 2.3Linguistic features of colloquial Farsi
      • 2.3.1Phonological differences
      • 2.3.2Morphological differences
        • 2.3.2.1Nouns and pronouns
        • 2.3.2.2The verb “to be”
        • 2.3.2.3Syntactical differences
  • 3.Methodology and data collection
  • 4.Data analysis
    • 4.1Negative concord
    • 4.2Subject-verb disagreement
    • 4.3Use of ain’t
    • 4.4Irregular verbs
    • 4.5Pronominal traits
    • 4.6Reductions of words
    • 4.7Colloquial use of words
  • 5.Results and discussions
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 2 September 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00105.ala
References (40)
Adger, C. T.; Wolfram, W.; and Christian, D.
2007 Dialects in schools and communities, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adamowicz-Pospiech, A.
2012 “Pidgin English and sailor’s jargon in Polish translations of Joseph Conrad’s Typhoon”. [URL]
Bashiri, I.
1991 Persian for beginners: Reading Texts, 4th ed. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Company. [URL]
Berezowski, L.
1997 Dialect in Translation. Wroclaw: Wyda Winctwo Uniwesytetu Wroclawski ego. [URL]
Berthele, R.
2000 “Translating African American Vernacular English into German: The problem of Jim in Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn”. Journal of sociolinguistics 4 (4): 588–613. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daryabandari, F.
1990 Sargozashte Hackleberry Finn. Tehran: Kharazmi Publishing.Google Scholar
Daryush, P.
1975 Mooshha va Adamha. Tehran: Bongah Maarefat Publishing.Google Scholar
Golestan, E.
1970 Hackleberry Finn. Tehran: Agah Publishing.Google Scholar
Green, L.
2002 African American English: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habibi, S.
2009 Mooshha va Adamha, 3rd ed. Tehran: Nashre Mahi Publishing.Google Scholar
Haugen, E.
1966 “Dialect, language, Nation”. American Anthropologist 68 (4): 922–935. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jazani, M.
2009 Kolbeye Amu Tom. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publishing.Google Scholar
Kardos, E.
2011 “Chicano English and southwestern Spanish”. In Perspectives on American English, ed. by M. Dipaolo; and A. K. Spears, Chap. 8–10. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kortmann, B.; and Upton, C.
(eds) 2008 Varieties of English: The British Isles. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Landers, C. E.
2001 Literary translation: A practical guide. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liang, S.
2015 Language attitudes and identities in multilingual China: A linguistic Ethnography. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mašlaň, M.
2006 Dialect and translation. Master’s thesis. Brno: Masaryk University. [URL]
Momma, H.; and Matto, M.
(eds) 2008 A companion to the history of English language. Malden (MA): Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nenadál, R.
1987 Hrozny hnhněvu. Praha: Melantrich.Google Scholar
Noppers, A.
2010 The translation of Youth language: A comparison of Dutch translations of Catcher in the Rye and less than Zero. Master’s thesis. Utrecht: University of Utrecht. [URL]
Otten-Annisette, W.
2011 Toward a strategy of dialect reconstruction for the translation of nonstandard language in the stories of Anna Lydia Vega. Master’s thesis. Sheffield: University of Sheffield. [URL]
Ӧzben, R. T.
1998 A critical re-evaluation of Gideon Toury’s target-oriented approach to translation phenomena. Master’s thesis, Istanbul: Boğaziҫi University. [URL]
Pakkinen, T.
2013 A study of AAVE in three novels and colloquial Finnish in their translations: The Dark Tower П: The Drawing of the Three, A Time to Kill and Push. Master’s thesis, Turku: University of Turku. [URL]
Pinto, S. R.
2009 “How important is the way you say it: A discussion on the translation of linguistic varieties in different media”. International Journal in Translation Studies 21 (2): 289–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Procházka, V.
1963 Hrozny hnhněvu. Praha: Státní Nakladatelství dětské knihy.Google Scholar
Rosa, A.
2012 “Linguistic variation in translation”. A journal of literary studies and linguistics 2 (2): 75–97.Google Scholar
Samadi, H.
1984 Kolbeye Amu Tam. Tehran: Eynollahi Publishing.Google Scholar
Sanchez, M. T.
2009 The problem of literary translation: A study of theory and practice of translation from English into Spanish. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Seppälä, J.
2008 “Vernacular English in John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men: Introduction to American English”. [URL]
Sharififar, M.; and Bahrami, N.
2011 “Translation of dialect: A case study of translation of Black English into Farsi”. Ferdowsi Review 1 (4): 85–104.Google Scholar
Sharififar, M.; and Enjavi Nejad, A.
2013 “A study of African American dialect translation into Persian in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Authors”. The Iranian EFL Journal 1 (9): 484–504.Google Scholar
Sladková, P.
2013 Nonstandard English varieties in literary translation: The Help by Kathryn Stockett. Master’s thesis, Brno: Masaryk University. [URL]
Steinbeck, J.
1965 Of Mice and Men. New York: Viking Penguin Publishing.Google Scholar
1992 The Grapes of Wrath. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Stowe, H. B.
1995 Uncle Tom’s Cabin. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Tanner, D. C.
2007 Medical-legal and forensic aspects of communication disorders, voice prints, and speaker profiling. Tucson (AZ): Lawyers and Judges Publishing.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P.
1999 “Standard English: What it isn’t”. In Standard English: The widening debate, ed. by T. Bex; and R. J. Watts, 117–128. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Twain, M.
1885 The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W.; and Schilling-Estes, N.
2016  American English: Dialect and Variation, 3rd ed. Malden (MA): Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yule, G.
2006 The study of language, 3rd ed. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by 1 other publications

Jiménez Camacho, Fiorella Patricia & Carol Lizbeth Torres Sanchez
2023. “¿Y hoy quíago? / Oh Lor, what’ll I do now?”: traducción al inglés de los rasgos orales de Cuentos del tío Lino. TRANS: Revista de Traductología :27 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.