Introduction published in:
Police Interviews: Communication challenges and solutions
Edited by Luna Filipović
[Benjamins Current Topics 118] 2021
► pp. 1–8

Police interviews

Communication challenges and solutions

| University of East Anglia
Published online: 02 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.118.01fil
References

References

Berk-Seligson, Susan
2002 “The Miranda Warnings and Linguistic Coercion: The Role of Footing in the Interrogation of a Limited-English Speaking Murder Suspect”. In Language in the Legal Process, ed. by Janet Cotterill, 127–143. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Negotiation and Communicative Accommodation in Bilingual Police Interrogations: A critical Interactional Sociolinguistic Perspective”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 207: 29–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filipović, Luna
2007 “Language as a Witness: Insights from Cognitive Linguistics”. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 14 (2): 245–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “The role of Language in Legal Contexts: A Forensic Cross-linguistic Viewpoint”. In Law and Language: Current Legal Issues (15), ed. by Michael Freeman and Fiona Smith, 328–343. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017a “Applied Language Typology: Applying Typological Insights in Practice”. Languages in Contrast 17(2): 255–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017b “Applying Language Typology: Practical Applications of Research on Typological Contrasts between Languages”. In Motion and Space across Languages. Theory and Applications, ed. by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, 399–418. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filipović, Luna, and Alberto Hijazo-Gascón
2018 “Interpreting Meaning in Police Interviews: Applied Language Typology in a Forensic Linguistics Context”. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics VIAL 15: 67–103.Google Scholar
Filipović, Luna and Suzanne Abad Vergara
2018 “Juggling Investigation and Interpretation: The Problematic Dual Role of Police Officer-Interpreter”. Law and Language/ Linguagem e Direito 5(1): 62–79.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 91–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heydon, Georgina
2005 The Language of Police Interviews: A Critical Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaszczolt, Kasia
2016  Meaning in Linguistic Interaction: Semantics, Metasemantics , Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Linfoot-Ham, Kerry
2006 “Conversational Maxims in Encounters with Law Enforcement Officers”. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 13(1): 23–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meissner, Christian A., Allison R. Redlich, Stephen W. Michael, Jacqueline R. Evans, Catherine Camilletti, Sujeeta Bhatt, and Susan Brandon
2014 “Accusatorial and Information-gathering Interrogation Methods and their Effects on True and False Confessions: A meta-analytic Review”. Journal of Experimental Criminology 10: 459–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar