Article published in:
Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by María Jesús Pinar Sanz
[Benjamins Current Topics 78] 2015
► pp. 167180
References
Abry, C., Vilain, A., & Schwartz, J.L
(2004) Vocalize to localize? A call for better crosstalk between auditory and visual communication systems. Interaction Studies, 5, 313–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bach, D., Schachinger, H., Neuhoff, J., Esposito F., & Di Salle, F
(2008) Rising sound intensity: An intrinsic warning cue activating the amygdala. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 145–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blake, R., Sobel, K.V., & James, T.W
(2004) Neural synergy between kinetic vision and touch. Psychological Science, 15(6), 397–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bouchardon, S., & LópezVarela, A
(2011) Making sense of the digital as embodied experience. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 13(3). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P
(2012) Braintrust: What neuroscience tells us about morality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Critchley, M
(1977) Ecstatic and synaesthetic experiences during musical perception. In M. Critchley & R.A. Henson (Eds.). Music and the brain: Studies in the neurology of music (pp. 217–230). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Davison, A
(2003) The spiral cage. London: Active Images.Google Scholar
Ernst, M., Banks, M., & Bülthoff, H
(2000) Touch can change visual slant perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3(1), 69–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G
(1994) Mental spaces. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Mappings in thought and language. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C
(1975) Santa Cruz lectures on deixis. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E
(2009) Multimodal metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mounton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G
(2005) The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in reason and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455–479. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V
(2006) Intentional attunement: A neurophysiological perspective on social cognition and its disruption in autism. Brain Res. Cog. Brain Res, 1079, 15–24.Google Scholar
(2008) Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis. Social Neuroscience, 3, 317–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
George, N., & Conty, L
(2008.) Facing the gaze of others. Clinical Neurophysiology, 38(3), 197–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glickstein, M., & Doron, K
(2008) Cerebellum: Connections and Functions. The Cerebellum, 7(4), 589–594. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, A., & Cornish, F
(2010) Intersubjectivity: Towards a dialogical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40, 19–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grishakova, M
(2012) On cognitive and semiotic functions of shifters. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 8(2), 227–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guest, S., Catmur, C., Lloyd, D., & Spence, C
(2002) Audiotactile interactions in roughness perception. Experimental Brain Research, 146(2), 161–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iacoboni, M
(2005) Understanding others: imitation, language, empathy. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From cognitive neuroscience to social science (pp. 77–99). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jenson, D., & Iacoboni, M
(2011) Literary biomimesis: Mirror neurons and the ontological priority of representation. California Italian Studies, 2(1) http://​escholarship​.org​/uc​/item​/3sc3j6dj.Google Scholar
Kemmerer, D
(2006) The semantics of space: integrating linguistic typology and cognitive neuroscience. Neuropsychology, 44, 1607–1621. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kurylowicz, J
(1964) The inflectional categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Lopez-Poveda, E., Palmer, A.R., & Meddis, R
(2010) The neurophysiological bases of auditory perception. New York: Springer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López-Varela, A
(2010) Exploring intercultural relations from the intersubjective perspectives offered through creative art in multimodal formats. Lexia, 5–6, 125–147.Google Scholar
(2011) Multimodal metaphor and intersubjective experiences: the importance of eye-contact in Davison’s graphic novel ‘The Spiral Cage’ and in Annie Abrahams Net-Project ‘On Collaboration’. In L. Masucci & G. Di Rosario (Eds.), Lavori del Convegno Palazzo degli Artista Italiani (pp. 307–324). Naples: Oficina di Letterature Electrónica.Google Scholar
Maravita, A., Spence, Ch., Kennett, S., & Driver, J
(2002) Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition, 83, 25–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Magosso, E., Serino, A., Pellegrino, G.D., & Ursino, M
(2010) Crossmodal links between vision and touch in spatial attention: A computational modeling study. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. Crossref http://​www​.hindawi​.com​/journals​/cin​/2010​/304941/Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S
(1906) Prolegomena to an apology for pragmaticism, The Monist, 5(4), 492–546. Reprinted in C. Hartshorne & A. W. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of C. S. Peirce. Volume V(pp. 530–572). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1932) Division of signs. In C. Hartshorne & A.W. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of C. S. Peirce. Volume II. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1991) On the nature of signs. In J. Hoopes (Ed.), Peirce on signs. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z.W
(2000) Situating vision in the world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(5), 107–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rensink, R
(2000) The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J.R
(1995) The construction of social reality. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.A
(1982) Motor control and learning: A behavioural emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
(1991) Motor learning and performance. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
Tresilian, J
(2012) Sensorimotor control and learning: An introduction to the behavioral neuroscience of action. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D
(1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stolorow, R.D., & Atwood, G.E
(1992) Contexts of being: The intersubjective foundations of psychological life. Hillsdale, NJ & London: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
Wade, N.J
(2010) Pioneers in eye movement. i perception, 1, 33–68. http://​i​-perception​.perceptionweb​.com​/fulltext​/i01​/i0389​.pdf. DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wind, J
(1989) Studies in language origins. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J
(2008) The co-evolution of intersubjectivity and bodily mimesis. In J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C. Sinha & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp. 215–244). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar