Cover not available
Article published In:
Museums as Spaces of Cultural Translation and Transfer
Edited by Sophie Decroupet and Irmak Mertens
[Babel 70:5] 2024
► pp. 704–726

“So if you’re going fossil hunting, that’s where you should look”

Popularization for children in science museum websites

 | University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
 | University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Whether directed at adults or children, popularization can be viewed as a process of “translating” and “recontextualizing” expert discourse for a lay audience. In fact, knowledge dissemination for children appears to entail an additional form of “translation,” given their limited background knowledge. This “re-translation” often occurs on dedicated websites based on “edutainment.” While most museum websites function as promotional tools or as agents of knowledge dissemination, a small number of them are targeted at children and offer texts that insert museum objects in a broader context. By means of a small case study, this paper explores how knowledge is popularized and presented in two science museum websites: the Natural History Museum (NHM) in London and OLogy, the science website for children of the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) in New York. From a corpus-linguistic and discourse-analysis perspective, our interest lies in how popularization takes shape in these two websites, the former intended for different age groups and the latter explicitly addressing children. Quantitative and qualitative results show similarities and dissimilarities, thus accounting for different types of popularization as forms of translation. The analysis aims to grant insights to translators and interpreters engaged in museum adaptations and translation of contexts.
Keywords: popularization for children, museum websites, translation, discourse analysis, corpus linguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Popularization in museum websites for children
    • 2.1Museum websites for children
  • 3.Corpus and methodology
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Quantitative analysis
    • 4.2Qualitative analysis
      • 4.2.1Dinosaurs and paleontology in the NHM
      • 4.2.2Paleontology in OLogy
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 May 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00398.sez
References (70)
References
Ames, Michael M. 1992. Cannibal Tours and Glasses Boxes. The Anthropology of Museums. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gail (ed.) 2004. Reinventing the Museum: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on the Paradigm Shift. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Barrière, Caroline, and Fred Popowich. 1996. “Concept Clustering and Knowledge Integration from a Children’s Dictionary.” Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 11, 65–70. Association for Computational Linguistics, USA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barry, Alisa. 2006. “Creating a Virtuous Circle between a Museum’s Online and Physical Spaces.” In Museums and the Web: Proceedings, edited by Jennifer Trant and David Bearman. Toronto: Archives & Museum Informatics. [URL]
Bhatia, Vijay Kumar. 1983. “Simplification v. Easification – The Case of Legal Texts.” Applied Linguistics 4 (1): 42–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bathia, Vijay Kumar, Eleonora Chiavetta, and Silvana Sciarrino, eds. 2015. Variations in Specialised Genres: Standardization and Popularization. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Bell, Alice. 2008. “The Childish Nature of Science: Exploring the Child/Science Relationship in Popular Non-Fiction.” In Science and its Publics: Following Scientists into Popular Culture, edited by Alice Bell, Sarah Davies, and Felicity Mellor, 79–98. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Bondi, Marina. 2009. “Perspective and Position in Museum Websites.” In Point of View: Description and Evaluation across Discourses, edited by Sara Radighieri and Paul Tucker, 113–127. Roma: Officina Edizioni.Google Scholar
. 2018. “Blogs as Interwoven Polylogues.” Language and Dialogue 8 (1): 43–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bondi, Marina, and Jessica Jane Nocella. 2023. “Variations of Polyphony in Blogs. The Case of the Slow Art Day blog.” Language and Dialogue 13 (1): 103–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bongo, Giancarmine, and Giuditta Caliendo, eds. 2014. The Language of Popularization: Theoretical and Descriptive Models / Die Sprache der Popularisierung: Theoretische and Deskriptive Modelle. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruti, Silvia, and Elena Manca. 2019. “The Popularization of Environmental Issues in Children’s Magazines: A Cross-Cultural Corpus Analysis.” In Translating and Communicating Environmental Cultures, edited by Meng Ji, 182–201. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buckingham, David, and Margaret Scanlon. 2004. “Connecting the Family? ‘Edutainment’ Web Sites and Learning in the Home.” Education, Communication & Information 4 (2–3): 271–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Selling Learning: Towards a Political Economy of Edutainment Media.” Media, Culture and Society 27 (1): 41–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calsamiglia, Helena, and Teun van Dijk. 2004. “Popularization Discourse and Knowledge about the Genome.” Discourse & Society 15 (4): 369–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cappelli, Gloria, and Silvia Masi. 2019. “Knowledge Dissemination Through Tourist Guidebooks: Popularization Strategies in English and Italian Guidebooks for Adults and for Children.” In Communicating Specialized Knowledge: Old Genres and New Media, edited by Marina Bondi, Silvia Cacchiani, and Silvia Cavalieri, 124–161. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Cesiri, Daniela. 2020. “Knowledge Dissemination in the Dinosaur Train Animated Series: How to Popularise Palaeontology for Pre-School Children.” Lingue e Linguaggi 401: 95–115.Google Scholar
