Article published in:
Where do nouns come from?
Edited by John B. Haviland
[Benjamins Current Topics 70] 2015
► pp. 9–41

The noun-verb distinction in two young sign languages

Many sign languages have semantically related noun-verb pairs, such as ‘hairbrush/brush-hair’, which are similar in form due to iconicity. Researchers studying this phenomenon in sign languages have found that the two are distinguished by subtle differences, for example, in type of movement. Here we investigate two young sign languages, Israeli Sign Language (ISL) and Al-Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language (ABSL), to determine whether they have developed a reliable distinction in the formation of noun-verb pairs, despite their youth, and, if so, how. These two young language communities differ from each other in terms of heterogeneity within the community, contact with other languages, and size of population. Using methodology we developed for cross-linguistic comparison, we identify reliable formational distinctions between nouns and related verbs in ISL, but not in ABSL, although early tendencies can be discerned. Our results show that a formal distinction in noun-verb pairs in sign languages is not necessarily present from the beginning, but may develop gradually instead. Taken together with comparative analyses of other linguistic phenomena, the results lend support to the hypothesis that certain social factors such as population size, domains of use, and heterogeneity/homogeneity of the community play a role in the emergence of grammar.
Published online: 17 June 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.70.02tka
References
Al-Fityani, Kinda & Carol Padden
(2010) Sign language geography in the Arab world. In D. Brentari (Ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge survey (pp. 443–450). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bender, Emily M. & Dan Flickinger
(2005) Rapid prototyping of scalable grammars: Towards modularity in extensions to a grammar-independent core. In Proceedings of IJCNLP 2005 Companion Volume, pp. 203–208. Jeju, Korea.
Bernstein, Basil
(1971) Class, codes and control. Vol. 1. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickford, J. Albert
(2005) The signed languages of Eastern Europe. SIL Electronic Survey Reports 2005-026: 45. http://​www​.sil​.org​/silesr​/abstract​.asp​?ref​=2005​-026Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, Penny & Rachel Sutton-Spence
(Eds.) (2001) The hands are the head of the mouth: The mouth as articulator in sign languages. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Broschart, Jürgen
(1997) Why Tongan does it differently? Linguistic Typology, 1, 123–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
(1970) Remarks on nominalization. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar (pp. 184–221). Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
(1993) A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Einya, Lila Namir, & Izchak M. Schlesinger
(1977) A new dictionary of sign language: Employing the Eshkol-Wachmann movement notation system. The Hague: Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
(2000) Parts of speech as language universals and as language-particular categories. In Petra M. Vogel & Bernard Comrie (Eds.), Approaches to the typology of word classes (pp. 65–103). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Vos, Connie
(2012) Kata Kolko: An updated sociolinguistic profile. In Ulrike Zeshan & Connie de Vos (Eds.), Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights (pp. 381–386). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dotter, Franz & Ingeborg Okorn
(2003) Austria’s hidden conflict: Hearing culture versus deaf culture. In Leila Frances Monaghan, Constanze Schmaling, Karen Nakamura, & Graham H. Turner (Eds.), Many ways to be deaf: International variation in deaf communities (pp. 49–66). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen
(2002) Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2003) Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Erbaugh, Mary
(1986) Taking stock: The development of Chinese noun classifiers historically and in young children. In Colette G. Craig (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization (pp. 399–436). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erlenkamp, Sonja
(2000) Syntaktische Kategorien und lexikalische Klassen: Typologische Aspekte der deutschen Gebärdensprache. München: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
(1995) The grammar of Kayardild. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Word classes in the world’s languages. In Geert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann, & Joachim Mugdan (Eds.), Morphologie: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung / Morphology: International handbook on inflection and word-formation (pp. 708–732). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gil, David
(1991) Nouns, verbs, and quantification. EUROTYP Working Papers, Series X, No. 1.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan
(2003) The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Groce, Nora E
(1985) Everyone here spoke sign language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer
(1999) State-of-the-article: Distributed morphology. Glot International, 4 (4), 3–9.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
