The emerging grammar of nouns in a first generation sign language
Specification, iconicity, and syntax
A first generation family homesign system, dubbed “Z”, from the Tzotzil-speaking township of Zinacantán, in Chiapas, Mexico, provides insight into how a new sign language can begin to distinguish formally different “part-of-speech” categories. After describing the small signing community, consisting of 3 deaf sibling and their intermediate hearing sister, plus a younger cousin — the entire set of fluent adult signers — plus the hearing child of the oldest deaf signer, and setting out some of the theoretical issues surrounding the nature of “part-of-speech” in sign languages, the chapter considers three sorts of mechanisms the language has developed to help distinguish signs that refer to objects from signs that refer to actions. These include a set of size-shape specifiers that co-occur with presumed nominal signs, an iconic contrast between different sign formational elements that somewhat inconsistently signal a noun/verb distinction, and, perhaps most interestingly, a construction involving a clearly grammaticalized locative or copular element that allows Z signers to make clear that they are referring to (physical) objects rather than actions. The chapter concludes by considering the overall effect of these quite different formal strategies on the evolving language structure.
References (68)
References
Augustine, SaintBishop of Hippo (, 1955). Confessions and enchiridion, newly translated and edited by Albert C. Outler. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Augustine, SaintBishop of Hippo (, 1992). Confessions, Commentary by James J. O’Donnell. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brentari, Diane, Marie Coppola, Laura Mazzoni, & Susan Goldin-Meadow (2012). When does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 30 (1), 1–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, Penelope (1994). The INS and ONS of Tzeltal locative expressions: the semantics of static descriptions of location. Linguistics, 32 (4/5), 743–790. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Herbert H. (1996). Using language. New York & Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coppola, Marie & Elissa L. Newport (2005). Grammatical subjects in home sign: Abstract linguistic structure in adult primary gesture systems without linguistic input.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
, 102 (52), 19249–19253.
Coppola, Marie & Wing Chee So (2005). Abstract and object-anchored deixis: Pointing and spatial layout in adult homesign systems in Nicaragua. In Alejna Brugos, Manuella R. Clark-Cotton, & Suengwan Ha (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 29th Boston university conference on language development
(pp. 144–155). Boston: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coppola, Marie & Wing Chee So (2006). The seeds of spatial grammar: Spatial modulation and coreference in homesigning and hearing adults. In David Bamman, Tatiana Magnitskaia, & Colleen Zaller (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 30th Boston university conference on language development
(pp. 119–130). Boston: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coppola, Marie & Annie Senghas (2010). The emergence of deixis in Nicaraguan signing. In Diane Brentari (Ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey (pp. 543–569). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cormier, Kearsey, Sandra Smith, & Zed Sevcikova (2013). Predicate structures, gesture and simultaneity in the representation of action in British sign language: Evidence from deaf children and adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 18 (3), 370–390. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cuxac, Christian (2000). Iconicity of sign language. In Martin M. Taylor, Françoise Néel, & Don Bouwhuis (Eds.), The structure of multimodal dialogue (pp. 321–334). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cuxac, Christian (2001). Les langues des signes: analyseurs de la faculté de langage. Acquisition Et Interaction En Langue Etrangère, 15, 11–36.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Danziger, Eve (2008). A person a place or a thing? Whorfian consequences of syntactic bootstrapping in Mopan Maya. In Melissa Bowerman & Penelope Brown (Eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability (pp. 29–48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Danziger, Eve & Elizabeth Keating (1996). Between anthropology and cognitive science: a reemerging dialogue.
Symposium presented to the Annual Meetings of the American Anthropological Association
, San Francisco, November, 1966.
de Vos, Connie (2012). Sign-spatiality in Kata Kolok. Doctoral dissertation, Nijmegen, Radboud University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 64, 805–855. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frishberg, Nancy (1975). Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American sign language. Language, 51 (3), 696–719. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fusellier-Souza, Ivani (2001). La création gestuelle des individus sourds isolés. Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère, 15, 61–96.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fusellier-Souza, Ivani (2004). Sémiogenèse des langues des signes, Étude de langues des signes emergentes (LS ÉMG) pratiquées par des sourds brésiliens. Doctoral dissertation, Sciences du langage, Université Paris 8.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fusellier-Souza, Ivani (2006). Emergence and development of sign languages: from a semiogenetic point of view. Sign Language Studies, 7 (1), 30–56. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldin-Meadow, Susan (2003). The resilience of language: what gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldin-Meadow, Susan (2012). Homesign: gesture to language. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, & Bencie Woll (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (pp. 601–625). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Cynthia Butcher, Carolyn Mylander, & Mark Dodge (1994). Nouns and verbs in a self-styled gesture system: What’s in a name? Cognitive Psychology, 27, 259–319. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haviland, John B. (2011). Nouns, verbs, and constituents in an emerging ‘Tzotzil’ sign language. In Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo, Line Mikkelsen, & Eric Potsdam (Eds.), Representing language: Essays in honor of Judith Aissen (pp. 151–171). Santa Cruz, CA: California Digital Library eScholarship Repository, Linguistic Research Center, University of California, Santa Cruz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd (1997). Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Janzen, Terry (2012). Lexicalization and grammaticalization. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, & Bencie Woll (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (pp. 816–841). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kegl, Judith & Gayla Iwata (1989). Lenguaje de Signos Nicaragüense: A pidgin sheds light on the “Creole?” ASL. In Robert Carlson, Scott DeLancey, Spike Gildea, Doris Payne, & Anju Saxena (Eds.),
Proceedings of the fourth meeting of the Pacific linguistics conference
(pp. 266–294). Eugene, Oregon: Department of Linguistics, University of Oregon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kegl, Judith, Annie Senghas, & Maria Coppola (1999). Creation through contact: Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In Michel DeGraff (Ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development (pp. 179–237). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kendon, Adam (1980). A description of a deaf-mute sign language from the Enga Province of Papua New Guinea with some comparative discussion, Part II: The semiotic functioning of Enga signs. Semiotica, 32, 81–117.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kendon, Adam (1988). Sign languages of Aboriginal Australia: Cultural, semiotic and communicative perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kendon, Adam (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuschel, Rolf (1973). The silent inventor: The creation of a sign language by the only deaf-mute on a Polynesian Island. Sign Languages Studies, 2 (3), 1–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ron (1990). Nouns and verbs. Language, 63, 53–94. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Le Guen, Olivier (2012). An exploration in the domain of time: from Yucatec Maya time gestures to Yucatec Maya Sign Language time signs. In Ulrike Zeshan & Connie de Vos (Eds.), Endangered sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights (pp. 209–250). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter & Ishara Press.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacLeod, Catriona (1973). A deaf man’s sign language. Its nature and position relative to spoken languages. Linguistics, 101, 72–88.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mandel, Mark (1977). Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In Lynn A. Friedman (Ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American sign language (pp. 57–107). New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meir, Irit (2010). Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical extension of iconic forms. Language, 86, 865–896.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meir, Irit, Carol A. Padden, Mark Aronoff, & Wendy Sandler (2007). Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics, 43, 531–563. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morford, Jill P. (1996). Insights to language from the study of gesture: a review of research on the gestural communication of nonsigning deaf people. Language and Communication, 16 (2), 165–178. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morford, Jill P. & Judy A. Kegl (2000). Gestural precursors to linguistic constructs: how input shapes the form of language. In David McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 358–387). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morgan, Gary, Rosalind Herman, & Bencie Woll (2002). The development of complex verb constructions in British Sign Language. Journal of Child Language, 29 (3), 655–675. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Müller, Cornelia (2010). Wie Gesten bedeuten. Eine kognitiv-linguistische und sequenzanalytische Perspektive. Sprache und Literatur, 41, 37–68 (Sonderheft: Sprache und Geste
).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Müller, Cornelia (2013a). Gestures as a medium of expression. The linguistic potential of gestures. In Cornelia Müller, Adam Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva Ladewig, & David McNeill (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 202–207). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Müller, Cornelia (2013b). Towards a grammar of gestures. A form based view. In Cornelia Müller, Adam Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva Ladewig, & David McNeill (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 707–703). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Padden, Carol (1988). Interaction of morphology and syntax in American sign language. New York: Garland Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Padden, Carol (2010). In search of grammar. Paper presented to theoretical issues in sign language research, 10, Purdue, IN, October 1, 2010.
Padden, Carol, Irit Meir, Wendy Sandler, & Mark Aronoff (2010). Against all expectations: Encoding subjects and objects in a new language. In Donna B. Gerdts, John C. Moore, & Maria Polinsky (Eds.), Hypothesis A / hypothesis B: Linguistic explorations in honor of David M. Perlmutter (pp. 383–400). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peirce, Charles Sanders (1894/1992). What is a sign? In Nathan Houser & Christian Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 2, pp. 4–10). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perniss, Pamela & Ulrike Zeshan (2008). Possessive and existential constructions in Kata Kolok (Bali). In Ulrike Zeshan & Pamela Perniss (Eds.), Possessive and existential constructions in sign languages (pp. 125–150). Nijmegen: Ishara Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach (2011). Grammaticalization in sign languages. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 683–695). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quine, Willard Van Orman (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, Harvey, Emmanuel Schegloff, & Gail Jefferson (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Carol Padden, & Mark Aronoff (2005). The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
, 102 (7), 2661–2665
Sapir, Edward (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Supalla, Ted & Elissa L. Newport (1978). How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American sign language. In Patricia A. Siple (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research (pp. 91–132). New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taub, Sarah (2001). Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American sign language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Washabaugh, William (1979). Hearing and deaf signers on Providence Island. Sign Language Studies, 24, 191–214. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Washabaugh, William (1980a). The manu-facturing of a language. Semiotica, 29 (1/2), 1–37. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Washabaugh, William (1980b). The organization and use of Providence Island sign language. Sign Language Studies, 26, 65–92. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Washabaugh, William (1986). Five fingers for survival: Deaf sign language in the Caribbean. Ann Arbor: Karoma Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yau, Shun-Chiu (1992). Création gestuelle et débuts du langage, création de langues gestuelles chez des sourds isolés. Hong Kong: Langages Croisés.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)