Although the reconstruction of Proto-Indo-European as verb-final is widely accepted, there continue to be dissenting opinions (e.g. Friedrich 1975). See e.g. Pires & Thomason (2008), who question the fruitfulness of Indo-European syntactic reconstruction. In this article I address two issues: First, the reconstructable subordination strategies, including relative-correlative structures, are perfectly in conformity with verb-final typology — pace Lehmann (1974) and Friedrich (1975) who considered relative clauses with finite verbs and relative pronouns incompatible with SOV. Second, verb-final reconstruction makes it possible to account for prosodic and segmental changes that single out finite verbs, such as the non-accentuation of Vedic finite verbs and i-apocope preferentially targeting finite verbs in Italic, Celtic, and Baltic-Slavic. Both developments find a natural, prosodically motivated explanation if we accept PIE as SOV, but not if we do not accept that reconstruction. These facts show that, pace Pires & Thomason (2008), the reconstruction of PIE as verb-final is a fruitful hypothesis.
III 1975 [1985]Studies in the Syntax of Relative and Comparative Clauses. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation. (Reprinted in “lightly retouched version”, 1985, New York/London: Garland.)
Bauer, Anna
2011Verberststellung im Hethitischen. Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog: Akten der XIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft Salzburg ed. by Thomas Krisch, Thomas Lindner, Michael Crombach & Stefan Niederreiter, 39–48. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
Behaghel, Otto
1929Zur Stellung des Verbs im Germanischen und Indogermanischen. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 56.276–281.
Bergin, Osborn J
1938On the Syntax of the Verb in Old Irish. Ériu 12.197–214.
Berneker, Erich Karl
1900Die Wortfolge in den slavischen Sprachen. Berlin: Behr.
Bhatt, Rajesh
2003Locality in Correlatives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21.485–541.
Caldwell, Robert
1913A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indian Family of Languages. 3rd edition, revised and edited by J.L. Wyatt & T. Ramakrishna Pillai. Reprinted 1974, New Delhi: Oriental Books Reprint Corporation.
Campbell, Lyle & Alice C. Harris
2002Syntactic Reconstruction and Demythologizing “Myths and the Prehistory of Grammars”. Journal of Linguistics 38.599–618.
Cervin, Richard Stuart
1990Word Order in Ancient Greek: VSO, SVO, SOV, or All of the Above? Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois PhD dissertation.
2006The Origins and Development of Germanic V2: Evidence from Alliterative Verse. Berkeley: University of California PhD dissertation.
Downing, Bruce T
1973Correlative Relative Clauses in Universal Grammar. Minnesota Working Papers in Linguistics and Philosophy of Language 2.1–17.
Downing, Bruce T
1978Some Universals of Relative Clause Structure. Universals of Human Language. Vol. 4: Syntax ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, 375–418. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Dressler, Wolfgang U
1969Eine textsyntaktische Regel der indogermanischen Wortstellung. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 83.1–25.
Emeneau, Murray B
1980Language and Linguistic Area: Essays selected by A. S. Dil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Eythórsson, Thórhallur
1995Verbal Syntax in the Early Germanic Languages. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PhD dissertation.
Eythórsson, Thórhallur
1998Zur historisch-vergleichenden Syntax des Verbums in Germanischen. Sprache und Kultur der Indogermanen; Akten der X. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, 22–28. September 1996 ed. by Wolfgang Meid, 395–410. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.
IV 2008Language and Rhythm in Plautus: Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Fortson, Benjamin W
IV 2010Indo-European Language and Culture: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Friedrich, Paul
1975Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Butte, MT: Journal of Indo-European Studies.
Garrett, Andrew
1994Relative Clause Syntax in Lycian and Hittite. Die Sprache 36.29–69.
Greenberg, Joseph H
1966Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. Universals of Language: Report of a Conference Held at Dobbs Ferry, New York, April 13–15, 1961 ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hale, Kenneth
1975Gaps in Grammar and Culture. Linguistics and Anthropology: In Honor of C. F. Voegelin ed. by Marvin Dale Kinkade, Kenneth Locke Hale & Oswald Werner, 295–315. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Harms, Robert T
1964Review of The Structure and Development of the Finnish Language by Lauri Hakulinen (Bloomington, IN: Curzon, 1960). Word 20.105–114.
Harms, Robert T
1990Synchronic Rules and Diachronic “Laws”: The Saussurean Dichotomy Reaffirmed. Research Guide on Language Change ed. by Edgar C. Polomé, 313–323. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
1995Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haudry, Jean
1973Parataxe, hypotaxe et corrélation dans la phrase latine. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 68.147–186.
Hettrich, Heinrich
1988Untersuchungen zur Hypotaxe im Vedischen. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Hock, Hans Henrich
1976Review of An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics by Raimo Anttila (New York: Macmillan, 1972). Language 52.202–220.
Hock, Hans Henrich
1982aAUX-cliticization as a Motivation for Word Order Change. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 12:1.91–101.
Hock, Hans Henrich
1982bClitic Verbs in PIE or Discourse-based Verb Fronting? Sanskrit sá hovāca gā́rgyaḥ and Congeners in Avestan and Homeric Greek. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 12:2.1–38.
Hock, Hans Henrich
1986/1991Principles of Historical Linguistics. 1st and 2nd ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hock, Hans Henrich
1989Conjoined We Stand: Theoretical Implications of Sanskrit Relative Clauses. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 19:1.93–126.
1999Finality, Prosody, and Change. Proceedings of LP ’98 ed. by Osamu Fujimura, Brian D. Joseph & Bohumil Palek, 15–30. Prague: Karolinum Press.
Hock, Hans Henrich
2000Genre, Discourse, and Syntax in Sanskrit. Textual Parameters in Older Languages ed. by Susan C. Herring, Pieter van Reenen & Lene Schøsler, 163–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hock, Hans Henrich
2006The Insular Celtic Absolute: Conjunct Distinction Once Again: A Prosodic Proposal. Proceedings of the Sixteenth UCLA Indo-European Conference. Los Angeles, Nov. 5–6, 2005 ed. by Karlene Jones-Bley, Martin E. Huld, Angela Della Volpe & Miriam Robbins Dexter, 153–172. (= The Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph, 50.) Washington: Institute for the Study of Man.
Hock, Hans Henrich
2007Morphology and i-apocope in Slavic and Baltic. Proceedings of the Eighteenth UCLA Indo-European Conference. Los Angeles, Nov. 3–4, 2006 ed. by Karlene Jones-Bley, Martin E. Huld, Angela Della Volpe & Miriam Robbins Dexter, 65–76. (= The Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph, 53.) Washington: Institute for the Study of Man.
Hock, Hans Henrich
2008Dravidian Syntactic Typology: A Reply to Steever. Annual Review of South Asian Languages and Linguistics ed. by Rajendra Singh, 164–198. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hock, Hans Henrich
2010aReview of Ferraresi & Goldbach, eds. (2008). Kratylos 55.1–12.
Hock, Hans Henrich
2010bPhrasal Prosody and the Indo-European Verb. Paper at the Arbeitstagung “The Indo-European Verb” of the Indogermanische Gesellschaft, UCLA, September 2010.
Hock, Hans Henrich
2014Vedic Verb Accent Revisited. Vedic and Sanskrit Historical Linguistics. Papers from the 13th World Sanskrit Conference ed. by Jared Klein & Elizabeth Tucker, 153–178.Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Hoffner, Harry A
1997The Laws of the Hittites: A Critical Edition. Leiden: Brill.
van den Hout, Theo
2003Studies in the Hittite Phraseological Construction I: Its Syntactic and Semantic Properties. Hittite Studies in Honor of Harry A. Hoffner, Jr. on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday ed. by Gary M. Beckman, Richard Henry Beal & Gregory McMahon, 177–204. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
Kayne, Richard
1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. (= Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, 25.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Keenan, Edward
1985Relative Clauses. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Volume II: Complex Constructions ed. by Timothy Shopen, 141–170, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keydana, Götz
In Press. Indo-European Syntax. Comparative Indo-European Linguistics: An International Handbook of Language Comparison and the Reconstruction of Indo-European ed. by Matthias A. Fritz & Jared S. Klein Berlin de Gruyter
Klein, Jared S
1992On Verbal Accentuation in the Rigveda. (= American Oriental Society Essay, 11.) New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.
Kornfilt, Jaklin
1987Turkish and the Turkic Languages. In Bernard Comrie, ed., 619–644.
Kuhn, Hans
1933Zur Wortstellung und -betonung im Altgermanischen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 57.1–109.
Ladd, D. Robert
1996Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lehmann, Winfred P
1974Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Lehmann, Winfred P
1978Conclusion: Toward an Understanding of the Profound Unity Underlying Languages. Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann, 395–422. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Leumann, Manu, Johann B. Hofmann & Anton Szantyr
1977aLateinische Laut- und Formenlehre. München: Beck.
Leumann, Manu, Johann B. Hofmann & Anton Szantyr
1977bLateinische Syntax und Stilistik. München: Beck
Lightfoot, David W
2002aMyths and the Prehistory of Grammars. Journal of Linguistics 38.113–136.
Lightfoot, David W
2002bMore Myths. Journal of Linguistics 38.619–626.
2006Clause Boundaries in Old Hittite Relative Sentences. Transactions of the Philological Society 104:1.17–83.
Schleicher, August
1856Handbuch der litauischen Sprache, 1: Grammatik. Prag: Calve.
Schwyzer, Eduard
1949Griechische Grammatik 2: Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik, completed and edited by Albert Debrunner. München: Beck.
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1987Japanese. In Bernard Comrie, ed., 855–880.
Sihler, Andrew L
1995New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Speijer, Jakob S
1886Sanskrit Syntax. Leiden: Brill.
Steever, Sanford B
1987The Serial Verb Formation in the Dravidian Languages. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Suzuki, Yasuko
2008Finite Verb Stress and Clitic Verbs in Old English Beowulf. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois PhD dissertation.
Taylor, Ann
1990Clitics and Configurationality in Ancient Greek. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PhD dissertation.
Taylor, Ann
1994The Change from SOV to SVO in Ancient Greek. Language Variation and Change 6.1–37.
Thomason, Sarah G
2006Syntactic Reconstruction. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed., Vol. 10 ed. by Keith Brown, 397–401. Oxford: Elsevier.
Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman
1988Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wackernagel, Jacob
1892Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung. Indogermanische Forschungen 1.333–345.
Watkins, Calvert
1962Indo-European Origins of the Celtic Verb. Dublin: Institute for Advanced Studies.
Watkins, Calvert
1963Preliminaries to a Historical and Comparative Analysis of the Old Irish Verb. Celtica 6.1–49.
Watkins, Calvert
1964Preliminaries to the Reconstruction of Indo-European Sentence Structure. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Linguists ed. by Horace G. Lunt, 1035–1045. The Hague: Mouton.
Watkins, Calvert
1976Towards Proto-Indo-European Syntax: Problems and Pseudo-Problems. Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax ed. by Sanford Steever, Carol A. Walker & Salikoko S. Mufwene, 305–326. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Weiss, Michael
2009Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.
Wichmann, Søren
2008The Study of Semantic Alignment: Retrospect and the State of the Art. The Typology of Semantic Alignment ed. by Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann, 3–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yoshida, Yutaka
2009Sogdian. The Iranian Languages ed. by Gernot Windfuhr, 279–335. London: Routledge.
2022. Linguistic Areas. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 187 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.