Review published in:
Vol. 67:2 (2021) ► pp. 249253


Bordia, Prashant
1997 “Face-to-Face versus Computer-Mediated Communication: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature.” Journal of Business Communication 34 (1): 99–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braun, Sabine, and Judith L. Taylor
eds. 2012Videoconference and Remote Interpreting in Criminal Proceedings. Cambridge and Antwerp: Intersentia.Google Scholar
eds. 2015Advances in Videoconferencing and Interpreting in Legal Proceedings. Cambridge and Antwerp: Intersentia.[ p. 253 ]Google Scholar
Dastyar, Vorya
2019Dictionary of Education and Assessment in Translation and Interpreting Studies (TIS). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Suzanne, and Jemina Napier
eds. 2015Interpreter Education in the Digital Age: Innovation, Access, and Change. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Fantinuoli, Claudio
ed. 2018Interpreting and Technology. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Luppicini, Rocci
2007 “Review of Computer-Mediated Communication Research for Education .” Instructional Science 35: 141–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Napier, Jemina, Skinner, Robert, and Sabine Braun
eds. 2018Here or There: Research on Interpreting via Video Link. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Salaets, Heidi, and Geert Brône
eds. 2020Linking up with Video: Perspectives on Interpreting Practice and Research. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xia, Yun
2012 “Students’ Evaluation of Online Discussion: An Ethnographic Construction of Learning Contexts.” In Computer-Mediated Communication: Issues and Approaches in Education, edited by Sigrid Kelsey and Kirk St. Amant, 173–189. Hershey PA: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar