Article published in:
Interdisciplinarity in Translation and Interpreting Process Research
Edited by Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow, Susanne Göpferich and Sharon O'Brien
[Benjamins Current Topics 72] 2015
► pp. 517
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Abdel Latif, Muhammad M. M.
2020.  In Translator and Interpreter Education Research [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ],  pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo
Deckert, Mikołaj
2017. Translation and Cognition: Cases of Asymmetry. An Editorial. Research in Language 15:2  pp. 119 ff. Crossref logo
Federici, Federico M. & Callum Walker
2018.  In Eye Tracking and Multidisciplinary Studies on Translation [Benjamins Translation Library, 143],  pp. 11 ff. Crossref logo
Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke
2017.  In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition,  pp. 19 ff. Crossref logo
Pan, Feng
2016. Psycholinguistic and Cognitive Inquiries into Translation and Interpreting. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 62:3  pp. 516 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Agrifoglio, Marjorie
2004 “Sight Translation and Interpreting: A Comparative Analysis of Constraints and Failures.” Interpreting – International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 6 (1): 43–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alves, Fabio
(ed) 2003Triangulating Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alves, Fabio, Adriana Pagano, Stella Neumann, Erich Steiner, and Silvia Hansen-Schirra
2010 “Translation Units and Grammatical Shifts: Towards an Integration of Product- and Process-Based Translation Research.” In Translation and Cognition, ed. by Gregory Shreve, and Erik Angelone, 109–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alves, Fabio, Adriana Pagano, and Igor da Silva
2010 “A New Window on Translators Cognitive Activity: Methodological Issues in the Combined Use of Eye Tracking, Key Logging and Retrospective Protocols.” In Methodology, Technology and Innovation in Translation Process Research [Copenhagen Studies in Language, 38], ed. by Inger Mees, Fabio Alves, and Susanne Göpferich, 267–292. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Alves, Fabio, and Daniel Vale
2011 “On Drafting and Revision in Translation: A Corpus Linguistics Oriented Analysis of Translation Process Data.” TC3: Translation: Computation, Corpora, Cognition 1 (1): 105–122.Google Scholar
Angelone, Erik
2010 “Uncertainty Management and Metacognitive Problem Solving.” In Translation and Cognition, ed. by Gregory Shreve, and Erik Angelone, 17–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Angelone, Erik, and Gregory Shreve
2011 “Uncertainty Management, Metacognitive Bundling in Problem Solving, and Translation Quality.” In Cognitive Explorations of Translation, ed. by Sharon O’Brien, 108–130. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Austermühl, Frank
2001Electronic Tools for Translators. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Baddeley, Alan D., and Graham Hitch
1974 “Working Memory.” In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 8, ed. by Gordon H. Bower, 47–89. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bowker, Lynne
2002Computer-Aided Translation Technology: A Practical Introduction. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Callison-Burch, Chris, Cameron Fordyce, Philipp Koehn, Christof Monz, and Josh Schroeder
2008 “Further Meta-Evaluation of Machine Translation.” Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT. Third Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation , 70–106. The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, June 19. Crossref
Chang, Vincent Chieh-Ying
2009Testing Applicability of Eye-Tracking and fMRI to Translation and Interpreting Studies: An Investigation into Directionality. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Imperial College London.Google Scholar
Choi, Bernard, and Anita Pak
2006 “Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity in Health Research, Services, Education and Policy: 1. Definitions, Objectives, and Evidence of Effectiveness.” Clinical and Investigative Medicine 29 (6): 351–364.Google Scholar
Danks, Joseph, and Gregory Shreve
1997Cognitive Processes in Translation and Interpreting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Désilets, Alain, Louise Brunette, Christiane Melançon, and Geneviève Patenaude
2008 “Reliable Innovation - A Tecchie’s Travels in the Land of Translators.” 8th Association of Machine Translation in the Americas Conference , 339–345. Hawaii, 21-25 October.
