Cover not available
Part of
Approaches to Learning, Testing and Researching L2 Vocabulary
Edited by Stuart Webb
[Benjamins Current Topics 109] 2020
► pp. 213–232

Vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension at an intermediate level in English and French as foreign languages

An approximate replication study of Stæhr (2009)

| KU Leuven | ITEC – Kuleuven – imec
| KU Leuven
| KU Leuven
| ITEC – Kuleuven – imec
| KU Leuven

The present study aims to replicate Stæhr’s (2009) study on the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension. To explore the generalizability of Stæhr’s findings, two experiments were conducted. However, the study changed the population (Flemish learners) and proficiency level of the materials in the first experiment (intermediate) and also the language in the second experiment (French). Our results generally confirm Stæhr’s findings. We also found a positive correlation between vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension. Although our findings reveal that learners probably need fewer words for adequate listening comprehension at an intermediate proficiency level, our study also showed that learners who knew more words had higher listening comprehension scores. Finally, our study seems to suggest that learners might need less lexical coverage for intermediate listening.

Keywords: vocabulary knowledge, listening comprehension, intermediate level, English as a foreign language, French as a foreign language
Article outline
  • 1.Background
    • 1.1The original study
    • 1.2Importance of the problem
    • 1.3Relevant scholarship
    • 1.4Statement of purpose
  • 2.Research questions
  • 3.Experiment 1: English
    • 3.1Method
      • 3.1.1Participants
      • 3.1.2Materials
        • 3.1.2.1Listening comprehension test for English: Preliminary English Test for schools (PET)
        • 3.1.2.2Receptive vocabulary test
      • 3.1.3Procedure
      • 3.1.4Scoring and analyses
    • 3.2Results
      • 3.2.1Descriptive statistics
      • 3.2.2To what extent is vocabulary knowledge associated with listening comprehension?
      • 3.2.3How much vocabulary is needed for adequate listening comprehension?
  • 4.Experiment 2: French
    • 4.1Method
      • 4.1.1Participants
      • 4.1.2Materials
        • 4.1.2.1Listening comprehension test for French: Diplôme d’études en langue française (DELF)
        • 4.1.2.2Receptive vocabulary test
      • 4.1.3Procedure
      • 4.1.4Scoring and analyses
    • 4.2Results
      • 4.2.1Descriptive statistics
      • 4.2.2To what extent is vocabulary knowledge associated with listening comprehension?
      • 4.2.3How much vocabulary is needed for adequate listening comprehension?
    • 4.3The relationship between vocabulary and listening comprehension
    • 4.4How much vocabulary is needed for adequate listening comprehension?
  • 5.Limitations
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.109.itl.00013.nor
References
Adolphs, S., & Schmitt, N.
(2003) Lexical coverage of spoken discourse. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 425–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonk, W.
(2000) Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14(1), 14–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cobb, T.
n.d.) Compleat lexical tutor. Retrieved from [URL]
Council of Europe
(2001) Common European framework of reference for languages; Learning, teaching, assessment.Google Scholar
Dang, T. N. Y., & Webb, S.
(2014) English for specific purposes. The lexical profile of academic spoken English. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 66–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
(2008) Corpus of Contemporary American English. Retrieved from [URL]
European Commission
(2012) The European survey on language competences.Google Scholar
Elgort, I.
(2013) Effects of L1 definitions and cognate status of test items on the Vocabulary Size Test. Language Testing, 30(2), 253–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Levitzky-Aviad, T.
(2018) Loanword proportion in vocabulary size tests: Does it make a difference? ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169(1), 95–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & McLean, S.
(2016) Loanwords and vocabulary size test scores: A case of different estimates for different L1 learners. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(3), 202–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Londsdale, D., & Le Bras, Y.
(2009) A frequency dictionary of French core vocabulary for learners. Londen: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milton, J.
(2009) Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P.
(2006) How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, E., Velghe, T., & Van Rompaey, T.
(2015, May) A post-entry English and French vocabulary size for Flemish learners. Paper presented at EALTA. Copenhagen, Denmark.
Plonsky, L., & Derrick, D. J.
(2016) A meta-analysis of reliability coefficients in second language research. Modern Language Journal, 100(2), 538–553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Porte, G.
(2012) Introduction. In G. Porte (Ed.), Replication research in applied linguistics (pp.1–17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Read, J.
(1993) The development of a new measure of vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 10(3), 355–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., Cobb, R., Horst, M. & Schmitt, D.
(2017) How much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of van Zeeland & Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and Cobb (2007). Language Teaching, 50(2), 212–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D. & Clapham, C.
(2001) Developing and exploring the behavior of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18, 55–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stæhr, L.
(2009) Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 577–607. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N.
(2013) Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 457–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar