Cover not available
Part of
(Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions
Edited by Chaoqun Xie
[Benjamins Current Topics 107] 2020
► pp. 99–123

Impoliteness and the moral order in online gaming

In recent years, eSports, online gaming, and live computer game streaming have grown into a global, multi-million dollar industry. In the context of online gaming, however, there is a prevailing moral order (Kádár 2017) that allows and perhaps even encourages impoliteness against female gamers, positioning them as inferior, unwelcome, or peripheral. Drawing from a corpus of over 150 hours of live game streams and concurrent open-forum chat, this study identifies rituals and tropes (such as spam and banter) that reinforce gendered practices as they relate to the moral order in the online gaming setting. It then explores strategies used by one female gamer to manipulate the expectations of the online gaming medium and its hegemonic notions of femininity. In this way, she can resist a moral order which positions her as disempowered, and thereby gain social capital within the community.
Keywords: multimodal, impoliteness, digital communication, moral order, computer-mediated communication, gender
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research
    • 2.1Game studies
    • 2.2The moral order and rules of games
  • 3.Data and methods
    • 3.1Ritual and moral order in the venue of online gaming
    • 3.2Data
    • 3.3Methods
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Rules as markers of the moral order
    • 4.2Being a “boobie streamer”
    • 4.3Rituals that reflect the moral order
      • 4.3.1Ritual One: Choosing champions
      • 4.3.2Ritual two: Spam
      • 4.3.3Ritual three: “Boobie banter”
    • 4.4Objectification versus morality
  • 5.Discussion and further directions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 June 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.107.ip.00014.lam
References (36)
References
Brehm, Audrey. 2013. “Navigating the feminine in massive multiplayer online games: Gender in World of Warcraft .” Frontiers in Psychology 4 (Article 903): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cote, Amanda C. 2017. “‘I can defend myself’: Women’s strategies for coping with harassment while gaming online.” Games and Culture 12(2): 136–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Anastacio, Cecilia. 2016. “The mum who moderates her daughter’s Rowdy Twitch chat.” Kotaku UK. [URL] (accessed 8 January 2018).
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1992. “Communities of practice: Where language, gender and power all live.” In Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, ed. by Kira Hall, Mary Buchholtz, and Birch Moonwomon, 89–99. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, University of California.Google Scholar
Ensslin, Astrid. 2012. The Language of Gaming. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Entertainment Software Association. 2017. “Essential facts about the computer and video game industry.” [URL] (accessed 2 February 2018).
Gee, John P. 2015. Unified Discourse Analysis: Language, Reality, Virtual Worlds, and Video Games. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Graham, Sage L. 2008. “A manual for impoliteness?: The impact of the FAQ in an electronic community of practice.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 281–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2016. “Relationality, friendship and identity.” In Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 305–320. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
2017. “Politeness and impoliteness.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffman, and Wolfram Bublitz, 459–491. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. “Interaction and conflict in digital communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Conflict, ed. by Leslie Jeffries, and Jim O’Driscoll. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, Sage L., and Scott Dutt. 2019. “‘Watch the potty mouth’: Negotiating impoliteness in online gaming.” In Approaches to Videogame Discourse: Lexis, Interaction, Textuality, ed. by Astrid Ensslin, and Isabel Balteiro. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Kishonna L. 2012. “Intersecting oppressions and online communities: Examining the experiences of women of color in Xbox Live.” Information, Communication and Society 15(3): 411–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heyd, Teresa. 2013. “Email hoaxes.” In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. by Susan Herring, Deiter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 387–410. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lavé, Jean, and Ettienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. 2013. “Relational work and interpersonal pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 58: 138–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam, and Sage L. Graham. 2010. “Introduction to interpersonal pragmatics.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. by Miriam A. Locher, and Sage L. Graham, 1–13. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts. 2005. “Politeness theory and relational work.” Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 9–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 77–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maher, Brenden. 2016. “Can a video game company tame toxic behavior?” Nature 531: 568–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsden, Elizabeth, and Daniel Z. Kádár. 2017. “The pragmatics of mimesis: A case study of intercultural email communication.” Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice 4(1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massanari, Adrienne. 2017. “#Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures.” New Media and Society 19(3): 329–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Meghan. 2015. “Anita Sarkeesian’s new video takes on male entitlement.” Feminist Current. [URL] (accessed 9 February 2018).
Newon, Lisa. 2011. “Multimodal creativity and identities of expertise in the digital ecology of a World of Warcraft guild.” In Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media, ed. by Crispin Thurlow, and Kristine Mroczek, 131–153. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Online multiplayer games.” In Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 289–304. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. 1981. Fighting for Life: Contest, Sexuality, and Consciousness. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Patrick, Aston. 2018. “Ur so hawt: The presentation of gender in online streaming.” Quaesitum Undergraduate Research Journal 5: 162–191.Google Scholar
Riot Games. 2015–2017. League of Legends. Los Angeles: Riot Games, Inc.Google Scholar
Rockstar. 1997–2009. Grand Theft Auto. New York: Rockstar Games.Google Scholar
Salter, Michael. 2018. “From geek masculinity to Gamergate: the technological rationality of online abuse.” Crime Media Culture 14(2): 247–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salter, Anastasia, and Bridget Blodgett. 2017. Toxic Geek Masculinity in Media: Sexism, Trolling, and Identity Policing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, Patricia. 2014. “Business of being a female gamer.” Geeks. [URL] (accessed 8 January 2018).
Sarkeesian, Anita. 2016. “All the slender ladies: Body diversity in video games.” [URL] (accessed 1 April 2018).
Shaw, Adrienne. 2011. “Do you identify as a gamer? Gender, race, sexuality, and gamer identity.” New Media and Society 14(1): 28–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 2002. “Agonism in academic discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1651–1669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar