Article published in:Argumentation in Political Deliberation
Edited by Marcin Lewiński and Dima Mohammed
[Benjamins Current Topics 76] 2015
► pp. 101–126
Designing disagreement space through communication-information services
A specific issue for argumentation theory is whether information and communication technologies (ICTs) play any role in governing argument — that is, as parties engage in practical activities across space and time via ICTs, does technology matter for the interplay of argumentative content and process in managing disagreement? The case made here is that technologies do matter because they are not merely conduits of communication but have a role in the pragmatics of communication and argumentation. In particular, ICTs should be recognized as communication-information services that are delegated degrees of responsibility for managing disagreements arising from practical activities. These services are organized around practical theories for designing disagreement space. However, recognizing this relationship between argument and technology requires accounting for procedures, techniques, or rules (i.e., such as found in technology) and speech acts that are not argumentative propositions in any strict sense but that are consequential for what becomes argumentation in any setting. An account about designing disagreement space, grounded in Jackson and Jacobs’s theory of Disagreement Management, is put forward to address these issues while more generally contributing to understanding argument in context.
Keywords: argument governance, communication design work, deliberation, disagreement management, disagreement space, information-communication technologies, social media, third-parties
Published online: 10 July 2015
2009 “Transparency work and argumentation design in deliberation about business in society.” Proceedings of the 16th NCA/AFA Summer Conference on Argumentation, Alta UT, 1–12.
Aakhus, Mark, and Alan Aldrich
Aakhus, Mark, and Sally Jackson
Aakhus, Mark, and Marcin Lewiński
Aakhus, Mark, and Alena L. Vasilyeva
Aakhus, Mark, and Paul Ziek
Ågerfalk, Pär, Mark Aakhus, and Mikael Lind
2010 “Researching open innovation through social media.” Open Innovation Forum. Available: http://openinnovationforum.com/?p=851.
Atkinson, John M., and Paul Drew
Black, Donald, and Mary P. Baumgartner
Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan L. Star
Craig, Robert T., and Karen Tracy
Davies, Todd, and Seeta P. Gangadharan
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
van Eemeren, Frans H.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson, and Scott Jacobs
Goldkuhl, Göran, and Kalle J. Lyytinen
1982 “A language action view of information systems.” International Conference on Information Systems.
Goldkuhl, Göran, and Pär J. Ågerfalk
Jackson, Sally, and Scott Jacobs
Jacobs, Scott., and Mark Aakhus
Jacobs, Scott, and Sally Jackson
Lyytinen, Kalle J.
de Moor, Aldo, and Mark Aakhus
Star, Susan L., and Karen Ruhleder
Walton, Douglas. N.
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.