Doherty, Stephen, Sharon O’Brien, and Michael Carl
2010 “Eye Tracking as an MT Evaluation Technique.” Machine Translation 24 (1): 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert, and Stuart Dreyfus
2005 “Peripheral Vision: Expertise in Real World Contexts.” Organization Studies 26 (5): 779–792. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ehrensberger-Dow, Maureen, and Daniel Perrin
2010 “Progression Analysis. Tracing Journalistic Language Awareness.” 5th International Conference on ELT in China , 485–510. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Ericsson, K. Anders, and Herbert Simon
1993Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gambier, Yves, Daniel Gile, and Christopher Taylor
1994Conference Interpreting: Current Trends in Research, Proceedings of the International Conference on Interpreting – What do We Know and How? Turku, August 25-27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Göpferich, Susanne
2008Translationsprozessforschung. Stand – Methoden – Perspektiven. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
2009 “Towards a Model of Translation Competence and its Acquisition: The Longitudinal Study TransComp.” In Behind the Mind: Methods, Models and Results in Translation Process Research [Copenhagen Studies in Language, 37], ed. by Susanne Göpferich, Arnt Jakobsen, and Inger Mees, 11–37. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
2010 “Data Documentation and Data Accessibility in Translation Process Research.” The Translator 16 (1): 93–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “From Multidisciplinarity to Transdisciplinarity: The Investigation of Competence Development as a Case in Point.” MikaEL Electronic Proceedings of the KäTu Symposium on Translation and Interpreting Studies 5: 1–24.Google Scholar
Göpferich, Susanne, Arnt Lykke Jakobsen
, and Inger Mees (eds) 2008Looking at Eyes. Eye Tracking Studies of Reading and Translation Processing [Copenhagen Studies in Language, 36]. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Hansen, Gyde
(ed) 1999Probing the Process in Translation – Methods and Results [Copenhagen Studies in Language, 24]. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Hubscher-Davidson, Severine
2009 “Personal Diversity and Diverse Personalities in Translation: A Study of Individual Differences.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 17 (3): 175–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jääskeläinen, Riitta
2010 “Are All Professionals Experts? Definitions of Expertise and Reinterpretation of Research Evidence in Process Studies.” In Translation and Cognition, ed. by Gregory Shreve, and Erik Angelone, 213–227. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jääskeläinen, Riitta, and Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit
1991 “Automatised Processes in Professional vs. Non-Professional Translation: A Think-Aloud Protocol Study.” In Empirical Research in Translation and Intercultural Studies, ed. by Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit, 89–109. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke
2003 “Effects of Think Aloud on Translation Speed, Revision and Segmentation.” In Triangulating Translation: Perspectives in Process-Oriented Research, ed. by Fabio Alves, 69–95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 “Investigating Expert Translators’ Processing Knowledge.” In Knowledge Systems and Translation – Text, Translation and Computational Processing 7, ed. by Helle van Dam, Jan Engberg, and Heidrun Gerzymisch-Arbogast, 173–189. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jensen, Kristian T.H.
2009 “Indicators of Text Complexity.” In Behind the Mind: Methods, Models and Results in Translation Process Research [Copenhagen Studies in Language, 37], ed. by Susanne Göpferich, Arnt Jakobsen, and Inger Mees, 61–80. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Just, Marcel A., and Patricia Carpenter
1980 “A Theory of Reading: From Eye Fixation to Comprehension.” Psychological Review 87: 329–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karamanis, Nikiforas, Saturnino Luz, and Gavin Doherty
2011 “Translation Practice in the Workplace: A Contextual Analysis and Implications for Machine Translation.” Machine Translation 25 (1): 35–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krings, Hans P.
1986Was in den Köpfen von Übersetzern vorgeht. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
2001Repairing Texts: Empirical Investigations of Machine Translation Post-Editing Processes. Translated by G.S. Koby. Kent, OH: The Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
Lachaud, Christian M.
2011 “EEG, EYE and Key: Three Simultaneous Streams of Data for Investigating the Cognitive Mechanisms of Translation.” In Cognitive Explorations of Translation, ed. by Sharon O’Brien, 131–153. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lavie, Alon, and Mark A. Przybocki
(eds) 2009 “Automated Metrics for Machine Translation Evaluation.” Special Issue of Machine Translation 23 (2/3): 69–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lörscher, Wolfgang
1988 “Thinking-Aloud as a Method for Collecting Data on Translation Processes.” In Empirical Research in Translation and Intercultural Studies, ed. by Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit, 67–77. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Mees, Inger, Fabio Alves, and Susanne Göpferich
(eds) 2010Methodology, Technology and Innovation in Translation Process Research [Copenhagen Studies in Language, 38]. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Moser-Mercer, Barbara
2010 “The Search for Neuro-Physiological Correlates of Expertise in Interpreting.” In Translation and Cognition, ed. by Gregory Shreve, and Erik Angelone, 263–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz Martín, Ricardo
2010a “The Way they Were: Subject Profiling in Translation Process Research.” In Methodology, Technology and Innovation in Translation Process Research [Copenhagen Studies in Language, 38], ed. by Inger Mees, Fabio Alves, and Susanne Göpferich, 87–108. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
2010b “On Paradigms and Cognitive Translatology.” In Translation and Cognition, ed. by Gregory Shreve, and Erik Angelone, 169–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nissani, Moti
1997 “Ten Cheers for Interdisciplinarity: The Case for Interdisciplinary Knowledge and Research.” The Social Science Journal 34 (2): 201–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Sharon
2006 “Eye Tracking and Translation Memory Matches.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 14 (3): 185–205.Google Scholar
2008 “Processing Fuzzy Matches in Translation Memory Tools: An Eye-Tracking Analysis.” In Looking at Eyes. Eye Tracking Studies of Reading and Translation Processing [Copenhagen Studies in Language, 36], ed. by Susanne Göpferich, Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, and Inger Mees, 79–102. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
2010 “Controlled Language and Readability.” In Translation and Cognition, ed. by Gregory Shreve, and Erik Angelone, 143–168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed) 2011aCognitive Explorations of Translation. IATIS Yearbook 2010. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2011b “Towards Predicting Post-Editing Productivity.” Machine Translation 25 (3): 197–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Sharon, Minako O’Hagan, and Marian Flanagan
2010 “Keeping an Eye on the UI Design of Translation Memory: How do Translators Use the Concordance Feature?” In Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, ed. by Willem-Paul Brinckman, and Mark Neerincx, 187–190. Delft University of Technology. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
PACTE
2003 “Building a Translation Competence Model.” In Triangulating Translation, ed. by Fabio Alves, 43–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papineni, Kishore, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu
2002 “BLEU: A Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation.” In Proceedings of ACL-2002: 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 311–318. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Quah, Chiew Kin
2006Translation and Technology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Risku, Hanna
2010 “A Cognitive Scientific View on Technical Communication and Translation: Do Embodiment and Situatednesss Really Make a Difference?Target 22 (1): 94–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rydning, Antin Fougner, and Christian Michel Lachaud
2010 “The Reformulation Challenge in Translation.” In Translation and Cognition, ed. by Gregory Shreve, and Erik Angelone, 85–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, Iris, Leona Van Vaerenbergh, and Luuk Van Waes
2011Transediting in Students’ Translation Processes. Antwerp: Artesis Working Papers in Translation Studies 2010–3.Google Scholar
Shreve, Gregory, and Erik Angelone
2010Translation and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jacqui, and K. Anders Ericsson
1991Towards a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite, and William Mann
2006 “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking Back and Moving Ahead.” Discourse Studies 8 (3): 423–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Waes, Luuk, and Peter Jan Schellens
2003 “Writing Profiles: The Effect of the Writing Mode on Pausing and Revision Patterns of Experienced Writers.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 829–853. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Carl, and Gerard Lynch
2008 “Computational Stylometry: Who’s in Play?” In Verbal and Nonverbal Features of Human-Human and Human-Machine Interaction [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5042/2008], ed. by Anna Esposito, Nicolaos Bourbakis, Nikolaos Avouris, and Ioannis Hatzilygeroudis, 169–186. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar