Article published in:
Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development
Edited by Leonid Kulikov and Nikolaos Lavidas
[Benjamins Current Topics 75] 2015
► pp. 29–49

The rise of ‘subordination features’ in the history of Greek and their decline

The ‘Indirect Speech Traits Cycle’

| University of Salzburg
This study is a contribution based on Greek material to a field of inquiry that deals with the diachronic development of formal syntactic devices and their interrelationship with the dichotomy between main and subordinate clauses in Indo-European (Kiparsky 1995, Lühr 2008). First, we focus on some devices signaling indirect speech that emerged in Pre-Classical and Classical Greek, such as the development of a system of complementizers (hóti ‘that.COMP’, hōs ‘that.COMP’) and some characteristic usages of moods (the optative of indirect speech). In Post-Classical Greek, this system of traits that had been employed to code indirect speech collapsed, as evidenced by the disappearance of hōs ‘that.COMP’ and the optative of indirect speech as well as the high frequency of pleonastic hóti ‘that.COMP’. Later in the history of Greek a new subordination system arises. We interpret these developments in the light of contemporary syntactic theory (Emonds 2004, 2012), and try to formulate a hypothesis regarding the cycle-like regularities and recurrent patterns that are followed by (clusters of) traits, that is, the “Indirect Speech Traits Cycle”.
Published online: 16 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.75.03fyk
References
Blass, Friedrich & Albert Debrunner
1961 A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature: A Translation and Revision of the Ninth–Tenth German Edition Incorporating Supplementary Notes of A. Debrunner (translated by Robert W. Funk). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1973 Conditions on Transformations. A Festschrift for Morris Halle ed. by Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Christidis, A.F.
ed. 2007 A History of Ancient Greek: From the Beginnings to Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
① ②
Emonds, Joseph
1970 Root and Structure-Preserving Transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
1976 A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2004 Unspecified Categories as the Key to Root Constructions. Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects ed. by David Adger, Cécile de Cat & George Tsoulas, 75–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Augmented Structure Preservation and the Tensed S Constraint. Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons ed. by Loebke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye, 23–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2011 Language Change as Cyclical: A Window on the Language Faculty. Studies in Modern English 27.1–23.Google Scholar
Gippert, Jost
2004 Indo-European Word Order in Main and Subordinate Clauses in a Diachronic Perspective. Analecta homini universali dedicata: Arbeiten zur Indogermanistik, Linguistik, Philologie, Politik, Musik und Dichtung. Festschrift für Oswald Panagl zum 65. Geburtstag, Vol. I ed. by Thomas Krisch, Thomas Lindner & Ulrich Müller, 48–68. Stuttgart: Heinz.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer
1991 Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hermann, Eduard
1894 Gab es im Indogermanischen nebensätze? Jena: University of Jena PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
1895 Gab es im Indogermanischen nebensätze? Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 33.481–535.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich
1982 The Sanskrit Quotative: A Historical and Comparative Study. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 12.39–85.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan & Sandra Thompson
1973 On the Applicability of Root Transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4.465–491.Google Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey
2007 Syntax: From Classical Greek to the Koine. In A.F. Christidis, ed., A History of Ancient Greek: From the Beginnings to Late Antiquity, 618–631.Google Scholar
Jannaris, Anthony N.
1897 An Historical Greek Grammar Chiefly of the Attic Dialect. Hildesheim: Georg Olms. (Reprinted 1968.)Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian
1983 The Synchrony and Diachrony of the Balkan Infinitive: A Study in Areal, General and Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1995 The Indo-European Origins of Germanic Syntax. Clause Structure and Language Change ed. by Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts, 140–170. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1980 The Reconstruction of Non-Simple Sentences in Proto-Indo-European. Linguistic Reconstruction and Indo-European Syntax: Proceedings of the Colloquium of the ‘Indogermanische Gesellschaft’, University of Pavia, 6–7 September 1979 ed. by Paolo Ramat, 113–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lühr, Rosemarie
2008 Competitive Indo-European Syntax. Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction ed. by Gisella Ferraresi & Maria Goldbach, 121–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markopoulos, Theodore
2009 The Future in Greek: From Ancient to Medieval. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Gary
2002 Nonfinite Structures in Theory and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Monro, David B.
1891 A Grammar of Homeric Greek. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, Irene
2007 The Syntax of Classical Greek. In A.F. Christidis, ed., A History of Ancient Greek: From the Beginnings to Late Antiquity, 590–598.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. Elements of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2007 Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
2003 Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard
1988 Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. München: Beck´sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Sevdali, Christina
2007 Infinitival Clauses in Ancient Greek: Overt and Full Subjects, the Role of Case and Focus. Cambridge: Cambridge University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Smyth, Herbert Weir
1918 Greek Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten
1995 Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar