Chapter published in:
Approaches to Learning, Testing and Researching L2 Vocabulary
Edited by Stuart Webb
[Benjamins Current Topics 109] 2020
► pp. 169–189

Examining incidental vocabulary acquisition from captioned video

Does test modality matter?

| SMK Rantau Panjang
| The University of Western Ontario

Previous comparisons of vocabulary uptake from captioned and uncaptioned audio-visual materials have almost consistently furnished evidence in favour of captioned materials. However, it is possible that many such comparative studies gave an advantage to the captioned input conditions by virtue of their use of written word prompts in the tests. The present study therefore examines whether aurally presented test prompts yield equally compelling evidence for the superiority of captioned over uncaptioned video. Intermediate EFL learners watched a ten-minute TED Talks video either with or without captions and were subsequently given a word recognition and a word meaning test, with half of the test prompts presented in print and the other half presented aurally. While the results of the word recognition test were inconclusive, the word meaning test yielded significantly better scores by the group that watched the captioned video. However, this was due entirely to their superior scores on the printed word prompts, not the aural ones. This suggests that evaluations of the benefits of captions for vocabulary acquisitions should take input-modality – test-modality congruency into account.

Keywords: test modality, captions, vocabulary acquisition, TED Talks, audio-visual input
Published online: 06 August 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.109.itl.00011.jel
References

References

Baltova, I.
(1994) The impact of video on the comprehension skills of core French students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 507–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barcroft, J.
(2015) Lexical input processing and vocabulary learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bisson, M. -J., Van Heuven, W. J. B., Conklin, K., & Tunney, R.
(2014) Processing of native and foreign language subtitles in films: An eye tracking study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 693–713.Google Scholar
Borras, I., & Lafayette, R. C.
(1994) Effects of multimedia courseware subtitling on the speaking performance of college students of French. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 61–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., Waring, R., & Donkaewbua, S.
(2008) Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading a Foreign Language, 20, 136–163.Google Scholar
Chai, J., & Erlam, R.
(2008) The effect and the influence of the use of video and captions on second language learning. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 14, 25–44.Google Scholar
Chang, A. -C., & Read, J.
(2013) Investigating the effects of multiple-choice listening test items in the oral versus written mode on L2 listeners’ performance and perceptions. System, 41, 575–586. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A. J., & Walls, R.
(2012) TED Talks, vocabulary, and listening for EAP. The TESOLANZ Journal, 20, 55–58.Google Scholar
Freeborn, D.
(2006) From Old English to Standard English (3rd ed.). Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goh, C. C.
(2000) A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P.
(1998) Beyond A Clockwork Orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11, 207–223.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J.
(2001) Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automacity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 258–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
King, J.
(2002) Using DVD feature films in the EFL classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15, 509–523. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B.
(1997) What’s in a word that makes it hard or easy? Intralexical factors affecting the difficulty of vocabulary acquisition. In M. McCarthy & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Vocabulary description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 140–155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 567–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markham, P.
(1999) Captioned videotapes and second-language listening word recognition. Foreign Language Annals, 32, 321–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montero Perez, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Desmet, P.
(2013) Captioned video for L2 listening and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. System, 41, 720–739. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., Clarebout, G., & Desmet, P.
(2014) Effects of captioning on video comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 18, 118–141.Google Scholar
Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., & Desmet, P.
(2015) Enhancing vocabulary learning through captioned video: An eye-tracking study. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 308–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J.
(1977) Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P., & Heatley, A.
(2002) Range: A Program for the Analysis of Vocabulary in Texts. Retrieved from http://​www​.victoria​.ac​.nz​/lals​/about​/staff​/paul​-nation
Neuman, B., & Koshinen, P.
(1992) Captioned television as comprehensible input: Effects of incidental word learning from context for language minority students. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 96–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E., Heynen, E., & Puimege, E.
(2016) Learning vocabulary through audiovisual input: The differential effect of L1 subtitles and captions. System, 63, 134–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pigada, M., & Schmitt, N.
(2006) Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18, 1–28.Google Scholar
Rodgers, M.
(2013) English language learning through viewing television: An investigation of comprehension, incidental vocabulary acquisition, lexical coverage, attitudes, and captions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Rodgers, M. P. H., & Webb, S.
(2011) Narrow viewing: The vocabulary in related television programs. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 689–717. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) The effects of captions of EFL learners’ comprehension of English-language television programs. Calico Journal, 34, 20–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rost, M.
(2002) Teaching and researching listening. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapman, C.
(2001) Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18, 55–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scotto di Carlo, G.
(2014) The role of proximity in online popularizations: The case of TED talks, Discourse Studies, 16, 591–606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweller, J.
(1994) Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sydorenko, T.
(2010) Modality of input and vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 14, 50–73.Google Scholar
Takaesu, A.
(2013) TED Talks as an extensive listening resource for EAP students. Language Education in Asia, 4, 150–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G.
(2005) Perceived processing strategies of students watching captioned video. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 422–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tulving, E.
(1993) What is episodic memory? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 67–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Zeeland, H.
(2013) Vocabulary and listening. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of applied linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N.
(2012) Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics, 1–24.Google Scholar
(2013) Incidental vocabulary acquisition through L2 listening: A dimensions approach. System, 41, 609–624. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, L.
(2007) Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanderplank, R.
(2010) Déjà vu? A decade of research on language laboratories, television and video in language learning. Language teaching, 43, 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, K.
(2003) Academic listening: A source of vocabulary acquisition? Applied Linguistics, 24, 56–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) A comparison of the effects of reading and listening on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 61, 219–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waring, R., & Takaki, M.
(2003) At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader? Reading a Foreign Language, 15, 130–163.Google Scholar
Webb, S.
(2008) The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 232–245.Google Scholar
(2014a) Repetition in Incidental Vocabulary Learning. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of applied linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Extensive viewing: Language learning through watching television. In D. Nunan & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Language learning beyond the classroom (pp. 159–168). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. H.
(2009) Vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning, 59, 335–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., Sasao, Y., & Ballance, O.
(2017) The updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168, 34–70.Google Scholar
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T.
(2010) The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning & Technology, 14, 65–86.Google Scholar
(2013) Factors influencing the use of captions by foreign language learners: An eye-tracking study. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 254–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar