Cover not available
Part of
Visual Metaphors
Edited by Réka Benczes and Veronika Szelid
[Benjamins Current Topics 124] 2022
► pp. 1–12

From verbality to visuality

An introduction

| Eötvös Loránd University
| Corvinus University of Budapest
Published online: 9 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.124.01sze
References
Forceville, Ch.
(2017) Visual and multimodal metaphor in advertising: Cultural perspectives. Styles of Communication, 9(2), 26–41.Google Scholar
Hoppál, M., & Szepes, E.
(Eds.) (1987) A szerelem kertjében: Erotikus jelképek a művészetben [In the garden of love: Erotic symbols in art]. Budapest: Szépirodalmi Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2015) Where metaphors come from. Reconsidering context in metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Metaphor universals in literature. In Patrick Colm Hogan’s Literary Universals Project [URL: [URL] – Last accessed: 30 October 2018]. DOI logo
Kövecses, Z., Szelid, V., Nucz, E., Blanco-Carrión, O., Akkök, E. A., & Szabó, R.
(2015) Anger metaphors across cultures. In R. R. Heredia & A. B. Cieslicka (Eds.), Bilingual figurative language processing (pp. 341–367). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martínez, Oncins J. L.
(2006) Notes on the metaphorical basis of sexual language in Early Modern English. In J. G. V. González, M. M. Vázquez & P. R. Vaz (Eds.), The historical linguistics – cognitive linguistics interface (pp. 205–224). Universidad de Huelva.Google Scholar
Musolff, A.
(2016) Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Nyíri, K.
(2019) Postscript: The victory of the pictorial turn. In K. Nyíri & A. Benedek (Eds.), Vision fulfilled: The victory of the pictorial turn (pp. 251–267). Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences & Budapest University of Technology and Economics. [URL: [URL] – Last accessed: 23 January 2019].
Pérez-Sobrino, P.
(2017) Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F., & Díez, O.
(2002) Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szelid, V.
(2007) Szerelem és erkölcs a moldvai déli csángó nyelvhasználatban [Love and morality in Moldavian Southern Csángó language use]. ELTE BTK: Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
(2012) Set me as a seal upon thine heart: A Cognitive Linguistic analysis of the Song of Songs. In S. Kleinke, Z. Kövecses, A. Musolff & V. Szelid (Eds.), Cognition and Culture (pp. 180–191). Budapest: ELTE Eötvös Kiadó.Google Scholar
Szelid, V., & Kövecses, Z.
(2018) Metaforauniverzálék a költészetben [Metaphor universals in poetry]. Magyar Nyelvőr, 142(4), 452–478.Google Scholar
Verebélyi, K.
(1987) Szerelmespár a fa alatt [Lovers under the tree]. In M. Hoppál & E. Szepes (Eds.), A szerelem kertjében: Erotikus jelképek a művészetben [In the garden of love: Erotic symbols in art] (pp. 41–57). Budapest: Szépirodalmi Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Voigt, V.
(1987) Másfél évtized a szerelem kertjében [A century and a half in the garden of love]. In M. Hoppál & E. Szepes (Eds.), A szerelem kertjében: Erotikus jelképek a művészetben [In the garden of love: Erotic symbols in art] (pp. 13–40). Budapest: Szépirodalmi Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar