Part of
Construction Grammar across Borders
Edited by Tiago Timponi Torrent, Ely Edison da Silva Matos and Natália Sathler Sigiliano
[Benjamins Current Topics 122] 2022
► pp. 95118
References (31)
References
Aarts, B. (2007). Syntactic gradience: The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, M. (2014). Slang in new media. A case study. In J. Coleman (Ed.), Global English slang. Methodologies and perspectives (pp. 175–186). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Börjars, K., Vincent, N., & Walkden, G. (2015). On constructing a theory of grammatical change. Transactions of the Philological Society, 113(3), 363–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brisard, F. (Ed.) (2002). Grounding. The epistemic footing of deixis and reference. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brône, G., & Zima, E. (2014). Towards a dialogic construction grammar. A corpus-based approach to ad hoc routines and resonance activation. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 457–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (2010). Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2013). Corpus of global web-based English: 1.9 billion words from speakers in 20 countries (GloWbE). Available online at [URL]
Deppermann, A. (2011). Konstruktionsgrammatik und Interaktionale Linguistik: Affinitäten, Komplementaritäten und Diskrepanzen. In A. Lasch & A. Ziem (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik III. Aktuelle Fragen und Lösungsansätze (pp. 205–238). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Diessel, H. (2015). Usage-based construction grammar. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitivelinguistics (pp. 295–321). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of Let alone. Language, 64(3), 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gutzmann, D., & Henderson, R. (2019). Expressive updates, much? Language, 95(1), 107–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. 3rd ed. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2013). Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word-formation, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Historical sociolinguistics and construction grammar: From mutual challenges to mutual benefits. In T. Säily, A. Nurmi, M. Palander-Collin, & A. Auer (Eds.), Exploring future paths for historical sociolinguistics (pp. 217–237). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Three open questions in diachronic construction grammar. In E. Coussé, P. Andersson, & J. Olofsson (Eds.), Grammaticalization meets construction grammar (pp. 21–39). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Construction grammar and its application to English. 2nd edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Imo, W. (2015). Interactional construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, 1(1), 69–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, G. (2008). Style-shifting and shifting styles: A socio-cognitive approach to lectal variation. In G. Kristiansen & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive sociolinguistics. Language variation, cultural models, social systems (pp. 45–90). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, G., & Geeraerts, D. (2013). Contexts and usage in cognitive sociolinguistics. Journal of Pragmatics, 52, 1–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. (2010). X much. <[URL]>, date of access: 8.3.2018]
Michaelis, L. A., & Feng, H. (2015). What is this, sarcastic syntax? Constructions and Frames, 7, 148–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. Closs. (2010). Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification. In K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification, and grammaticalization (pp. 27–70). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. Closs, & Trousdale, G. (2010). Gradience, gradualness, and grammaticalization – how do they intersect? In E. Closs Traugott & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Gradience, gradualness, and grammaticalization (pp. 19–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Ziem, A. (2015). Probleme und Desiderata einer Social Construction Grammar. In A. Ziem & A. Lasch (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik IV. Konstruktionenalssoziale Konventionen und kognitiveRoutinen (pp. 1–22). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar