Interpreters face distinct challenges when deployed remotely via video link, due to their virtual presence but
physical absence in the conversation. Depending on the interpreting service, interpreters can also be exposed to greater
spontaneity and hence increased pressure if video-mediated interpreting is offered as an instant service. The examples discussed
in this paper draw on an interpreting studies-based analysis of the Austrian pilot project “Video-mediated interpreting in
healthcare.” In this study data were generated by means of an observational protocol, five recordings of authentic video-mediated
interpreted communicative events, five retrospective interviews with the interpreters from the recorded video-mediated interpreted
communicative events, and eight expert interviews with all interpreters from the pilot project. The scope of this article is to
present some of the main findings and draw attention to a crucial strategy used in remote interpreting, namely a reliance on
relevant sensory awareness.
2015 “Body Languag”. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, ed. by Franz Pöchhacker; Nadja Grbić; Peter Mead; and Robin Setton, 36–38. London: Routledge.
2015Das Nonverbale beim Dolmetschen im psychotherapeutischen Setting. München: Akademische Verlagsgemeinschaft München.
Braun, Sabine
2004Kommunikation unter widrigen Umständen? Fallstudien zu einsprachigen und gedolmetschten Videokonferenzen. Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 475. Tübingen: Narr.
2014 “Comparing traditional and remote interpreting in police settings: quality and impact factors”. In Traduzione e interpretazione per la società e le istituzioni, ed. by Viezzi, M.; and Falbo, C., 161–176. Trieste: Edizioni Università di Trieste (EUT).
Braun, Sabine; and Judith Taylor
2012 “Video-Mediated Interpreting: an Overview of Current Practice and Research”. In Videoconference and Remote Interpreting in Criminal Proceedings, ed. by Sabine Braun; and Judith L. Taylor, 27–57. Cambridge: Intersentia.
Frank, Mark G.; Darrin J. Griffin; Elena Svetieva; and Andreas Maroulis
2015 “Nonverbal Elements of the Voice”. In Kostić 2015: 92–113.
Hale, Sandra; and Jemina Napier
2013Research Methods in Interpreting: A Practical Resource. Research Methods in Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.
Havelka, Ivana
2018Videodolmetschen im Gesundheitswesen: Dolmetschwissenschaftliche Untersuchung eines österreichischen Pilotprojektes. TRANSÜD. Arbeiten zur Theorie und Praxis des Übersetzens und Dolmetschens 96. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
2011Dialog als Prinzip: Für eine emanzipatorische Praxis und Didaktik des Dolmetschens. Translations-Wissenschaft 6. Tübingen: Narr.
Kadrić, Mira
2014 “Mission Impossible? : Training for the Institutions and Educating for Society”. In Traduzione e interpretazione per la società e le istituzioni, ed. by Viezzi, M.; and Falbo, C., 131–141. Trieste: Edizioni Università di Trieste (EUT).
Kalina, Sylvia
1998Strategische Prozesse beim Dolmetschen: Theoretische Grundlagen, empirische Fallstudien, didaktische Konsequenzen. Language in performance 18. Tübingen: Narr.
Kurz, Ingrid
1996Simultandolmetschen als Gegenstand der interdisziplinären Forschung. Wien: WUV-Universitätsverlag.
Kutz, Wladimir
2010Dolmetschkompetenz: Was muss der Dolmetscher wissen und können?Translatio 1. München: European University Press.
Kutz, Wladimir
2012Dolmetschkompetenz: Was muss der Dolmetscher wissen und können? München: European University Press.
Moser-Mercer, Barbara
2005 “Remote interpreting: The crucial role of presence”. Bulletin VALS-ASLA 81: 73–97.
Nešić, Milkica; and Vladimir Nešić
2015 “Neuroscience of Nonverbal Communication”. In The social psychology of nonverbal communication, ed. by Aleksandra Kostić, 31–65. Houndmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Posner, Roland
2003 „Ebenen der Bildkompetenz“. In Was ist Bildkompetenz? Studien zur Bildwissenschaft, hg. von Sachs-Hombach, Klaus, 17–24. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
Price, Erika L.; Eliseo J. Pérez-Stable; Dana Nickleach; Monica López; and Leah S. Karliner
2012 “Interpreter Perspectives of in-Person, Telephonic, and Videoconferencing Medical Interpretation in Clinical Encounters”. Patient education and counseling 87 (2): 226–232.
Roat, Cyntia; and Ineke Crezee
2015 “Healthcare Interpreting”. In The Routledge Handbook of Interpreting, ed. by Holly Mikkelson; and Renée Jourdenais, 236–253. London: Routledge.
Röhner, Jessica; and Astrid Schütz
2016Psychologie der Kommunikation. 2., Auflage. Basiswissen Psychologie. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Roy, Cynthia B.
2000Interpreting as a Discourse Process. Oxford studies in sociolinguistics. New York (NY): OUP.
1975 “Alienation Studies”. Annual Review of Sociology 1 (1): 91–123.
Short, John; Ederyn Williams; and Bruce Christie
1976The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: Wiley.
Tebble, Helen
2012 “Interpreting or Interfering?” In Coordinating Participation in Dialogue Interpreting, ed. by Claudio Baraldi; and Laura Gavioli, 23–44. Benjamins Translation Library Vol. 1021. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tipton, Rebecca; and Olgierda Furmanek
2016Dialogue Interpreting: A Guide to Interpreting in Public Services and the Community. Routledge Interpreting Guides. London: Routledge.
Wadensjö, Cecilia
1998Interpreting as Interaction. Language in social life series. London: Longman.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Feng, Cheng, S. Zhu, Y. Chen & J. Liang
2023. Studies on Global Remote Interpreting: A PRISMA Systematic Review. SHS Web of Conferences 162 ► pp. 01031 ff.
2024. Recent Developments in Cultural Psychiatry. In Mental Health Research and Practice, ► pp. 49 ff.
Lázaro Gutiérrez, Raquel & Cristina Álvaro Aranda
2023. Introduction to New Trends in Healthcare Interpreting Studies. In New Trends in Healthcare Interpreting Studies [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 1 ff.
Tuteja, Amita, Elisha Riggs, Lena Sanci, Lester Mascarenhas, Di VanVliet, Katrina Sangster, Kimberley McGuinness & Meredith Temple-Smith
2021. Interpreting in Sexual and Reproductive Health Consults With Burma Born Refugees Post Settlement: Insights From an Australian Qualitative Study. Frontiers in Communication 6
Zhu, Xuelian & Vahid Aryadoust
2022. A Synthetic Review of Cognitive Load in Distance Interpreting: Toward an Explanatory Model. Frontiers in Psychology 13
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.