Examining incidental vocabulary acquisition from captioned video
Does test modality matter?
Previous comparisons of vocabulary uptake from captioned and uncaptioned audio-visual materials have almost consistently furnished evidence in favour of captioned materials. However, it is possible that many such comparative studies gave an advantage to the captioned input conditions by virtue of their use of written word prompts in the tests. The present study therefore examines whether aurally presented test prompts yield equally compelling evidence for the superiority of captioned over uncaptioned video. Intermediate EFL learners watched a ten-minute TED Talks video either with or without captions and were subsequently given a word recognition and a word meaning test, with half of the test prompts presented in print and the other half presented aurally. While the results of the word recognition test were inconclusive, the word meaning test yielded significantly better scores by the group that watched the captioned video. However, this was due entirely to their superior scores on the printed word prompts, not the aural ones. This suggests that evaluations of the benefits of captions for vocabulary acquisitions should take input-modality – test-modality congruency into account.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 3.Research questions
- 4.Method
- 4.1Participants
- 4.2Materials
- 4.3Procedures
- 5.Results and discussion
- 5.1Comprehension of the video content
- 5.2Word recognition
- 5.3Orthographic representations
- 5.4Word meaning
- 6.Conclusion and limitations
-
References
-
Appendix
References (50)
References
Baltova, I. (1994). The impact of video on the comprehension skills of core French students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 507–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bisson, M. -J., Van Heuven, W. J. B., Conklin, K., & Tunney, R. (2014). Processing of native and foreign language subtitles in films: An eye tracking study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 693–713.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borras, I., & Lafayette, R. C. (1994). Effects of multimedia courseware subtitling on the speaking performance of college students of French. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 61–75. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, R., Waring, R., & Donkaewbua, S. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading a Foreign Language, 20, 136–163.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chai, J., & Erlam, R. (2008). The effect and the influence of the use of video and captions on second language learning. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 14, 25–44.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chang, A. -C., & Read, J. (2013). Investigating the effects of multiple-choice listening test items in the oral versus written mode on L2 listeners’ performance and perceptions. System, 41, 575–586. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coxhead, A. J., & Walls, R. (2012). TED Talks, vocabulary, and listening for EAP. The TESOLANZ Journal, 20, 55–58.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freeborn, D. (2006). From Old English to Standard English (3rd ed.). Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goh, C. C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55–75. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond A Clockwork Orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11, 207–223.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hulstijn, J. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automacity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 258–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
King, J. (2002). Using DVD feature films in the EFL classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15, 509–523. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laufer, B. (1997). What’s in a word that makes it hard or easy? Intralexical factors affecting the difficulty of vocabulary acquisition. In M. McCarthy & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Vocabulary description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 140–155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laufer, B. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 567–587. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markham, P. (1999). Captioned videotapes and second-language listening word recognition. Foreign Language Annals, 32, 321–327. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montero Perez, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Desmet, P. (2013). Captioned video for L2 listening and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. System, 41, 720–739. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., Clarebout, G., & Desmet, P. (2014). Effects of captioning on video comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 18, 118–141.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., & Desmet, P. (2015). Enhancing vocabulary learning through captioned video: An eye-tracking study. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 308–328. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nation, I. S. P., & Heatley, A. (2002). Range: A Program for the Analysis of Vocabulary in Texts. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Neuman, B., & Koshinen, P. (1992). Captioned television as comprehensible input: Effects of incidental word learning from context for language minority students. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 96–106. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peters, E., Heynen, E., & Puimege, E. (2016). Learning vocabulary through audiovisual input: The differential effect of L1 subtitles and captions. System, 63, 134–148. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pigada, M., & Schmitt, N. (2006). Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18, 1–28.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodgers, M. (2013). English language learning through viewing television: An investigation of comprehension, incidental vocabulary acquisition, lexical coverage, attitudes, and captions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodgers, M. P. H., & Webb, S. (2011). Narrow viewing: The vocabulary in related television programs. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 689–717. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodgers, M. P. H., & Webb, S. (2017). The effects of captions of EFL learners’ comprehension of English-language television programs. Calico Journal, 34, 20–38. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. London: Pearson Education.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapman, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18, 55–88. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scotto di Carlo, G. (2014). The role of proximity in online popularizations: The case of TED talks, Discourse Studies, 16, 591–606. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sydorenko, T. (2010). Modality of input and vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 14, 50–73.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Takaesu, A. (2013). TED Talks as an extensive listening resource for EAP students. Language Education in Asia, 4, 150–162. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taylor, G. (2005). Perceived processing strategies of students watching captioned video. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 422–427. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tulving, E. (1993). What is episodic memory? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 67–70. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Zeeland, H. (2013). Vocabulary and listening. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of applied linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics, 1–24.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013) Incidental vocabulary acquisition through L2 listening: A dimensions approach. System, 41, 609–624. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191–210. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vanderplank, R. (2010). Déjà vu? A decade of research on language laboratories, television and video in language learning. Language teaching, 43, 1–37. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vidal, K. (2003). Academic listening: A source of vocabulary acquisition? Applied Linguistics, 24, 56–89. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vidal, K. (2011). A comparison of the effects of reading and listening on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 61, 219–258. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Waring, R., & Takaki, M. (2003). At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader? Reading a Foreign Language, 15, 130–163.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Webb, S. (2008). The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 232–245.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Webb, S. (2014a). Repetition in Incidental Vocabulary Learning. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of applied linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Webb, S. (2015). Extensive viewing: Language learning through watching television. In D. Nunan & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Language learning beyond the classroom (pp. 159–168). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2009). Vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning, 59, 335–366. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Webb, S., Sasao, Y., & Ballance, O. (2017). The updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168, 34–70.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T. (2010). The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning & Technology, 14, 65–86.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T. (2013). Factors influencing the use of captions by foreign language learners: An eye-tracking study. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 254–275. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Wang, Qiang, Yunfeng Zhang, Kimberly Kolletar-Zhu, Xiaoshu Xu, Liang Zhao & Manoj Kumar
2022.
Effect of Focus on Form on Vocabulary Acquisition in Computer-Assisted Learning.
Mobile Information Systems 2022
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.