Cover not available
Part of
Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by María Jesús Pinar Sanz
[Benjamins Current Topics 78] 2015
► pp. 79–95

Multimodal metaphors in political entertainment

Metaphor is one of the primary ways we accommodate and assimilate information and experience into our conceptual organization of the world. The present study investigates the internal cognitive mechanisms of multimodal-metaphor construction in the television genre of animated political cartoons. Taking a cognitive-semantic approach, we analyze how zoomorphs are constructed by the audience when they first appear. The study concludes by describing the potential of multimodal-metaphor analysis as a methodological tool.

Keywords: cognitive mechanisms, multimodal metaphor, political cartoons
Published online: 15 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.06pop
References
Attardo, S., & Chabanne, J.C
(1992) Jokes as a text type. Humour, 5, 165–176.Google Scholar
Black, M
(1962) Models and metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bosman, J., & Hagendoorn, L
(1991) Effects of Literal and Metaphorical Persuasive Messages. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 6(4), 271–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bounegru, L., & Forceville, C
(2011) Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, 10(2), 209–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bronowski, J
(1972) Science and human values. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Conners, J
(2005) Visual representations of the 2004 presidential campaign: Political cartoons and popular culture references. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 479–487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craig, G
(2004) The media, politics and public life. Australia: Allen and Unwin Academic.Google Scholar
Crisp, P
(2005) Allegory, blending and possible situations. Metaphor and Symbol, 20(2), 115–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edelman, M
(1971) Politics as symbol action: Mass arousal and quiescence. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Edwards, J
(2001) Running in the shadows in the Campaign 2000: Candidate metaphors in editorial cartoons. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 2140–2151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
El Refaie, E
(2009a) Multiliteracies: how readers interpret political cartoons. Visual Communication, 8(2), 181–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In C. Forceville, & E. UrioAparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 173–196). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M
(2003) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fiore, M
(2004) Animation and political cartoon. Nieman Report, 58(4), 41.Google Scholar
Forceville, C
(1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C., & UriosAparisi, E
(Eds.) (2009) Multimodal metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., & Sun, P
(2011) Beastly: What makes animal metaphors offensive? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30(3), 311–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, K., & Long, J
(2011) Animal metaphors and metaphorizing animals: An integrated literary, cognitive, and evolutionary analysis of making and partaking of stories. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4(1), 52–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hempelmann, C., & Samson, A
(2007) Visual puns and verbal puns: Descriptive analogy orfalse analogy? In D. Popa & S. Attardo (Eds.), New approaches to the linguistics of humour (pp. 180–196). Galati: Academica.Google Scholar
Jones, J
(2010) Entertaining politics. Satiric television and political engagement ( Communication, Media and Politics ), 2nd edition. New York/Toronto/Plymouth: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Keefe, M
(2004) How about animated cartoons? Cuttingedge cartoons have script, storyboard. The Masthead, 56(4).Google Scholar
Kittay, E.F
(1989) Metaphor: Its cognitive force and linguistic structure. Oxford: ClavendonPress.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Lippmann, W
(1922/1965) Public opinion. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mio, J.S
(1997) Metaphor and Politics. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(2), 113–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mio, J.S., & Katz, A
(Eds.) (1996) Metaphor: Implications and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mitchell, A
(2007) Ancient Greek visual puns: a case study in visual humour. In D. Popa & Attardo (Eds.), New Approaches to the Linguistics of Humour (pp. 180–196). Galati: Academica.Google Scholar
Moss, D
(2007) The animated persuader. PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(2), 241–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ọlátéjú, A
(2005) The Yorùbá animal metaphors: Analysis and interpretation. Nordic Journalf African Studies, 14(3), 368–383.Google Scholar
Pierce, J.C., Beatty, K.M., & Hagnar, P.R
(1982) The dynamics of American public opinion. lenview, IL: Scott Foresman.Google Scholar
Pinker, S
(1993) The language instinct. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Pollio, H
(1996) Boundaries in humour and metaphor. In J.S. Scott & A. Katz (Eds.), Metaphor: Implications and applications (pp. 231–253). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Popa, D
(2007) Media and the public sphere. In Y. Pasedeos (Ed.), International dimensions of mass media research (pp. 493–504). Athens: Athens Institute for Education and Research.Google Scholar
(2011a) Political satire dies last: A study on democracy, opinion formation, and political satire. In V. Tsakona & D. Popa (Eds.), Studies in political humour (pp. 137–166). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011b) Political humour and the ritual of rebellion in computermediated communication. Mélanges francophones, 5(6), 344–362.Google Scholar
Punter, D
(2007) Metaphor. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Raskin, V
1988 Sophisticated jokes. In F. Shaun, D. Hughes & V. Raskin (Eds.), WHIMSY VII. W. Lafayette (pp. 125–127). IN-Tempe, AZ: Purdue University International Society of Humor Studies.Google Scholar
Richards, I.A
(1936) The philosophy of rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schilperoord, J., & Maes, A
(2009) Visual metaphoric conceptualization in editorial cartoons. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 213–240). Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sommer, R., & Sommer, B.A
(2011) Zoomorphology: Animal metaphors for human personality. Anthrozoős, 24(3), 237–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stone, D.A
(1988) Policy paradox and political reason. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
Teng, N.Y
(2009) Image alignment in multimodal metaphor. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 197–212). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thompson, S
(1996) Politics without metaphors is like a fish without water. In J.S. Scott & A. Katz (Eds.), Metaphor: Implications and applications (pp. 185–201). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Tsakona, V
(2009) Language and image interaction in cartoons: Towards a multimodal theory of humour. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1171–1188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2023. Do political cartoons and illustrations have their own specialized forms for warnings, threats, and the like? Speech acts in the nonverbal mode. Social Semiotics 33:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Balakrishnan, Vinod & Vishaka Venkat
2023. A Communicative Framework of Humour. In The Language of Humour and Its Transmutation in Indian Political Cartoons, ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.