Article published in:
Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by María Jesús Pinar Sanz
[Benjamins Current Topics 78] 2015
► pp. 131–146

The establishment of interpretative expectations in film

In this paper we show that some notions from the textual organisation of verbal texts appear also to give insights to the organisation of films. In particular, the beginnings of films are suggested to operate as indicators of those films’ ‘method of development’ and so serve to set up expectations for guiding hypotheses and selective attention during film viewing. By means of a small exploratory study, we demonstrate that film beginnings exhibit differing organisational features that correlate with the overall narrative strategies pursued in the films as a whole. These features may then function as useful indicators for viewers concerning just what interpretative challenges they will face later in the film.
Keywords: film, film beginnings, filmic discourse, interpretation, text organisation, thematic structure
Published online: 15 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.09bat
References
Anderson, J.D
(1996) The reality of illusion: An ecological approach to cognitive film theory. Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Asher, N., & Lascarides, A
(2003) Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baldry, A., & Thibault, P
(2006) Multimodal transcription and text analysis. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Bateman, J.A
(2007) Towards a grande paradigmatique of film: Christian Metz reloaded. Semiotica, 167(1/4), 13–64.Google Scholar
Bateman, J.A., & Schmidt, K.H
(2012) Multimodal film analysis: How films mean. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Booth, W
(1961) Rhetoric of fiction. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Bordwell, D
(1985) Narration in the fiction film. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Film futures. SubStance, 31(1), 88–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Branigan, E
(2002) Nearly true: forking plots, forking interpretations. A response to David Bordwell’s ‘Film Futures’. SubStance, 31(1), 105–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, W
(Ed.) (2009) Puzzle films: Complex storytelling in contemporary cinema. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carroll, N
(2008) The philosophy of motion pictures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fries, P.H
(1995) Themes, methods of development, and texts. In R. Hasan & P.H. Fries (Eds.), On subject and theme: A discourse functional perspective (pp. 317–359). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghadessy, M
(Ed.) (1995) Thematic development in English texts. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.J
(1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Grodal, T
(1999) Emotions, cognitions, and narrative patterns in film. In C. Plantinga & G.M. Smith (Eds.), Passionate views: Film, cognition, and emotion (pp. 127–145). Baltimore/London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
(1967) Notes on transitivity and theme in English – Parts 1 and 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 37–81 and 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M
(2004) An introduction to functional grammar. Third edition. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hansen, P.K
(2007) Reconsidering the unreliable narrator. Semiotica, 165(1/4), 227–246.Google Scholar
Hartmann, B
(2009) Aller Anfang: Zur Initialphase des Spielfilms. Marburg: Schüren.Google Scholar
Heath, S
(1975) Film and system: terms of analysis. Part I. Screen, 16(1), 7–77.Google Scholar
Koch, J
(2011) Unreliable and discordant film narration. Journal of Literary Theory, 5(1), 57–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luchins, A.S., & Luchins, E.H
(1962) Primary-recency in communications reflecting attitudes toward segregation. Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 357–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J.R
(1983) Conjunction: the logic of English text. In J.S. Petöfi & E. Sözer (Eds.), Micro and macro connexity of discourse (pp. 1–72). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
(1992) English text: Systems and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Metz, C
(1974) Language and Cinema. The Hague: Mouton. Translated by D.J. Umiker-Sebeok. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monaco, J
(2009) How to read a film: Movies, media and beyond. 30th edition. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Münsterberg, H
(1916) The photoplay: A psychological study. New York: D. Appleton and Company.Google Scholar
Persson, P
(2003) Understanding cinema. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Propp, V
(1968) The morphology of the folktale. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press. Originally published in Russian in 1928.Google Scholar
Smith, T.J., & Henderson, J.M
(2008) Edit blindness: The relationship between attention and global change blindness in dynamic scenes. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(2)(6),1–17.Google Scholar
Smith, T.J., Levin, D.T., & Cutting, J.E
(2012) A window on reality: Perceiving edited moving images. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 107–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, C
(2008) Cohesive harmony in filmic text. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Multimodal semiotics: Functional analysis in contexts of education (pp. 87–104). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2012) Audiovisual texture in scene transition. Semiotica, 192, 123–160.Google Scholar
Tseng, C., & Bateman, J.A
(2012) Multimodal narrative construction in Christopher Nolan’s Memento: A description of method. Journal of Visual Communication, 11(1), 91–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, T
(1991) Conjunctive structure in documentary film and television. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 5(1), 76–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vogler, C
(1998) The writer’s journey: Mythic structure for writers. Studio City, CA: Michael Wiese Productions.Google Scholar
Wildfeuer, J
(2013) Film discourse interpretation: Towards a new paradigm for multimodal film analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wuss, P
(2009) Cinematic narration and its psychological impact: functions of cognition, emotion and play. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Zacks, J. M, Speer, N. K, & Reynolds, J.R
(2009) Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 138, 307–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Ramos Pinto, Sara & Aishah Mubaraki
2020. Multimodal corpus analysis of subtitling. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 32:3 ► pp. 389 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.