Article published In:
BabelVol. 67:6 (2021) ► pp.758–790
The constraints in the field of institutional translation in Turkey
A perspective from sociology of translation
This paper aims to examine the constraints in the institutional field within the framework of the sociology of translation. In the paper, the term “constraint” refers to the problems that cannot be solved due to many factors and negatively affect the translation process, translators, and therefore translation product. The paper will reveal all the constraints with an analysis of the position of the field within the field of power, the structure of the field, and the habitus of agents (here exclusively referring to translators), based on Pierre Bourdieu’s model of field analysis. The study draws on the case studies of four institutions to analyze all the dynamics of the institutional field and their impact on the translation process and translation product. The institutions are the European Union Translation Coordination Presidency (EUTCP) and the Prime Ministry Directorate General of Press and Information (PDGPI) as a national institution, the United Nations World Food Program (WFP) as an international institution, and the Association of Solidarity with Asylum Seekers and Immigrants (ASAM) as a non-governmental organization. Face-to-face interviews with these four institutions, which carry out different translation activities for different purposes, will reveal the big picture of the field. However, more empirical work is needed to generalize about the constraints of this field.
Keywords: constraints, institutional translation, institutional field, translation sociology, Pierre Bourdieu
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Methodological considerations
- 3.The constraints in the institutional field
- 3.1Sociological analysis of the constraints
- 4.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Bourdieu, Pierre
1991 Language and Symbolic Power, edited by John B. Thompson, translated by Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge: Polity.
1993a Sociology in Question, translated by Richard Nice. London, England: Sage Publications.
1993b The Field of Cultural Production, edited by Randal Johnson. New York: Columbia University Press.
1995 The Rules of Art, translated by Susan Emanuel. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre, and J. D. Wacquant
2014 Düşünümsel Bir Antropoloji İçin Cevaplar [An invitation to reflexive sociology], translated by Nazlı Ökten. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Boyatzis, Richard E.
1998 Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Chesterman, Andrew
2006 “Questions in the Sociology of Translation.” Translation Studies at the Interface of Disciplines, edited João Ferreira Duarte, Alexandra Assis Rosa, and Teresa Seruya, 9–27. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 
2009 “The Name and Nature of Translator Studies.” Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication Studies 22 (42): 13–22.
Gagnon, Chantal
2006 “Language Plurality as Power Struggle, or: Translating Politics in Canada.” Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 18 (1): 69–90.
Heilbron, Johan
1999 “Towards a Sociology of Translation: Book Translation as a Cultural World-System.” European Journal of Social Theory 2 (4): 429–445.
Gouanvic, Jean-Marc
2005 “A Bourdieusian Theory of Translation, or the Coincidence of Practical Instances: Field, ‘Habitus,’ Capital and ‘Illusio.’” The Translator 11 (2): 147–166.
Inghilleri, Moira
2003 “Habitus, Field and Discourse Interpreting as a Socially Situated Activity.” Target: An International Journal of Translation Studies 15 (2): 243–268.
Kang, Ji-Hae
2009 “Institutional Translation.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, 141–145. London: Routledge.
2014 “Institutions Translated: Discourse, Identity and Power in Institutional Mediation.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 22 (4): 469–478.
Koskinen, Kaisa
2011 “Institutional Translation.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, edited by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, vol. 21, 54–60. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
2008 Translating Institutions. An Ethnographic Study of EU Translation. New York: Routledge.
2014 “Institutional Translation: The Art of Government by Translation.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 22 (4): 479–492.
Lefevere, André
1992 Translating, Rewriting and Manipulation of Literary Fame. London and New York: Routledge.
Mossop, Brian
1988 “Translating Institutions: A Missing Factor in Translation Theory.” TTR: Traduction, Terminologie, Rédaction 1 (2): 65–71.
Schaeffner, Christina
2001 “Translation and the EU: Conditions and Consequences.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology
9
(4): 247–261.
Schäffner, Christina, Luciana Sabina Tcaciuc, and Wine Tesseur
2014 “Translation Practices in Political Institutions: A Comparison of National, Supranational, and Non-Governmental Organisations.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 22 (4): 493–510.
Seçkin, Sevcan
2019 “Türkiye’de kurumsal çeviri alanında kısıtlar/güç ilişkileri, çeviri sosyolojisi odağında üretilen çözümler” [Constraints/power relations in the field of institutional translation in Turkey and solutions produced from the focal point of the sociology of translation]. PhD Diss., Yıldız Technical University, İstanbul.
Simeoni, Daniel
Snell-Hornby, Mary
2010 “The Turns of Translation Studies.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, edited by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, vol. 11, 366–371. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Stolze, Radegundis
2001 “Translating Legal Texts in the EU.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology
9
(4): 301–311.
Tcaciuc, Luciana
2013 “Translation Practices at the European Central Bank with Reference to Metaphors.” PhD, diss., Aston University.
Wolf, Michaela and Alexandra Fukari
Wolf, Michaela
2010 “Sociology of Translation.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, edited by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, vol. 11, 337–344. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.