Part of
Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its DevelopmentEdited by Leonid Kulikov and Nikolaos Lavidas
[Benjamins Current Topics 75] 2015
► pp. 29–49
Edited by Leonid Kulikov and Nikolaos Lavidas
[Benjamins Current Topics 75] 2015
► pp. 29–49
The rise of ‘subordination features’ in the history of Greek and their decline
The ‘Indirect Speech Traits Cycle’
This study is a contribution based on Greek material to a field of inquiry that deals with the diachronic development of formal syntactic devices and their interrelationship with the dichotomy between main and subordinate clauses in Indo-European (Kiparsky 1995, Lühr 2008). First, we focus on some devices signaling indirect speech that emerged in Pre-Classical and Classical Greek, such as the development of a system of complementizers (hóti ‘that.COMP’, hōs ‘that.COMP’) and some characteristic usages of moods (the optative of indirect speech). In Post-Classical Greek, this system of traits that had been employed to code indirect speech collapsed, as evidenced by the disappearance of hōs ‘that.COMP’ and the optative of indirect speech as well as the high frequency of pleonastic hóti ‘that.COMP’. Later in the history of Greek a new subordination system arises. We interpret these developments in the light of contemporary syntactic theory (Emonds 2004, 2012), and try to formulate a hypothesis regarding the cycle-like regularities and recurrent patterns that are followed by (clusters of) traits, that is, the “Indirect Speech Traits Cycle”.
References (31)
Blass, Friedrich & Albert Debrunner. 1961. A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature: A Translation and Revision of the Ninth–Tenth German Edition Incorporating Supplementary Notes of A. Debrunner (translated by Robert W. Funk). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on Transformations. A Festschrift for Morris Halle ed. by Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Christidis, A.F., ed. 2007. A History of Ancient Greek: From the Beginnings to Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Emonds, Joseph. 1970. Root and Structure-Preserving Transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.
. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York: Academic Press.
. 2004. Unspecified Categories as the Key to Root Constructions. Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects ed. by David Adger, Cécile de Cat & George Tsoulas, 75–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 
. 2012. Augmented Structure Preservation and the Tensed S Constraint. Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons ed. by Loebke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye, 23–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Gelderen, Elly. 2011. Language Change as Cyclical: A Window on the Language Faculty. Studies in Modern English 27.1–23.
Gippert, Jost. 2004. Indo-European Word Order in Main and Subordinate Clauses in a Diachronic Perspective. Analecta homini universali dedicata: Arbeiten zur Indogermanistik, Linguistik, Philologie, Politik, Musik und Dichtung. Festschrift für Oswald Panagl zum 65. Geburtstag, Vol. I ed. by Thomas Krisch, Thomas Lindner & Ulrich Müller, 48–68. Stuttgart: Heinz.
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hermann, Eduard. 1894. Gab es im Indogermanischen nebensätze? Jena: University of Jena PhD dissertation.
. 1895. Gab es im Indogermanischen nebensätze? Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 33.481–535.
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1982. The Sanskrit Quotative: A Historical and Comparative Study. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 12.39–85.
Hooper, Joan & Sandra Thompson. 1973. On the Applicability of Root Transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4.465–491.
Horrocks, Geoffrey. 2007. Syntax: From Classical Greek to the Koine. In A.F. Christidis, ed., 618–631.
Jannaris, Anthony N. 1897. An Historical Greek Grammar Chiefly of the Attic Dialect. Hildesheim: Georg Olms. (Reprinted 1968.)
Joseph, Brian. 1983. The Synchrony and Diachrony of the Balkan Infinitive: A Study in Areal, General and Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1995. The Indo-European Origins of Germanic Syntax. Clause Structure and Language Change ed. by Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts, 140–170. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1980. The Reconstruction of Non-Simple Sentences in Proto-Indo-European. Linguistic Reconstruction and Indo-European Syntax: Proceedings of the Colloquium of the ‘Indogermanische Gesellschaft’, University of Pavia, 6–7 September 1979 ed. by Paolo Ramat, 113–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lühr, Rosemarie. 2008. Competitive Indo-European Syntax. Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction ed. by Gisella Ferraresi & Maria Goldbach, 121–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Markopoulos, Theodore. 2009. The Future in Greek: From Ancient to Medieval. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, Gary. 2002. Nonfinite Structures in Theory and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Monro, David B. 1891. A Grammar of Homeric Greek. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Philippaki-Warburton, Irene. 2007. The Syntax of Classical Greek. In A.F. Christidis, ed., 590–598.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. Elements of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Roberts, Ian. 2007. Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwyzer, Eduard. 1988. Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. München: Beck´sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Sevdali, Christina. 2007. Infinitival Clauses in Ancient Greek: Overt and Full Subjects, the Role of Case and Focus. Cambridge: Cambridge University PhD dissertation.
Smyth, Herbert Weir. 1918. Greek Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.