Article published in:
Translation Practice in the Field: Current research on socio-cognitive processes
Edited by Hanna Risku, Regina Rogl and Jelena Milosevic
[Benjamins Current Topics 105] 2019
► pp. 61–77

Experiencing the interpreter’s role

Emotions of involvement and detachment in simultaneous church interpreting

This paper proposes an affective approach to examining the interpreter’s role. More specifically, it suggests that, by considering the interpreters’ subjective feelings of involvement and detachment related to an interpreted event, we can examine the ways in which their role is constructed, within and through a combination of personal, social, and material factors related to the setting and the interpreter’s working conditions. As an example, I take the case of simultaneous interpreting in two religious settings, which I have studied with autoethnography. Thus, I analyze my experiences of interpreting in two religious settings and contrast these experiences to an “ideal” model of the interpreter’s role in such settings: that of the fully involved participant. The analysis indicates that, while an internalized ideal model of role may provide a point of reference for reflection, the actual experience of role emerges in a complicated interaction between personal, social, and material aspects.
Keywords: affect, interpreter involvement, detachment, interpreter’s role, church interpreting, simultaneous interpreting, autoethnography
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Interpreter’s role from an affective perspective
  • 3.Method and research material
  • 4.Social settings: Simultaneous interpreting in two religious contexts
  • 5.The affectivity of involvement and detachment in simultaneous church interpreting
    • 5.1Involvement (and detachment) when interpreting in the PCS
    • 5.2(Involvement and) detachment when interpreting at the FLC summer conference
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 07 August 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.105.04hok
References
Angelelli, Claudia
2004a Medical Interpreting and Cross-Cultural Communication. London: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004b Revisiting the Interpreter’s Role: A Study of Conference, Court, and Medical Interpreters in Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Ethnographic Methods.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, edited by F. Pöchhacker, 148–150. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Balcı Tison, Alev
2016 The Interpreter’s Involvement in a Translated Institution: A Case Study of Sermon Interpreting. Doctoral dissertation, Rovira i Virigili University, Spain.Google Scholar
Barbalet, Jack
2002 “Introduction: Why Emotions Are Crucial.” In Emotions and Sociology, edited by J. Barbalet, 1–9. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Berk-Seligson, Susan
1990 The Bilingual Courtroom. Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bot, Hanneke
2005 Dialogue Interpreting in Mental Health. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Bowie, Fiona
2003 “An Anthropology of Religious Experience: Spirituality, Gender and Cultural Transmission in the Focolare Movement.” ETHNOS 68 (1): 49–72. Crossref.Google Scholar
Bruner, Edward M.
1986 “Introduction. Experience and its Expressions.” In The Anthropology of Experience, edited by Victor W. Turner and Edward M. Bruner, 3–30. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Camayd-Freixas, Erik
2013 “Court Interpreter Ethics and the Role of Professional Organizations.” In Interpreting in a Changing Landscape, edited by C. Schäffner, K. Kredens, and Y. Fowler, 15–13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Heewon
2008 Autoethnography as Method. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Jules
2013 “One Job Too Many? The Challenges Facing the Workplace Interpreter.” In Interpreting in a Changing Landscape, edited by C. Schäffner, K. Kredens, and Y. Fowler, 133–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diriker, Ebru
2004 De-/Re-Contextualizing Conference Interpreting: Interpreters in the Ivory Tower? Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Agency in Conference Interpreting: Still a Myth?” Gramma: Journal of Theory and Criticism 19: 27–36. Accessed February 17, 2017. http://​www​.enl​.auth​.gr​/gramma​/gramma11​/Diriker​.pdf.
Downie, Jonathan
2014 “Towards a Homiletic of Sermon Interpreting.” Journal of the Evangelical Homiletics Society 14 (2): 62–69.Google Scholar
Ellis, Carolyn, and Arthur P. Bochner
2000 “Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, second edition, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 733–768. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Emerson, Robert M., Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw
1995 Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Furmanek, Olgierda
2006 “The Role of Emotions in Establishing Meaning: Implications for Interpreting.” Journal of Specialized Translation 5: 57–71. Accessed February 17, 2017. http://​www​.jostrans​.org​/issue05​/art​_furmanek​.pdf.
Grbić, Nadja
2010 “ ‘Boundary Work’ as a Concept for Studying Professionalization Processes in the Interpreting Field.” Translation and Interpreting Studies 5 (1): 109–123. Crossref.Google Scholar
Hale, Sandra, and Jemina Napier
2013 Research Methods in Interpreting: A Practical Resource. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Herz, Rosanna
1997 Reflexivity and Voice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hokkanen, Sari
2012 “Simultaneous Church Interpreting as Service.” The Translator 18 (2): 291–309. Crossref.Google Scholar
2016 To Serve and to Experience: An Autoethnographic Study of Simultaneous Church Interpreting. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tampere. Accessed October 11, 2016. https://​tampub​.uta​.fi​/handle​/10024​/99865.
Hokkanen, Sari, and Kaisa Koskinen
2016 “Affect as a Hinge: The Translator’s Experiencing Self as a Sociocognitive Interface.” Translation Spaces 5 (1): 78–96. Crossref.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ellis
2010 “Confessions of Belonging: My Emotional Journey as a Medical Translator.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (10): 783–791. Crossref.Google Scholar
Karlik, Jill
2010 “Interpreter-Mediated Scriptures: Expectation and Performance.” Interpreting 12 (2): 160–185. Crossref.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Francine
2005 “Contribution à l’histoire de l’interprétation consecutive : le metourgemane dans les synagogues de l’Antiquité.” Meta 50 (3): 972–986. Crossref.Google Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Veli-Matti
2001 “Church as Charismatic Fellowship: Ecclesiological Reflections from the Pentecostal-Roman Catholic Dialogue.” Journal of Pentecostal Theology 18: 100–121. Crossref.Google Scholar
Lutz, Catherine, and Geoffrey M. White
1986 “The Anthropology of Emotions.” Annual Review of Anthropology 15: 405–436. Crossref.Google Scholar
Muñoz Martín, Ricardo
2010 “On Paradigms and Cognitive Translatology.” In Translation and Cognition, edited by G. M. Shreve and E. Angelone, 169–187. Philadephia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Napier, Jemina
2011 “If a Tree Falls in the Forest, Does It Make a Noise? The Merits of Publishing Interpreting Research.” In Advances in Interpreting Research: Inquiry in Action, edited by B. Nichodemus and L. Swabey, 121–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Timothy J.
2005 Every Time I Feel the Spirit: Religious Experience, Ritual, and Emotion in an African American Church. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Ortiz Soriano, Adela
2015 “Impartiality in Police Interpreting.” English translation of the author’s article “La imparcialidad en la interpretación policial.” MonTI 7: 207–241. Crossref.Google Scholar
Parrott, W. Gerrod, and Rom Harré
1996 “Overview.” In The Emotions: Social, Cultural and Biological Dimensions, edited by R. Harré and W. G. Parrott, 1–20. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, Donald
1988 Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Risku, Hanna
2010 “A Cognitive Scientific View on Technical Communication and Translation: Do Embodiment and Situatedness Really Make a Difference?” Target 22 (1): 94–111. Crossref.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle Z.
1984 “Toward an Anthropology of Self and Feeling.” In Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion, edited by R. A. Shweder and R. A. LeVine, 135–157. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roy, Cynthia B.
2000 Interpreting as a Discourse Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stark, Rodney, and Charles Y. Glock
1968 American Piety: The Nature of Religious Commitment. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tracy, Sarah J.
2010 “Qualitative Quality: Eight ‘Big-Tent’ Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (10): 837–885. Crossref.Google Scholar
Vigouroux, Cécile B.
2010 “Double-Mouthed Discourse: Interpreting, Framing, and Participant Roles.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 14 (3): 341–369. Crossref.Google Scholar
Wadensjö, Cecilia
1998 Interpreting as Interaction. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Wetherell, Margaret
2012 Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar