Translating ancient Chinese legal works
A contextualized narrative approach
Dai Yongjun | Nanjing University/Anhui University of Technology
Xiangqing Wei | Nanjing University
The notion of narrative is a very productive concept in many disciplines, and it has been introduced and applied effectively in translation studies, where the specific narrative typology and narrative features are drawn and outlined. Based on the understanding of translation and the analysis of narrative features by Baker, this paper examines the issues in translating ancient Chinese legal works. The default narrative features in ancient Chinese legal works are firstly given a detailed explanation, then the challenges to the Western sinologists in re-narrating ancient Chinese legal stories, especially for the purposes of constructing a “moral” world for the Western readers. For the purpose of successful communication, the fundamental elements in Chinese legal tradition should be given more attention. Thus a contextualized narrative strategy is proposed for application in translating ancient Chinese legal works. For successful communication, it requires on the part of the narrator a degree of creative adaptation.
Keywords: défis, narration contextualisée, ancient Chinese legal works, default narrative features, translation, challenges, contextualized narrative, anciens ouvrages juridiques chinois, caractéristiques narratives par défaut, traduction
Published online: 27 September 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00111.dai
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00111.dai
References
References
Alford, William P.
1997 “Why western scholars of Chinese history and society have not had more to say about its law”. Modern China 23 (4): 398–419. 
Baker, Mona
2005 “Narratives in and of Translation”. SKASE Journal of Translation and Interpretation (1): 4–13.
2006 Translation and Conflict: A Narrative Account. London: Routledge.
2014 “Translation as Re-narration”. In Translation: A multidisciplinary approach, ed. by House, Juliane, 158–177. Houndmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bruner, Jerome
1991 “The Narrative Construction of Reality”. Critical Inquiry 18 (1): 1–21.
Callahan, Sidney
2008 “Comment on Confucian family love from a Christian perspective”. Dao 7 (2): 145–149.
Duyvendak, Jan Julius Lodewijk
(tr.) 1928 The Book of Lord Shang. London: Arthur Probsthain.
Gao, Heng
1974 商君书注译 [shāng jun1 shū zhù yì, Notes and Translation of Shang Jun Shu]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
Graham, Angus
1989 Disputers of the Tao. La Salle (IL): Open Court.
Huang, Dong-hai; and Fan Zhong-xin
2008 “春秋铸刑书刑鼎究竟昭示了什么巨变” [chūn qiū zhù xíng shū xíng dǐng jiū jìng zhāo shì le shí me – What great changes does the casting of penal books and penal tripods during the Spring and Autumn period bring about?]. Science of Law (2): 53–61.
Jiang Yong-lin
(tr.) 2005 The Great Ming Code. Seattle (WA): University of Washington Press.
Johnson, Wallace
(tr.) 1975 The T’ang Code. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
Kitson, Peter
2013 “Thomas Percy and the forging of Romantic China”. In Forging Romantic China: Sino-British Cultural Exchange 1760–1840, ed. by Kitson, Peter J., 26–44. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.
Knoblock, John; and Jeffrey, Riegel
(tr.) 2000 The Annals of Lü Buwei. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.
Legge, James
(tr.) 1861 Chinese Classics, I, Confucian Analects, The Great Learing, and the Doctrine of the Mean. London: Trübner & Co.
Liao Ming-chun
2013 “《论语》’父子互隐’章新证” (lùn yǔ fù zǐ hù yǐn zhāng xīn zhèng – New Interpretation of “Mutual concealment between father and sons” in Analects 13.18). Journal of Hunan University 2: 5–13.
Liao, Wen Kwei
(tr.) 1939 The Complete Works of Han Fei Tzu. London: Arthur Probsthain.
Liu, Charles Chao
2001 “China’s Lawyer System: Dawning upon the World through a Tortuous Process”. Whittier Law Review 23: 1037–1054.
Loewe, Michael
1993 Early Chinese Texts: A bibliographical guide. Berkeley (CA): University of California (Institute of East Asian Studies).
Pines, Yuri
(tr.) 2017 The book of Lord Shang: apologetics of state power in early China. New York (NY): Columbia University Press.
Schwartz, Benjamin
1985 The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Somers, Margaret R.
1992 “Narrativity, Narrative Identity, and Social Action: Rethinking English Working- Class Formation”. Social Science History 16 (4): 591–630.
1997 “Deconstructing and Reconstructing Class Formation Theory: Narrativity, Relational Analysis, and Social Theory”. In Reworking Class, ed. by John R. Hall, 73–105. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Somers, Margaret R.; and Gloria D. Gibson
1994 “Reclaiming the Epistemological ‘Other’: Narrative and the Social Constitution of Identity”. In Social Theory and the Politics of Identity, ed. By Craig Calhoun, 37–99. Oxford: Blackwell.
Staunton, George Leonard
(tr.) 1810 Ta-Tsing-Lue-Lee. London: T. Cadell and W. Davies.
T’ung-Tsu Ch’ü
2011 Law and Society in Traditional China. Beijing: Commercial Press.
Turner, Karen
1993 “War, Punishment, and The Law of Nature in Early Chinese Concepts of The State”. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 53 (2): 285–324.
Wang Erh-min
1975 A Bibliography of Western translation of Chinese Works. Taipei: The Commercial Press.
Xiong De-mi
2018 “A critical Study on translation of ancient legal classics” (gǔ dài fǎ lǜ diǎn jí wài yì jíqí pīpíng yán jiū 古代法律典籍外译及其批评研究). http://www.cssn.cn/djch/djch_djchhg/gxwy/201810/t20181019_4719482.shtml
Yuan Hui
2009 “讲述中国古代法自己的‘故事’” [jiǎng shù zhōng guó gǔ dài fǎ zì jǐ de “gù shì” – Retell the ancient Chinese legal stories on its own]. Legal Information (6): 32–36.
Zhang Jin-fan
2013 “Ancient China’s Legal Tradition and Legal Thought”. Social Sciences in China 34 (2): 134–151.
Zhang Jue
1992 韩非子全译 [hán fēi zǐ quán yì – The Complete Modern Chinese Translation of Han Fei Tzu]. Guiyang: Guizhou People’s Publishing House.
Zhang Xi-ping
2014 “中国文化外译的主体当是国外汉学家” [zhōng guó wén huà wài yì de zhǔ tǐ dāng shì guó wài hàn xué jiā, – The main force of translating Chinese culture is foreign sinologists]. Sino-foreign Cultural Exchanges 2: 86–88.