(2001) Word classes and parts of speech. In Paul B. Baltes & Neil J. Smelser (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (Vol. 24, pp. 16538–16545). Amsterdam: Pergamon. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology, 11 (1), 119–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Laurie Bauer
(2007) Phoneme inventory size and population size. Language, 83 (2), 388–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P
(1991) The Philippine challenge to universal grammar. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität zu Köln (Arbeitspapier 15, Neue Folge).Google Scholar
Hunger, Barbara
(2006) Noun/verb pairs in Austrian sign language (ÖGS). Sign Language & Linguistics, 2 (2), 71–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith T
(1979) Formality and informality in communicative events. American Anthropologist, 81 (4), 773–790. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Assaf & Wendy Sandler
(2009) Phonological category resolution: A study of handshapes in younger and older sign languages. In Alexandre Castro Caldas & Ana Mineiro (Eds.), Cadernos de Saúde (Vol. 2, pp. 13–28) (Special Issue: Línguas Gestuais ). Lisbon: Universidade Católica Portuguesa (UCP).Google Scholar
Jacobsen, William H
(1979) Noun and verb in Nootkan. In Barbara S. Efrat (Ed.), The victoria conference on Northwestern languages, Victoria, British Columbia, November 4-5, 1976 (pp. 83–155). Victoria, BC: British Columbia Provincial Museum ( Heritage Record, 4).Google Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise(
1995) Quantification in straits salish. In Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer, & Barbara H. Partee (Eds.), Quantification in natural languages (Vol. 2, pp. 487–540). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Robert E
(1991) Sign language, culture and community in a traditional Yucatec Maya village. Sign Language Studies, 73, 461–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) Sign language and the concept of deafness in a traditional Yucatec Mayan village. In Carol J. Erting, Robert C. Johnson, Dotpthy L. Smith, & Bruce D. Snider (Eds.), The deaf way: Perspectives from the international conference on deaf culture (pp. 103–109). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor
(1989) Auslan: The sign language of the Australian deaf community. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
(2001) Nouns and verbs in Australian sign language: An open or shut case? Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6 (4), 235–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri
(2007) Australian sign language (Auslan): An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Joos, Martin
(1962) The five clocks. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kakumasu, Jim
(1968) Urubú Sign Language. International Journal of American Linguistics, 34, 275–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1978) Urubú Sign Language. In Donna Jean Umiker-Sebeok & Thomas Albert Sebeok (Eds.), Aboriginal sign languages of the Americas and Australia(Vol. 2, pp. 247–256). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Kimmelman, Vadim
(2009) Parts of speech in Russian sign language: The role of iconicity and economy. Sign Language & Linguistics, 12 (2), 161–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kisch, Shifra
(2004) Deaf discourse: Social construction of deafness in a Bedouin community in the Negev. Unpublished MA thesis, Tel-Aviv University.Google Scholar
(2012) AL-Sayyid: A sociolinguistic sketch. In Ulrike Zeshan & Connie de Vos (Eds.), Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights (pp. 365–372). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi(
1979) The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kusters, Annelies
(2012) Adamorobe: A demographic, sociolinguistic, and sociocultural profile. In Ulrike Zeshan & Connie de Vos (Eds.), Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights (pp. 347–352). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
(1987) Nouns and verbs. Language, 63, 53–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Launey, Michel
(2004) The features of omnipredicativity in Classical Nahuatl. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 57 (1), 49–69.Google Scholar
Le Guen, Olivier
(2012) An exploration in the domain of time: From Yucatec Maya time gestures to Yucatec Maya Sign Language time signs. In Ulrike Zeshan & Connie de Vos (Eds.), Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights (pp. 209–250). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacSweeney, Mairead, Cheryl Capel, Ruth Campbell, & Bencie Woll
(2008) The signing brain: The neurobiology of sign language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12 (11), 432–440. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marsaja, I. Gede
(2008) Desa Kolok: A deaf village and its sign language in Bali, Indonesia. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit
(2010) Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical use of iconic forms. Language, 86 (4), 865–896.Google Scholar
(2012) Word classes and word formation. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, & Bencie Woll (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (pp. 77–111). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit, Carol Padden, Mark Aronoff, & Wendy Sandler
(2013) Competing iconicities in the structure of languages. Cognitive Linguistics, 24 (2), 309–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
to appear). The influence of community on language structure: Evidence from two young sign languages. Linguistic Variation.
Meir, Irit & Wendy Sandler
(2008) A language in space: The story of Israeli sign language. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit, Wendy Sandler, Carol Padden, & Mark Aronoff
(2010) Emerging sign languages. In Marc Marschark and Patricia Elizabeth Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, (Vol. 2, pp. 267–280). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ross E. & Michael A. Karchmer
(2004) Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental Hearing Status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies, 4 (2), 138–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newport, Elissa L. & Richard P. Meier
(1985) The acquisition of American sign language. In Dan Isaac Slobin (Ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 881–938). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nonaka, Angela M
(2012) Sociolinguistic sketch of Ban Khor and Ban Khor sign language. In Ulrike Zeshan & Connie de Vos (Eds.), Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights (pp. 373–376). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nyst, Victoria
(2007) A descriptive analysis of Adamorobe sign language (Ghana). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol, Irit Meir, Mark Aronoff, & Wendy Sandler
(2010) The grammar of space in two new sign languages. In Diane Brentari (Ed.), Sign language: A Cambridge language survey (pp. 570–590). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas E
A sample grammatical sketch of English. http://​www​.uoregon​.edu​/~tpayne​/engram​/Engramsection03​.pdf (retrieved October 25, 2012).
Pettito, Laura Ann & Paula Marentette
(1991) Babbling in the manual mode: Evidence for the ontogeny of language. Science, 251 (5000), 1493–1496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy
(1993) Sign language and modularity. Lingua, 89 (4), 315–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
(2006) Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPress. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Carol Padden, & Mark Aronoff
(2005) The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 102 (7), 2661–2665.
Sandler, Wendy, Mark Aronoff, Irit Meir, & Carol Padden
(2011) The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29, 503–543. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward
(1921) Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
Schein, Jerome D
(1989) At home among strangers. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Schuit, Joke, Anne Baker, & Roland Pfau
(2011) Inuit Sign Language: A contribution to sign language typology. Linguistics in Amsterdam, 4, 1–31.Google Scholar
Schwager, Waldemar & Ulrike Zeshan
(2008) Word classes in sign languages: Criteria and classification. Studies in Language, 32 (3), 509–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Senghas, Ann
(2005) Language emergence: Clues from a new Bedouin sign language. Current Biology, 15 (12), 463–465. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, William
(1960) Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf (Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers, 8). University of Buffalo, Dept. of Anthropology and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Stokoe, William, Dorothy Castorline, & Carl Croneberg
(1965) A dictionary of American Sign Language on linguistic principles. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press.Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted
(1986) The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Colette G. Craig (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization (pp. 181–214). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Supalla, Ted & Elissa Newport(
1978) How many sits in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. In Patricia Siple (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research (pp. 91–132). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taub, Sarah F
(2000) Iconicity in American sign language: Concrete and metaphorical applications. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2, 31–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tkachman, Oksana
(2012) The basic noun-verb distinction in two young sign languages. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Haifa.Google Scholar
Voghel, Amélie
(2005) Phonologically identical noun-verb pairs in Quebec sign language (LSQ): Form and context. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 25, 68–75.Google Scholar
Washabaugh, William
(1979) Hearing and deaf signers on providence Island. Sign Language Studies, 24, 191–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Washabaugh, William(
1986) Five fingers for survival. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Washabaugh, William, James C. Woodward, & Susan DeSantis
(1978) Providence Island sign: A context-dependent language. Anthropological Linguistics, 20 (3), 95–109.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B
(2004) Complex predicates involving events, time and aspect: Is this why sign languages look so similar? In Josep Quer (Ed.), Signs of the time: Selected papers from TISLR 2004 (pp. 217–250). Hamburg: Signum Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, James & Angela Nonaka
(1997) Report to the Ratchasuda Foundation of findings from a pilot study of Ban Khor sign language. Research Department, Ratchasuda College, Mahidol University at Salaya, Nakhonprathom, Thailand.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison & George W. Grace
(2007) The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form. Lingua, 117, 543–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike
(2000) Gebärdensprachen des indischen Subkontinents. München: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, Inge
(2003) Classifying hand configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal (Sign language of the Netherlands). PhD. Thesis, Utrecht University: LOT.
(2012) Classifiers. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, & Bencie Woll (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (pp. 158–186). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar