Review published In:
Babel
Vol. 67:2 (2021) ► pp.249253
References (10)
References
Bordia, Prashant. 1997. “Face-to-Face versus Computer-Mediated Communication: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature.” Journal of Business Communication 34 (1): 99–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, Sabine, and Judith L. Taylor, eds. 2012. Videoconference and Remote Interpreting in Criminal Proceedings. Cambridge and Antwerp: Intersentia.Google Scholar
, eds. 2015. Advances in Videoconferencing and Interpreting in Legal Proceedings. Cambridge and Antwerp: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Dastyar, Vorya. 2019. Dictionary of Education and Assessment in Translation and Interpreting Studies (TIS). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Suzanne, and Jemina Napier, eds. 2015. Interpreter Education in the Digital Age: Innovation, Access, and Change. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Fantinuoli, Claudio, ed. 2018. Interpreting and Technology. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Luppicini, Rocci. 2007. “Review of Computer-Mediated Communication Research for Education .” Instructional Science 351: 141–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napier, Jemina, Skinner, Robert, and Sabine Braun, eds. 2018. Here or There: Research on Interpreting via Video Link. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Salaets, Heidi, and Geert Brône, eds. 2020. Linking up with Video: Perspectives on Interpreting Practice and Research. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xia, Yun. 2012. “Students’ Evaluation of Online Discussion: An Ethnographic Construction of Learning Contexts.” In Computer-Mediated Communication: Issues and Approaches in Education, edited by Sigrid Kelsey and Kirk St. Amant, 173–189. Hershey PA: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar