Cover not available
Part of
Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by María Jesús Pinar Sanz
[Benjamins Current Topics 78] 2015
► pp. 181–194

Multimodality in Conversational Humor

The paper presents the analysis of the humor found in four dyadic conversations. The results of the conversational data match those of previous studies (Pickering et al., 2009): no differences were found in volume or speech-rate between humorous pause units and non-humorous ones. Similarly, pauses were not found to mark humorous turns. However, the result that punch-lines showed lower pitch than non-humorous parts of the text was not replicated: humorous pause units showed no significant differences in pitch from non-humorous ones. Smiling is found to mark humor only in a general sense of “setting the frame” and is not integrated (i.e., co-extensive) with the humor.

Keywords: conversation, humor, laughter, multimodality, prosody, smiling
Published online: 15 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.12att
References
Archakis, A., Giakoumelou, M., Papazachariou, D., & Tsakona, V
(2010) The prosodic framing of humour in conversational narratives: Evidence from Greek data. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 10, 187–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, S
(1994) Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2000) Irony markers and functions: Towards a goal-oriented theory of irony and its processing. RASK, 12, 3–20.Google Scholar
(2001) Humorous texts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Review of Glenn (2003). HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 18(4), 422–429.Google Scholar
Attardo, S., & Pickering. L
(2011) Timing in the performance of jokes. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 24(2), 233–250.Google Scholar
Attardo, S., Pickering, L., & Baker, A
(2011) Prosodic and multimodal markers of humor in conversation. Pragmatics and Cognition, 19(2), 224–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, J.B., & Chovil, N
(2000) Visible acts of meaning. An integrated message model of language use in face-to-face dialogue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 163–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, G., Currie, K.L., & Kenworthy, J
(1980) Questions of intonation. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Brunner, L.J
(1979) Smiles can be back channels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(5), 728–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulthard, M., & Montgomery, M
(Eds.) (1981) Studies in discourse analysis. London: Thomas Litho Press.Google Scholar
Eisterhold, J., Attardo, S., & Boxer, D
(2006) Reactions to irony in discourse: evidence for the least disruption principle. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(8), 1239–1256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P
(1985) Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. Norton, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., Davidson, R.J., & Friesen, W.V
(1990) Duchenne’s smile: Emotional expression and brain physiology II. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 342–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R
(2003) On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenn, P
(2003) Laughter in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, P.H
(1957) Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66(3), 377–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harker, L., & Keltner, D
(2001) Expressions of positive emotion in women’s college yearbook pictures and their relationship to personality and life outcomes across adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 112–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, J
(2001) The pragmatics of humor support. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 14(1), 55–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo Downing, R., & Iglesias Recuero, S
(2009) Humor e ironía: una relación compleja. In L. Ruiz Gurillo & X.A. Padilla García (Eds.), Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres: Una aproximacion pragmática a la ironía (pp. 423–455). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hirst, D., & Di Cristo, A
(1998) Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G
(1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 79–96). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Owren, M.J. & Bachorowski, J.A
(2003) Reconsidering the evolution of non-linguistic communication: the case of laughter. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 183–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, L
(1999) An analysis of prosodic systems in the classroom discourse of native speaker and nonnative speaker teaching assistants. Unpublished dissertation. University of Florida.Google Scholar
Pickering, L., Corduas, M., Eisterhold, J., Seifried, B., Eggleston, A., & Attardo, S
(2009) Prosodic markers of saliency in humorous narratives. Discourse Processes, 46, 517–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rees, C.E., & Monrouxe, L.V
(2010) I should be lucky ha ha ha ha: The construction of power, identity and gender through laughter within medical workplace learning encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 3384–3399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rockwell, P.A
(2006) Sarcasm and other mixed messages: The ambiguous ways people use language. Lewistown, NY/Queeston/Lampeter: Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Gurillo, L
(2009) ¿Cómo se gestiona la ironía en la conversación? RILCE, 23(2), 363–377.Google Scholar
Trager, G.L
(1958) Paralanguage: A first approximation. Studies in Linguistics, 13, 1–12.Google Scholar
Tsakona, V
(2011) Irony beyond criticism: Evidence from Greek parliamentary discourse. Pragmatics and Society, 2(1), 57–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wennerstrom, A
(2001) The music of everyday speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L
(1953) Philosophical investigations. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar