Article published in:
Signs and Structures: Formal Approaches to Sign Language Syntax
Edited by Paweł Rutkowski
[Benjamins Current Topics 71] 2015
► pp. 3970
References
Aboh, Enoch O. & Roland Pfau
2010What’s a wh-word got to do with it? In Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds.), Mapping the left periphery: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 5, 91–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abner, Natasha
2010Wh-words that go bump in the right. In Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 24–32. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Barbiers, Sjef, Olaf Koeneman, Marika Lekakou, & Margreet van der Ham
2008Microvariation in syntactic doubling. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bertone, Carmela & Anna Cardinaletti
2011Il sistema pronominale della lingua dei segni italiana. In Cardinaletti, Cecchetto & Donati (eds.), Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS, 141–156.Google Scholar
Branchini, Chiara
2007On relativization and clefting in Italian Sign Language (LIS). PhD dissertation, Università di Urbino, Italy.
Branchini Chiara & Caterina Donati
2009Relatively different: Italian Sign Language relative clauses in a typological perspective. In Anikó Lipták (ed.), Correlatives cross-linguistically, 157–191. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Branchini, Chiara & Carlo Geraci
2011L’ordine dei costituenti in LIS: risultati preliminari. In Cardinaletti, Cecchetto & Donati (eds.), Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS, 109–122.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke
1999The typology of structural deficiency. A case-study of the three classes of pronouns. In Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe. EALT/EUROTYP 20–5, 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna, Carlo Cecchetto & Caterina Donati
(eds.) 2011Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS. FrancoAngeli: Milano, Italy.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo
2012Sentence types. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook (HSK — Handbooks of linguistics and communication science), 292–315. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo, Carlo Geraci & Sandro Zucchi
2006Strategies of relativization in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25. 945–975. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Another way to mark syntactic dependencies: The case for right-peripheral specifiers in sign languages. Language 85(2). 278–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Checchetto, Alessandra, Carlo Cecchetto, Carlo Geraci, Maria Teresa Guasti & Sandro Zucchi
2011Una varietà molto speciale: la LISt (Lingua dei Segni Italiana tattile). In Cardinaletti, Cecchetto & Donati (eds.), Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS, 201–211.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria-Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald
1979Pragmatics, implicature, presupposition, and logical form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Geraci, Carlo
2006aLIS (lingua dei segni italiana) tra ricerca e divulgazione. PhD Dissertation, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca.
2006bNegation in LIS (Italian Sign Language). In Leah Bateman & Cherlon Ussery (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 35, 217–229. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Geraci, Carlo, Katia Battaglia, Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati, Serena Giudice & Emiliano Mereghetti
2011The LIS corpus project: A discussion of sociolinguistic variation in the lexicon. Sign Language Studies 11(4). 528–574. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geraci, Carlo & Robert Bayley
2011Chi, cosa, dove, perché, quando: la distribuzione dei segni wh- in LIS. In Cardinaletti, Cecchetto & Donati (eds.), Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS, 125–141.Google Scholar
Geraci, Carlo, Robert Bayley, Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto & Caterina Donati
2015Variation in Italian Sign Language (LIS): The Case of Wh-signs. Linguistics 53(1). 125–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geraci, Carlo & Carlo Cecchetto
2013Neglected cases of rightward movement. When wh-phrases and negative quantifiers go to the right. In Heike Walker, Gert Webelhuth & Manfred Sailer (eds.), Rightward movement in a comparative perspective, 211–241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Mary A. & Ilza Ribeiro
2009Cleft sentences from Old Portuguese to Modern Portuguese. In Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds.), Focus and background in Romance languages, 123–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Law, Paul
2005Questions and clefts in Malagasy. In Jeffrey Heinz & Dimitrios Ntelitheos (eds.), Proceedings of AFLA XII, UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 12, 195–209.
Munaro, Nicola
1999Sintagmi interrogativi nei dialetti italiani. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Neidle Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan & Robert Lee
2000The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Neidle, Carol
2002Language across modalities: ASL focus and question constructions. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2(1). 71–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, Jairo
2004Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nunes, Jairo & Ronice M. de Quadros
2006Duplication of WH-elements in Brazilian Sign Language. In Leah Bateman & Cherlon Ussery (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 35, 463–477. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Paul, Ileana
2001Concealed pseudo-clefts. Lingua 111. 707–727. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petronio, Karen & Diane Lillo-Martin
1997WH-Movement and the position of Spec-CP: Evidence from American Sign Language. Language 73(1). 18–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Jean-Yves Pollock
2004On wh-clitics and wh-doubling in French and some North-Eastern Italian dialects. Probus 16. 241–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Norvin
2010Uttering trees. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
2001On the position ‘‘Int(errogative)’ in the left periphery of the clause. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax. Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2010On some properties of criterial freezing. In Phoevos Panagiotidis (ed.), The complementiser phase: Subjects and operators, 17–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy
1989Phonological representation of the sign. Dordrecht: Foris CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
2006Sign language and linguistics universals. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Sandt, Rob A.
1988Context and presupposition. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike
(ed.) 2006Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Zucchi, Sandro
2009Along the time line: Tense and time adverbs in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language Semantics 17. 99–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zucchi, Sandro, Carol Neidle, Carlo Geraci, Quinn Duffy & Carlo Cecchetto
2010Functional markers in sign languages. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages (Cambridge Language Surveys), 437–492. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar