Article published in:
Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by María Jesús Pinar Sanz
[Benjamins Current Topics 78] 2015
► pp. 147164
References
Cameron, L
(1999) Operationalising metaphor for applied linguistic research. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 3–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B
(2008) The text and the story: levels of blending in fictional narratives. In T. Oakley & A. Hougaard (Eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction (pp. 51–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emmott, C
(1997) Narrative comprehension: A discourse perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G
(1997) Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier G., & Turner, M
(2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M
(2004) An introduction to functional grammar. Third revised edition. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Herman, D
(2003) Stories as a tool for thinking. In D. Herman (Ed.), Narrative theory and the cognitive sciences (pp. 163–192). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(2004) Toward a transmedial narratology. In M.L. Ryan (Ed.), Narrative across media: The languages of storytelling (pp. 47–75). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
(2009) Cognitive approaches to narrative analysis. In G. Brône & J. Vandaele (Eds.), Cognitive poetics: Goals, gains and gaps (pp. 79–118). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hodge, R., & Kress, G
(1988) Social semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T
(1996) (2nd edition 2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J
(1967) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, K., & Lim Fei, V
(2009) Sequential visual discourse frames. In E. Ventola & A.J. Moya Guijarro (Eds.), The world told and the world shown: Multisemiotic issues (pp. 139–156). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Oakley, T., & Coulson, S
(2008) Connecting the dots: Mental spaces and metaphoric language in discourse. In T. Oakley & A. Hougaard (Eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction (pp. 27–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Porto, D., & Romano, M
(2010) Conceptual integration in natural oral narratives. Actes des journées d’étude Narratology and the new social dimension of narrative (01–02 Février 2010). At http://​narratologie​.ehess​.fr​/index​.php​?681 (last accessed 8th March 2013).Google Scholar
Ryan, M.L
(2005) On the theoretical foundations of transmedial narratology. In J.C. Meister (Ed.), Narratology beyond literary criticism: Mediality, disciplinarity (pp. 1–23). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E
(2009) Text worlds. In G. Brône & J. Vandaele (Eds.), Cognitive poetics: Goals, gains and gaps (pp. 33–37). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Turner, M
(2008) Conceptual integration. In D. Geraeerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 264–293). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Unsworth, L., & Cleirigh, C
(2009) Multimodality and reading: The construction of meaning through image-text interaction. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 151–163). London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar