Cover not available
Part of
Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by María Jesús Pinar Sanz
[Benjamins Current Topics 78] 2015
► pp. 195–209

Image schemas and mimetic schemas in cognitive linguistics and gesture studies

Image schemas have been a fundamental construct in cognitive linguistics, providing grounds for psychological, philosophical, as well as linguistic research. Given the focus in cognitive linguistics on embodied experience as a fundamental basis for language structure and meaning, the employment of image schemas in the analysis of gesture with speech is a logical extension. However, given their level of abstraction, to what degree do image schemas provide a useful explanatory tool for researching the concrete, physically embodied details of gestures? This article considers the answer to this question and then turns to a more recent theoretical development that complements the picture by encompassing a different realm of cognitive and linguistic phenomena. This research, on ‘mimetic schemas’, is shown to have great potential for thinking about some known phenomena of gesture in a new way. Schema research on these different levels thus provides a useful means to analyze behavior in another modality involved in spoken language use, namely the visual.

Keywords: gesture, image schema, metaphor, mimetic schema
Published online: 15 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.13cie
References
Andrén, M
(2008) Iconicity, object manipulation, and schematicity in the development of children’s bodily communication. Talk presented at the third conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, Leipzig, Germany, September 2008.
Bressem, J
(2008) Clusters of image schematic patterns in coverbal gestures. Talk presented at the third conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, Leipzig, Germany, September 2008.
Chafe, W
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cienki, A
(1997) Some properties and groupings of image schemas. In M. Verspoor, K.D. Lee & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning (pp. 3–15). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998a) Straight: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 107–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998b) Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In J.P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 189–204). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(1999) Metaphors and cultural models as profiles and bases. In R.W. Gibbs, Jr. & G.J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 189–203). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Image schemas and gesture. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 421–441). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Why study metaphor and gesture? In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 5–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Usage events of spoken language and the symbolic units we (may) abstract from them. In J. Badio & K. Kosecki (Eds.), Cognitive processes in language (pp. 149–158). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Clark, H
(1973) Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T.E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J
([1925] 1958) Experience and nature. New York: Dover Publications. [Original edition: Chicago/London: Open Court].Google Scholar
Donald, M
(1991) Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Emanatian, M
(1997) The spatialization of judgment. In W.A. Liebert, G. Redeker, & L. Waugh (Eds.), Discourse perspective in cognitive linguistics (pp. 131–147). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fricke, E
(([2008] 2012) Grundlagen einer multimodalen Grammatik des Deutschen: Syntaktische Strukturen und Funktionen. Habilitationsschrift, Frankfurt/Oder: Europa-Universität Viadrina. Republished as Grammatik multimodal (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., Jr
(2005) The psychological status of image schemas. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 113–135). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., Jr., & Colston, H
(1995) The psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 347–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grady, J
(2005) Image schemas and perception: Refining a definition. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 35–55). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampe, B
(Ed.) (2005) From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S
(2009) Grammar, gesture, and cognition: The case of negation in English. PhD dissertation. Bordeaux, France: Université Michel de Montaigne.Google Scholar
James, W
(1890) The principles of psychology. New York: Dover. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M
(1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2005) The philosophical significance of image schemas. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 15–33). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kant, I
([1781] 1968) Critique of pure reason. Translated by N.K. Smith. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, A
(1980) Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M.R. Key (Ed.), The relation between verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207–227). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
(2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladewig, S.H
(2006) Die Kurbelgeste: Konventionalisierte Markierung einer kommunikativen Aktivität. Freie Universität Berlin, Unpublished MA thesis.Google Scholar
(2011) Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes, 6. Consulted 30 December 2011. URL: [URL].Google Scholar
Lakoff, G
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, R
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C
(2003) Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S
(2003) Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, P
(2005) The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins, and transformations. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J
(1992) How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99, 587–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) How to build a baby: III. Image schemas and the transition to verbal thought. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 137–163). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D
(1985) So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review, 92(3), 350–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M
([1945] 1962) Phenomenology of perception. Translated by Colin Smith. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Minsky, M
(1975) A framework for representing knowledge. In P.H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211–277). New York: McGrawHill.Google Scholar
Mittelberg, I
(2010) Geometric and image-schematic patterns in gesture space. In V. Evans P. Chilton& (Eds.), Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 351–385). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Müller, C
(1998a) Iconicity and gesture. In S. Santi, Guaïtella, Cavé & Konopczynski (Eds.), Oralité et gestualité: Communication multimodale, interaction (pp. 321–328). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
(1998b) Redebegleitende Gesten. Kulturgeschichte – Theorie – Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Berlin Verlag A. Spitz.Google Scholar
(2008) What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 219–245). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakley, T
(2007) Image schemas. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 214–235). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, N
(1991) The cultural basis of metaphor. In J.W. Fernandez (Ed.), Beyond tropes: The theory of tropes in anthropology (pp. 56–93). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., & Boyes-Braem, P
(1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roth, W.M., & Lawless, D.V
(2002) How does the body get into the mind? Human Studies, 25, 333–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, D.E
(1980) Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce & W.F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 38–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R.P
(1977) Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Streeck, J
(2009) Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teßendorf, S., & Ladewig, S
(2008) The brushing-aside and the cyclic gesture–reconstructingtheir underlying patterns. Talk presented at the third conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, Leipzig, Germany, September 2008.
Tomasello, M
(1992) First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.C
(1988) Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 406–416.Google Scholar
Williams, R.F
(2008) Path schemas in gesturing for thinking and teaching. Talk presented at the third conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, Leipzig, Germany, September 2008.
Zlatev, J
(2005) What’s in a schema? Bodily mimesis and the grounding of language. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 313–342). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007a) Language, embodiment and mimesis. In T. Ziemke, J. Zlatev & R. Frank (Eds.), Body, language and mind, vol. 1: Embodiment (pp. 297–337). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2007b) Intersubjectivity, mimetic schemas and the emergence of language. Intellectica, 2–3(46–47), 123–152.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., Persson, T., & Gärdenfors, P
(2005a) Bodily mimesis as the missing link in human cognitive evolution. LUCS 121. Lund: Lund University Cognitive Studies.Google Scholar
(2005b) Triadic bodily mimesis is the difference. Commentary to Tomasello, et al. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 720–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Beecks, Christian, Marwan Hassani, Bela Brenger, Jennifer Hinnell, Daniel Schüller, Irene Mittelberg & Thomas Seidl
2016. Efficient Query Processing in 3D Motion Capture Gesture Databases. International Journal of Semantic Computing 10:01 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Fabricius, Steffi, Ulrich Riegel, Mirjam Zimmermann & Benedict Totsche
2022. Between Fight and Theatrical Performance: Conceptual Metaphors of Positionality in Communication about Cooperative Religious Education in Germany. Religious Education 117:3 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.