Cover not available
Article published In:
Translation and Challenges of the Third Millennium
Edited by Frans De Laet, Brankica Bojović and Boris Hlebec
[Babel 65:6] 2019
► pp. 817–829

The gerund challenge

English gerund forms and their Romanian equivalents in the translation of EU documents

| Alexandru Ioan Cuza University

A cursory overview of how the ‑ing forms of a small sample of verbs (see, take, do) are translated in various types of European documents as presented on Linguee (http://​www​.linguee​.com/) indicates a surprising variety of possible equivalents in Romanian: infinitive and nominalized infinitive, conjunctive (preceded by marker să), verbs in the various tenses of the indicative, nominal groups, gerunziu ‑ind/ ‑ând forms etc.

Translators often have to compensate for the fact that both English participles and gerunds are potentially ambiguous without complements. Translating any ‑ing forms often involves obligatory or optional grammatical transformations. The present paper proposes the creation of a (preliminary) inventory of interlinguistic correspondences of gerund forms and their equivalents in Romanian based on real corpus (reports of the parliamentary committees) to point out the various translational options, evaluate them quantitatively (the most/least frequently used solutions) and to reveal potential difficulties arising from such an array of options.

Keywords: gerund, translation, corpus, EU documents
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Corpus
  • 3.Results and discussion
  • 4.Conclusions for translators
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00125.ghi
References
Academia Română
2008 Gramatica Limbii Române. Bucureşti: Editura Academiei.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A.; G. Iordăchioia; F. Schäffer
2011 ”Scaling the variation in Romance and Germanic nominalizations”. In The Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic. Structure, variation, and change, ed. By Petra Sleeman; and Harry Perridon, 25–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aranberri-Monasterio, N.; S. O‘Brien
2009 “Evaluating RBMT output for ‑ing forms: A study of four target languages”. Linguistica Antverpiensia 81: 105–122.Google Scholar
Bednárová-Gibová, K.
s.a. 2018 Nominalization, translation studies and critical stylistics: A case study of EU-ese in parallel English-Slovak texts. [URL]
Biber, D.
1988 Variation across speech and writing Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernth, A.; and Gdaniec, C.
2001 “Translatability”. Machine Translation 161: 175–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowker, L.; and Pearson, J.
2002 Working with specialized language. A practical guide to using corpora. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimitriu, C.
2000 Tratat de gramatica a limbii romane. I Morfologia. Iași: Institutul EuropeanGoogle Scholar
Duffley, P.
2006 The English Gerund-participle: A Comparison with the Infinitive. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gómez-Castejón, Á.
2012 “Contrastive analysis and translation study from a corpus linguistics Perspective”. International Journal of English Studies IJES 12 (2): 111–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R.; and Pullum, G.
2002 The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izquierdo, M.
2008 ”The translaton of ‑ing nominal constructons into Spanish: a corpus-based study”. In Actas del III Congreso Internacional de la Asociación Ibérica de Estudios de Traducción e Interpretación. La traducción del futuro: mediación lingüístca y cultural en el siglo XXI, ed. by Pegenaute, L.; Decesaris, J.; Tricás, M.; and Bernal, E., 101–112. Barcelona: PPU.Google Scholar
Malá, M.; P. Šaldová
2015 ”English non-finite participial clauses as seen through their Czech counterparts”. Nordic Journal of English Studies 14 (1): 232–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malouf, Robert
1998 Mixed categories in the hierarchical lexicon. [dissertation] [URL]
Mehl, S.
1996 “Systematic Alternatives in Lexicalization: The Case of Gerund Translation”. Machine Translation 11 (1-2-3): 185–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehl, S.; Volk, M.
1999 “Aspects of the translation of English subordinate clauses into German. Problems and Potential of English-to-German MT systems”. Workshop at the 8th International Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation, Chester 1999.
Quirk, R. et al.
1976 A University Grammar of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Van Landeghem, Jordy
2015 ‑ing seen through its Dutch Translation Equivalents: A contrastive parallel treebank based study [MA thesis] DOI logoGoogle Scholar