Cover not available
Part of
Signs and Structures: Formal Approaches to Sign Language Syntax
Edited by Paweł Rutkowski
[Benjamins Current Topics 71] 2015
► pp. 7–37

Gettin’ together a POSSe

The primacy of predication in ASL possessives

| Montclair State University
This article addresses the derivational relationship between attributive (nominal) and predicative (verbal) possessives marked by the poss sign in American Sign Language. Though traditionally classified as a possessive pronoun, a collection of morphological, syntactic, and semantic patterns is presented here as evidence that poss instead displays the distributional characteristics of a verbal predicate in the language. Classifying POSS as a verbal predicate of possession explains its presence in predicative possessives and allows its attributive use to be derived from this underlying verbal structure as an instance of a prenominal reduced relative clause modifier. These base structures and their interaction with other components of the predicative and attributive domains explain the documented properties of attributive and predicative POSS possessives, including, crucially, the sometimes divergent behaviors of these two possessive constructions.
Published online: 17 September 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.71.02abn
References (30)
Abels, Klaus & Ad Neeleman. 2012. Linear asymmetries and the LCA. Syntax 15(1). 25–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abner, Natasha. 2011. WH-words that go bump in the right. In Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer & Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds.), West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 28, 24–32. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
. 2012. There once was a verb: The predicative core of possessive and nominalization structures in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Baker-Shenk, Charlotte & Dennis Cokely. 1981. American Sign Language: A teacher’s resource text on grammar and culture. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Chris. 1995. Possessive descriptions. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Benedicto, Elena & Diane Brentari. 2004. Where did all the arguments go?: Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22. 743–810. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bernath, Jeffrey L. 2009. Pinning down articles in American Sign Language. Manuscript, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Bošković, Željko. 2010. On NPs and clauses. Manuscript, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen Pichler, Deborah & Julie Hochgesang. 2008. An overview of possessives and existentials in American Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan & Pamela Perniss (eds.), Possessive and existential constructions in sign languages, 213–233. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. Relators and linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan. 1973. Two processes of reduplication in the American Sign Language. Foundations of Language 9(4). 469–480.Google Scholar
. 1975. Influences on word-order change in American Sign Language. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Word order and word order change, 1–25. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
. 1990. The head parameter in ASL. In William Edmondson & Fred Karlsson (eds.), SLR ‘87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, 75–85. Hamburg: Signum.
Freeze, Ray. 1992. Existentials and other locatives. Language 68. 553–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honour of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lentz, Ella M., Cheri Smith & Ken Mikos. 1988. Signing naturally. San Diego, CA: Dawn Sign Press.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Richard Meier. 2011. On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3–4). 95–141.Google Scholar
MacLaughlin, Dawn. 1997. The structure of determiner phrases: Evidence from American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University, Boston, MA.
Mathur, Gaurav. 2000. Verb agreement as alignment in signed languages. PhD dissertation, MIT. [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics].
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan & Robert G. Lee. 2000. The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol. 1988. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara & Vladimir Borschev. 2001. Some puzzles of predicate possessives. In Robert Harnish & István Kenesei (eds.), Perspectives on semantics, pragmatics and discourse. A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer, 91–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partee, Barbara. 2006. A note on Mandarin possessives, demonstratives, and definiteness. In Betty J. Birner & Gregory Ward (eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, 263–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first-phase syntax. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rathmann, Christian. 2005. Event structure in American Sign Language. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Supalla, Ted & Elissa Newport. 1978. How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. In Patricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 91–132. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Henrietta Shu-Fen. 2005. Plurality and modification in Mandarin nominal phrases. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.