Chong, Cordelia, and Diantha Smith. 2017. “Interactive Learning Units on Museum Websites.” Journal of Museum Education 42 (2): 169–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ciapuscio, Guimar E. 2003. “Formulation and Reformulation Procedures in Verbal Interactions between Experts and (Semi-)Laypersons.” Discourse Studies 5 (2): 207–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Marchi, Vichi. 2007. “Divulgazione: chi la fa e chi la legge” [Dissemination: Authors and readers]. Liber 731: 7–8.Google Scholar
Diani, Giuliana. 2015. “Exploring Knowledge Dissemination Strategies in English and Italian Newspaper Articles for Children: A Focus on Legal Issues.” Textus 28 (2): 109–126.Google Scholar
. 2018. “Popularization of Legal Knowledge in English and Italian Information Books for Children.” In Popularization and Knowledge Mediation in the Law. / Popularisierung und Wissensvermittlung im Recht, edited by Jan Engberg, Karin Luttermann, Silvia Cacchiani, and Chiara Preite, 291–316. Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Diani, Giuliana, and Annalisa Sezzi. 2019. “The EU for Children: A Case of Web-Mediated Knowledge Dissemination.” In Representing and Redefining Specialised Knowledge: Variety in LSP, edited by Stefania Maci and Michele Sala, 203–221. CERLIS Series 8. Bergamo: Università degli Studi di Bergamo.Google Scholar
. 2020. “Scientific Websites for Children: Nurturing Children’s Scientific Literacy Through the Conflation of Multiple Semiotic Resources.” Journal of Visual Literacy 39 (3–4): 273–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dickey, Jennifer, Samir El Azhar, and Catherine Lewis. 2013. Museums in a Global Context: National Identity, International Understanding. Washington DC: The AAM Press.Google Scholar
Djonov, Emilia. 2005. “Analysing the Organisation of Information in Websites: From Hypermedia Design to Systemic Functional Hypermedia Discourse Analysis.” Ph.D. Diss., University of New South Wales.
. 2008. “Children’s Website Structure and Navigation.” In Multimodal Semiotics: Functional Analysis in Contexts of Education, edited by Len Unsworth, 216–236. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Engberg, Jan, and Karin Luttermann. 2014. “Informationen auf Jugend-Webseiten als Input für Wissenskonstruktion über Recht” [Youth websites as an input for knowledge dissemination on law] Z F A L 60 (1): 67–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engberg, Jan, Karin Luttermann, Silvia Cacchiani, and Chiara Preite. eds. 2018. Popularization and Knowledge Mediation in the Law / Popularisierung und Wissensvermittlung im Recht. Münster: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Fina, Maria Elisa. 2020. “The Sound of Art: Soundscape in Pictorial Descriptions.” Linguae & – Rivista di lingue e culture moderne 11: 173–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garzone, Giuliana. 2014. “News Production and Scientific Knowledge: Exploring Popularization as a Process.” In The Language of Popularization: Theoretical and Descriptive Models / Die Sprache der Popularisierung: Theoretische and Deskriptive Modelle, edited by Giancarmine Bongo and Giuditta Caliendo, 73–110. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio. 1996. “Il linguaggio della divulgazione: problematiche di traduzione intralinguistica” [The language of knowledge dissemination: intralingual translation challenges]. In Tradurre i linguaggi settoriali, edited by Giuseppina Cortese, 217–235. Torino: Cortina.Google Scholar
. 2013. “The Analysis of Popularization Discourse: Conceptual Changes and Methodological Evolution.” In The Popularization of Specialized Discourse and Knowledge across Communities and Cultures, edited by Susan Kermas and Thomas Christiansen, 9–32. Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Reformulation and Recontextualization in Popularization Discourse.” Ibérica 271: 15–34.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Hurtado, Catalina, Claudia Seibel, and Silvia Soler Gallego Silvia. 2012. “Museums for All. Translation and Interpreting for Multimodal Spaces as a Tool for Universal Accessibility.” MonTI 4trans: 349–383.Google Scholar
Kermas, Susan, and Thomas Christiansen, eds. 2013. The Popularization of Specialized Discourse and Knowledge across Communities and Cultures. Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd edition. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinec, Radan, and Andrew Salway. 2005. “A System for Image-Text Relations in New (and Old) Media.” Visual Communication 4 (3): 337–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marty, Paul F. 2007. “Museum Websites and Museum Visitors: Before and After the Museum Visit.” Museum Management and Curatorship 22 (4): 337–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. “Museum Websites and Museum Visitors: Digital Museum Resources and Their Use.” Museum Management and Curatorship 23 (1): 81–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masi, Silvia. 2021. “Translating Non-Fiction Picturebooks for Children Across Age Groups and Languages: The Case of Informative Books on Geography in English and Italian.” Translation Matters. Special Issue: Picturebooks and Graphic Narratives 3 (2): 60–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKay, Susan. 2006. “The Discursive Construction of Health Risk in Magazines: Messages, Registers, and Readers.” In Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis: Oral and Written Contexts, edited by Maurizio Gotti and Francoise Salager-Meyer, 311–330. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Myers, Greg. 1989. “Science for Women and Children: The Dialogue of Popular Science in the Nineteenth Century.” In Nature Transfigured, 1700–1900, edited by John R. R. Christie and Sally Shuttleworth, 171–200. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Discourse Studies of Scientific Popularization: Questioning the Boundaries.” Discourse Studies 5 (2): 265–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’ Donnell, Michael. 2008. “Demonstration of the UAM CorpusTool for text and image annotation.” In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technologies: Demo Session, 13–16. [URL]
Paladin, Luigi, and Laura Pasinetti. 1999. “L’arte della divulgazione. Viaggi nei libri di divulgazione per bambini e ragazzi” [The art of popularization. A journey through popularization books for children and teenagers]. LG Argomenti 21: 14–29.Google Scholar
Perego, Elisa. 2020. Accessible Communication: A Cross-Country Journey. Berlin: Frank & Timme. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peruzzo, Katia. 2021. “Who’s Who in a Court: A Multimodal Exploration of Booklets for Children and Under-18s.” Scripta Manent 16 (1): 42–62.Google Scholar
Puurtineen, Tiina. 1995. Linguistic Acceptability in Translated Children’s Literature. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
Ravelli, Louise J. 2006. Museums Texts: Communication Frameworks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reiss, Katharina. 1982. “Zur bersetzung von Kinder – und Jügendbchern. Theorie und Praxis” [On the translation of children’s and youth books. Theory and practice]. Lebende Sprachen 27 (1): 7–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sabatini, Federico. 2015. “Language, Knowledge and Community in Museum Discourse: Tate and GAM.” ESP Across Cultures 121: 105–126.Google Scholar
Salvi, Rita, and Janet Bowker, eds. 2015. The Dissemination of Contemporary Knowledge in English: Genres, Discourse Strategies and Professional Practices. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sezzi, Annalisa. 2015. “Horrible histories e brutte storie: la traduzione dei libri divulgativi storici.” In Processi evolutivi della traduzione: Formazione, nuove tecnologie e nuovi orizzonti d’analisi, edited by Luciana Soliman, Giuseppe Palumbo, and Ivana Palandri, 83–102. Roma: Officina Edizioni.Google Scholar
. 2017. “History Is Horrible. Especially in Schools’: Remediating History Books for Children in Translation.” In The Many Facets of Remediation in Language Studies, edited by Michela Canepari, Gillian Manfield, and Franca Poppi, Franca, 447–466. Beau Bassin: Lambert Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2019. “Go on an Art Adventure: Popularizing Art for Children Through Museum Websites.” In Communicating Specialized Knowledge: Old Genres and New Media, edited by Marina Bondi, Silvia Cacchiani, and Silvia Cavalieri, 162–177. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2022. “Wasted world o sporco mondo: tradurre i testi divulgativi per ragazzi sull’ambiente.” Italica Wratislaviensia 13 (1): 165–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silletti, Alida. 2017. “L’UE Expliquée aux Enfants: Le Coin des Enfants” [The EU explained to children: Children’s corner]. In L’Europe dans les Medias en Ligne, edited by Luciana Radut-Gaghi, Denisa A. Oprea, and Axel Boursier, 157–176. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Sturge, Kate. 2007. Representing Others Translation, Ethnography and Museum. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tang, Ramona, and John Suganthi. 1999. “The ‘I’ in Identity: Exploring Writer Identity in Student Academic Writing Through the First-Person Pronoun.” English for Specific Purposes 181: 23–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, Jim, Cynthia Waddell, Shawn Henry, Sarah Swierenga, Mark Urban, Michael Burks, and Paul Bohman. 2002. Constructing Accessible Web Sites. Berkeley, CA: Apress. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, Len. 2005. “Comparing School Science Explanations in Books and Computer-Based Formats: The Role of Images, Image/Text Relations and Hyperlinks.” International Journal of Instructional Media 31 (3): 283–301.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Image/Text Relations and Intersemiosis: Towards Multimodal Text Description for Multiliteracies Education.” Proceedings of the 33rd International Systemic Functional Congress (33rd ISFC), Sao Paulo, Brazil, Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica De Sao Paulo (PUCSP), 1165–1205.Google Scholar
Vasta, Nicoletta, and Piergiorgio Trevisan. 2017. “Who Cares About Children’s Rights? Critical Multimodal Awareness and its Implications for the Design, Analysis and Use of Children’s Online Educational Materials.” Le Simplegadi XV (17): 100–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wozniak, Monika M. 2021. “Ecoliteracy in Translation: Verbal and Visual Transfer in the Italian Version of Emilia Dziubak’s Picturebook Draka Ekonieboraka.” Translation Matters. Special Issue: Picturebooks and Graphic Narratives 3 (2): 75–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Sumin. 2008. “From Her World to Our World: Making History on a Children’s Website.” Literacy Learning: The Middle Years 16 (2): 44–52.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Intersemiotic Relations as Logogenetic Patterns: Towards the Restoration of the Time Dimension in Hypertext Description.” In New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation, edited by Monika Bednarek and James R. Martin, 195–218. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Learning through Multimedia Interaction: The Construal of Primary Social Science Knowledge on Web-based E-texts.” Ph.D. Diss. University of Sydney.