Part of
Teacher Development for Immersion and Content-Based Instruction
Edited by Laurent Cammarata and T.J. Ó Ceallaigh
[Benjamins Current Topics 110] 2020
► pp. 171195
References
Arnott, S., Brogden, L. M., Faez, F., Peguret, M., Piccardo, E., Rehner, K., Taylor, S. K., & Wernicke, M.
(2017) The Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) in Canada: A research agenda. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20 (1), 31–54.Google Scholar
Arnott, S., & Vignola, M. J.
(2018) Using a language portfolio in FSL teacher education: Student and instructor perspectives. Paper presentation at the conference of the Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics, Regina, SK, 29 May 2018.
Association canadienne des professionnels de l’immersion, ACPI
(2018) Rapport final: Consultation pancanadienne. Journal de l'immersion, 40(2), 6–31.Google Scholar
Bayliss, D., & Vignola, M. J.
(2007) Training non-native second language teachers: The case of anglophone FSL teacher candidates. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63 (3), 371–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Assessing language proficiency of FSL candidates: What makes a successful candidate? Canadian Modern Language Review, 57 (2), 217–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergil, A. S., & Sariçoban, A.
(2017) The use of EPOSTL to determine the self-efficacy of prospective EFL teachers: Raising awareness in English language teacher education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13 (1), 399–411.Google Scholar
Bournot-Trites, M.
(2008) Vision pour le soutien des acquis linguistiques des enseignants de FLS. Revue Canadienne de Linguistique Appliquée, 11 (1), 21–39.Google Scholar
Burkert, A., & Schwienhorst, K.
(2008) Focus on the student teacher: The European portfolio for student teachers of languages (EPOSTL) as a tool to develop teacher autonomy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2 (3), 238–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cakir, A., & Balcikanli, C.
(2012) The use of the European portfolio for student teachers of languages (EPOSTL) to foster teacher autonomy: English language teaching (ELT) student teachers’ and teacher trainers’ views. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37 (3), 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canadian Parents for French
(2014) French second language programs and student performance. [URL]
(2017) French second language enrolment statistics: 2011–12 to 2015–16. [URL]
Carr, W.
(2010) Raising FLAGS: Renewing core French at the pre-service teacher level. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13 (1), 37–51.Google Scholar
Centre for Applied Second Language Studies (University of Oregon)
(2017) Linguafolio Online. [URL]
Christiansen, H., & Laplante, B.
(2004) Second language pre-service teachers as learners: The language portfolio project. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 60 (4), 439–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
(2001) A Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [URL]
(2017a) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors. [URL]
(2017b) Developing an ELP. [URL]
Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC)
(2010) L’exploitation du Cadre européen commun de référence pour les langues (CECR) dans le contexte canadien: Guide à l’intention des responsables de l’élaboration des politiques et des concepteurs de programmes d’études. [URL]
Creswell, J. W.
(2012) Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Day, E. M., & Shapson, S.
(1996) A national survey: French Immersion teachers’ preparation and their professional development needs. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 52 , 248–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donato, R., & McCormick, D.
(1994) A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation. Modern Language Journal, 78 , 453–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ElAtia, S., & Lemaire, E.
(2013) Engager les apprenants dans l’auto-évaluation de leurs productions écrites: Le cas du portfolio d’erreurs. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16 (1), 111–134.Google Scholar
Faez, F.
(2011) Points of departure: Developing the knowledge base of ESL and FSL teachers for K-12 programs in Canada. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14 (1), 29–49.Google Scholar
Flewelling, J.
(1995) Addressing the challenge for FSL teachers: How to maintain and improve language, pedagogical skills and cultural knowledge. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 52 (1), 22–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagné, A., & Thomas, R.
(2011) Language portfolio design for a concurrent teacher education program in Ontario. Synergies Europe, 6 , 219–228.Google Scholar
Karsenti, T., Collin, S., Villeneuve, S., Dumouchel, G., & Roy, N.
(2008) Why are new French immersion and French as a second language teachers leaving the profession? Results of a Canada-wide survey. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association of Immersion Teachers.Google Scholar
Lapkin, S., MacFarlane, A., & Vandergrift, L.
(2006) Teaching French in Canada: FSL teachers’ perspectives. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Teachers’ Federation.Google Scholar
Laplante, B. & Christiansen, H.
(2001) Portfolio langagier en français. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57 (3), 495–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazaruk, W.
(2007) Avantages linguistiques, scolaires et cognitifs de l’immersion française. La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 63 (5), 629–654. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemaire, E.
(2013) L’intégration du Portfolio européen des langues en milieu ouest-canadien minoritaire et universitaire. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69 (4), 487–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Little, D.
(2009) Language learner autonomy and the European Language Portfolio: Two L2 English examples. Language Teaching, 42 (2), 222–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 44 (3), 381–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandin, L.
(2010) Portfolio langagier: Les finissants des programmes d’immersion se révèlent. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13 (1), 104–118.Google Scholar
Mathison, S.
(1988) Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17 , 13–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newby, D.
(2012) Supporting good practice in teacher education through the European portfolio for student teachers of languages. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6 (3), 207–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newby, D., Allan, R., Fenner, A. B., Jones, B., Komorowska, H., & Soghikyan, K.
(2007) The European portfolio for student teachers of languages (EPOSTL). Graz: European Center for Modern Languages.Google Scholar
Newby, D., Fenner, A. B. & Jones, B.
(2011) Using the European portfolio for student teachers of languages. Graz: European Center for Modern Languages.Google Scholar
Nihlén, C.
(2011) What goes into the EPOSTL dossier and why? In D. Newby, A. B. Fenner & B. Jones (eds.), Using the European portfolio for student teachers of languages (pp. 55–63). Graz: European Center for Modern Languages.Google Scholar
North, B.
(2014) Putting the common European framework of reference to good use. Language Teaching, 47 (2), 228–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ontario College of Teachers
(2015) Looking at…Enhanced teacher education. [URL]
Ontario College of Teachers
(2017) Initial Teacher Education. [URL]
Ontario Ministry of Education
(2013) The Ontario Curriculum: French as a second language (Core French, Grades 4–8; Extended French, Grades 4–8; French Immersion, Grades 1–8). [URL]
Orlova, N.
(2011) Challenges of integrating EPOSTL into pre-service teacher training. In D. Newby, A. B. Fenner & B. Jones (eds.), Using the European portfolio for student teachers of languages (pp. 19–28). Graz: European Center for Modern Languages.Google Scholar
Piccardo, E.
(2011) Du CECR au développement professionnel: Pour une démarche stratégique. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14 (2), 20–52.Google Scholar
(2013) Plurilingualism and curriculum design: Towards a synergic vision. TESOL Quarterly, 47 (3), 600–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ragoonaden, K. O.
(2011) La compétence interculturelle et la formation initiale: Le point sur le CECR et l’IDI. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14 (2), 86–105.Google Scholar
Salvatori, M.
(2009) A Canadian perspective on language teacher education: Challenges and opportunities. The Modern Language Journal, 93 (2), 287–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tedick, D. J.
(2013) Embracing proficiency and program standards and rising to the challenge: A response to Burke. Modern Language Journal, 97 (2), 535–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, M.
(2011) The Canadian language portfolio for teachers. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association of Second Language Teachers (CASLT).Google Scholar
Veilleux, I., & Bournot-Trites, M.
(2005) Standards for the language competence of French immersion teachers: Is there a danger of erosion? Canadian Journal of Education, 28 (3), 487–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wernicke, M.
(2017) Navigating native-speaker ideologies as FSL teacher. Canadian Modern Language Review, 73 (2), 208–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar