Article published in:
Current Issues in Phraseology
Edited by Sebastian Hoffmann, Bettina Fischer-Starcke and Andrea Sand
[Benjamins Current Topics 74] 2015
► pp. 135–164

50-something years of work on collocations

What is or should be next …

This paper explores ways in which research into collocation should be improved. After a discussion of the parameters underlying the notion of collocation, the paper has three main parts. First, I argue that corpus linguistics would benefit from taking more seriously the understudied fact that collocations are not necessarily symmetric, as most association measures imply. Also, I introduce an association measure from the associative learning literature that can identify asymmetric collocations and show that it can also distinguish collocations with high and low association strengths well. Second, I summarize some advantages of this measure and brainstorm about ways in which it can help re-examine previous studies as well as support further applications. Finally, I adopt a broader perspective and discuss a variety of ways in which all association measures – directional or not – in corpus linguistics should be improved in order for us to obtain better and more reliable results.
Keywords: association measure, collocation, directionality, dispersion, DP (delta P)
Published online: 10 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.74.07gri
References
Baayen, R.H
2010 “Demythologizing the word frequency effect: A discriminative learning perspective”. The Mental Lexicon, 5 (3), 436–461. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, S
2004 Structural and Functional Properties of Collocations in English: A Corpus Study of Lexical and Pragmatic Constraints on Lexical Co-occurrence. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Bell, A., Brenier, J.M., Gregory, M., Girand, C. & Jurafsky, D
2009 “Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English”. Journal of Memory and Language, 60 (1), 92–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daudaravičius, V. & Marcinkevičienė, R
2004 “Gravity counts for the boundaries of collocations”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9 (2), 321–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.C
2007 “Language acquisition as rational contingency learning”. Applied Linguistics, 27 (1), 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.C. & Ferreira-Junior, F
2009 “Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy”. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 187–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evert, S
2005 The Statistics of Word Co-occurrences: Word Pairs and Collocations. Ph.D. thesis. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
2009 “Corpora and collocations”. InA. Lüdeling & M. Kytö(Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. 2. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1212–1248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferraresi, A. & Gries, St. Th
2011 “Type and (?) token frequencies in measures of collocational strength: Lexical gravity vs. a few classics”. Paper presented at Corpus Linguistics 2011 , University of Birmingham, UK .
Firth, J.R
1957 “A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955”. InF. Palmer(Ed.), Selected Papers of J. R. Firth 1952–1959. London: Longman, 168–205.Google Scholar
Gries, St. Th
2001 “A corpus-linguistic analysis of -ic and -ical adjectives”. ICAME Journal, 25, 65–108.Google Scholar
2003 “Testing the sub-test: A collocational-overlap analysis of English -ic and -ical adjectives”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8 (1), 31–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008a “Phraseology and linguistic theory: A brief survey”. InS. Granger & F. Meunier(Eds.), Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008b “Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13 (4), 403–437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010a “Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora: Further explorations”. InS. Th. Gries, S. Wulff & M. Davies(Eds.), Corpus Linguistic Applications: Current Studies, New Directions. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 197–212.Google Scholar
2010b: online. “Bigrams in registers, domains, and varieties: A bigram gravity approach to the homogeneity of corpora”. InM. Mahlberg, V. González-Diaz & C. Smith(Eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference (CL 2009), University of Liverpool, UK , 20–23 July 2009.Available at: http://​ucrel​.lancs​.ac​.uk​/publications​/cl2009 (accessedJuly 2012).
2012 “Corpus linguistics, theoretical linguistics, and cognitive/psycholinguistics: Towards more and more fruitful exchanges”. InJ. Mukherjee & M. Huber(Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and Variation in English: Theory and Description. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 41–63.Google Scholar
Gries, St. Th., Hampe, B. & Schönefeld, D
2005 “Converging evidence: Bringing together 
experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions”. Cognitive Linguistics, 16 (4), 635–676. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Handl, S
2008 “Essential collocations for learners of English: The role of collocational direction and weight”. InF. Meunier & S. Granger(Eds.), Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 43–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jelinek, F
1990 “Self-organized language modeling for speech recognition”. InA. Waibel & K.-F. Lee(Eds.), Readings in Speech Recognition. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 450–506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, A
2009 “Simple maths for keywords”. Paper presented at Corpus Linguistics 2009 , University of Liverpool .
Kjellmer, G
1991 “A mint of phrases”. InK. Aijmer & B. Altenberg(Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Jan Svartvik. London: Longman, 111–127.Google Scholar
McGee, I
2009 “Adjective-noun collocations in elicited and corpus data: Similarities, differences, and the whys and wherefores”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5 (1), 79–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michelbacher, L., Evert, S. & Schütze, H
2007 “Asymmetric association measures”. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing , Borovets, Bulgaria .
2011 “Asymmetry in corpus-derived and human word associations”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 7 (2), 245–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mollin, S
2009 “Combining corpus linguistic and psychological data on word co-occurrences: Corpus collocates versus word associations”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5 (2), 175–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nordquist, D
2009 “Investigating elicited data from a usage-based perspective”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5 (1), 105–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pecina, P
2009 “Lexical association measures and collocation extraction”. Language Resources and Evaluation, 44 (1–2), 137–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, T
1998 “Dependent bigram identification”. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98) , July 28–30, 1197.
R Development Core Team
2012: online. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://​www​.R​-project​.org (accessedJuly 2012).Google Scholar
Raymond, W.D. & Brown, E.L
2012 “Are effects of word frequency effects of context of use? An analysis of initial fricative reduction in Spanish”. InSt. Th. Gries & D.S. Divjak(Eds.), Frequency Effects in Language Learning and Processing. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 35–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, D.R
1995 The Psychology of Associative Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smadja, F
1993 “Retrieving collocations from text: Xtract”. Computational Linguistics, 19 (1), 143–177.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M
2001 Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford/Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tversky, A
1977 “Features of similarity”. Psychological Review, 84 (4), 327–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, A.R
2011 “Intonation unit boundaries and the entrenchment of collocations: Evidence from bidirectional and directional association measures”. Unpublished ms, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Wiechmann, D
2008 “On the computation of collostruction strength: Testing measures of association as expressions of lexical bias”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 4 (2), 253–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W., Yoshida, T., Tang, X. & Ho, T.-B
2009 “Improving effectiveness of mutual information for substantival multiword expression extraction”. Expert Systems with Applications, 36 (8), 10919–10930. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Rastelli, Stefano
2021. Intra-language: the study of L2 morpheme productivity as within-item variance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Rastelli, Stefano & Akira Murakami
2022. Apparently identical verbs can be represented differently: comparing L1–L2 inflection with contingency-based measure ΔP. Corpora 17:1 ► pp. 97 ff. Crossref logo
Smith, Chris A.
2018. Diachronic patterns of usage of no doubt in the English Historical Book Collection (EEBO, ECCO and EVANS). ExELL 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.