Cover not available
Part of
Signs and Structures: Formal Approaches to Sign Language Syntax
Edited by Paweł Rutkowski
[Benjamins Current Topics 71] 2015
► pp. 7–37

Gettin’ together a POSSe

The primacy of predication in ASL possessives

| Montclair State University

This article addresses the derivational relationship between attributive (nominal) and predicative (verbal) possessives marked by the poss sign in American Sign Language. Though traditionally classified as a possessive pronoun, a collection of morphological, syntactic, and semantic patterns is presented here as evidence that poss instead displays the distributional characteristics of a verbal predicate in the language. Classifying POSS as a verbal predicate of possession explains its presence in predicative possessives and allows its attributive use to be derived from this underlying verbal structure as an instance of a prenominal reduced relative clause modifier. These base structures and their interaction with other components of the predicative and attributive domains explain the documented properties of attributive and predicative POSS possessives, including, crucially, the sometimes divergent behaviors of these two possessive constructions.

Published online: 17 September 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.71.02abn
References
Abels, Klaus & Ad Neeleman
2012 Linear asymmetries and the LCA. Syntax 15(1). 25–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abner, Natasha
2011 WH-words that go bump in the right. In Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer & Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds.), West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 28, 24–32. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
2012 There once was a verb: The predicative core of possessive and nominalization structures in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Baker-Shenk, Charlotte & Dennis Cokely
1981 American Sign Language: A teacher’s resource text on grammar and culture. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Chris
1995 Possessive descriptions. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Benedicto, Elena & Diane Brentari
2004 Where did all the arguments go?: Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22. 743–810. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Émile
1966 Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bernath, Jeffrey L
2009 Pinning down articles in American Sign Language. Manuscript, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Bošković, Željko
2010 On NPs and clauses. Manuscript, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Borer, Hagit
2005 Structuring sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen Pichler, Deborah & Julie Hochgesang
2008 An overview of possessives and existentials in American Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan & Pamela Perniss (eds.), Possessive and existential constructions in sign languages, 213–233. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
2006 Relators and linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan
1973 Two processes of reduplication in the American Sign Language. Foundations of Language 9(4). 469–480.Google Scholar
1975 Influences on word-order change in American Sign Language. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Word order and word order change, 1–25. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1990 The head parameter in ASL. In William Edmondson & Fred Karlsson (eds.), SLR ‘87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, 75–85. Hamburg: Signum.
Freeze, Ray
1992 Existentials and other locatives. Language 68. 553–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honour of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994 The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lentz, Ella M., Cheri Smith & Ken Mikos
1988 Signing naturally. San Diego, CA: Dawn Sign Press.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Richard Meier
2011 On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3–4). 95–141.Google Scholar
MacLaughlin, Dawn
1997 The structure of determiner phrases: Evidence from American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University, Boston, MA.
Mathur, Gaurav
2000 Verb agreement as alignment in signed languages. PhD dissertation, MIT. [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics].
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan & Robert G. Lee
2000 The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol
1988 Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara & Vladimir Borschev
2001 Some puzzles of predicate possessives. In Robert Harnish & István Kenesei (eds.), Perspectives on semantics, pragmatics and discourse. A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer, 91–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partee, Barbara
2006 A note on Mandarin possessives, demonstratives, and definiteness. In Betty J. Birner & Gregory Ward (eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, 263–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2008 Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first-phase syntax. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rathmann, Christian
2005 Event structure in American Sign Language. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Supalla, Ted & Elissa Newport
1978 How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. In Patricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 91–132. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Henrietta Shu-Fen
2005 Plurality and modification in Mandarin nominal phrases. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.