Part of
Gaze in Human-Robot CommunicationEdited by Frank Broz, Hagen Lehmann, Bilge Mutlu and Yukiko Nakano
[Benjamins Current Topics 81] 2015
► pp. 13–32
Edited by Frank Broz, Hagen Lehmann, Bilge Mutlu and Yukiko Nakano
[Benjamins Current Topics 81] 2015
► pp. 13–32
Robots can be perceived as goal-oriented agents
Understanding the goals of others is fundamental for any kind of interpersonal interaction and collaboration. From a neurocognitive perspective, intention understanding has been proposed to depend on an involvement of the observer’s motor system in the prediction of the observed actions (Nyström et al. 2011; Rizzolatti & Sinigaglia 2010; Southgate et al. 2009). An open question is if a similar understanding of the goal mediated by motor resonance can occur not only between humans, but also for humanoid robots. In this study we investigated whether goal-oriented robotic actions can induce motor resonance by measuring the appearance of anticipatory gaze shifts to the goal during action observation. Our results indicate a similar implicit processing of humans’ and robots’ actions and propose to use anticipatory gaze behaviour as a tool for the evaluation of human-robot interactions.
References
Ambrosini, E., Costantini, M., & Sinigaglia, C
(2011a) Grasping with the eyes. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106, 1437–1442. 
Bartneck, C., Kulic, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S
(2009) Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 71–81.
Chaminade, T., & Cheng, G
(2009) Social cognitive neuroscience and humanoid robotics. Journal of physiology, Paris, 103, 286–295.
Chaminade, T., Franklin, D., Oztop, E., & Cheng, G
(2005) Motor interference between humans and humanoid robots: Effect of biological and artifical motion. In
International Conference on Development and Learning
(pp. 96–101).
Chaminade, T., Zecca, M., Blakemore, S–J., Takanishi, A., Frith, C.D., Micera, S., Dario, P., Rizzolatti, G., Gallese, V., & Umiltà, M.A
(2010) Brain response to a humanoid robot in areas implicated in the perception of human emotional gestures. PLoS One, 5, e11577.
Chartrand, T.L., & Bargh, J.A
(1999) The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.
Cross, E.S., Liepelt, R., de Chaf, Parkinson, J., Ramsey, R., Stadler, W., & Prinz, W
(2011) Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 2238–2254.
Dehais, F., Sisbot, E.A., Alami, R., & Causse, M
(2011) Physiological and subjective evaluation of a human-robot object hand-over task. Applied Ergonomics, 42(6), 785–791.
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R.J
(1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.
Elsner, C., D’Ausilio, A., Gredebäck, G., Falck-Ytter, T., & Fadiga, L
(2012) The motor cortex is causally related to predictive eye movements during action observation. Neuropsychologia, 51, 488–492.
Eshuis, R., Coventry, K.R., & Vulchanova, M
(2009) Predictive eye movements are driven by goals, not by the mirror neuron system. Psychological Science, 20, 438–40.
Fabbri-Destro, M., & Rizzolatti, G
(2008) Mirror neurons and mirror systems in monkeys and humans. Physiology (Bethesda), 23, 171–179.
Falck-Ytter, T., Gredebaeck, G., & von Hofsten, C
(2006) Infants predict other people’s action goals. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 878–879.
Flanagan, J.R., & Johansson, R.S
(2003) Action plans used in action observation. Nature, 424, 769–771.
Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G
(1996) Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119(Pt 2), 593–609.
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G
(2004) A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 396–403.
Gazzola, V., Rizzolatti, G., Wicker, B., & Keysers, C
(2007) The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions. Neuroimage, 35, 1674–1684.
Gesierich, B., Bruzzo, A., Ottoboni, G., & Finos, L
(2008) Human gaze behaviour during action execution and observation. Acta psychological, 128, 324–330.
Gredebäck, G., & Kochukhova, O
(2010) Goal anticipation during action observation is influenced by synonymous action capabilities, a puzzling developmental study. Experimental Brain Research, 202, 493–497.
Gredebäck, G., & Melinder, A
(2010) Infants’ understanding of everyday social interactions: A dual process account. Cognition, 114, 197–206.
Gredebäck, G., Stasiewicz, D., Falck-Ytter, T., von Hofsten, C., & Rosander, K
(2009) Action type and goal type modulate goal-directed gaze shifts in 14-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1190–1194.
Helskinki
(1964 2008) World Medical Association, Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. URL: [URL]. Last accessed 24/4/2014.
Itakura, S., Ishida, H., Kanda, T., Shimada, Y., Ishiguro, H., & Lee, K
(2008) How to build an intentional android: Infants’ imitation of a robot’s goal-directed actions. Infancy, 3, 519–532.
Johansson, R.S., Westling, G., Bäckström, A., & Flanagan, J.R
(2001) Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 6917–6932.
Kamide, H., Mae, Y., Kawabe, K., Shigemi, S., & Arai, T
(2012) A psychological scale for general impressions of humanoids. In
IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
(ICRA, pp. 4030–4037).
Kanakogi, Y., & Itakura, S
(2011) Developmental correspondence between action prediction and motor ability in early infancy. Nature Communications, 2, 341.
Kilner, J.M., Paulignan, Y., & Blakemore, S.J
(2003) An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13, 522–525.
Kupferberg, A., Glasauer, S., Huber, M., Rickert, M., Knoll, A., & Brandt, T
(2011) Biological movement increases acceptance of humanoid robots as human partners in motor interaction. AI & Society, 26, 339–345.
Liepelt, R., Prinz, W., & Brass, M
(2010) When do we simulate non-human agents? Dissociating communicative and non-communicative actions. Cognition, 115, 426–434.
Metta, G., Natale, L., Nori, F., Sandini, G., Vernon, D., Fadiga, L., von Hofsten, C., Rosander, K., Lopes, M., Santos-Victor, J., Bernardino, A., & Montesano, L
(2010) The iCub humanoid robot: An open-systems platform for research in cognitive development. Neural Networks, 23, 1125–1134.
Moriguchi, Y., Minato, T., Ishiguro, H., Shinohara, I., & Itakura, S
(2010) Cues that trigger social transmission of disinhibition in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 181–187.
Nyström, P., Ljunghammar, T., Rosander, K., & von Hofsten, C
(2011) Using mu rhythm desynchronization to measure mirror neuron activity in infants. Developmental Science, 14, 327–335.
Oberman, L.M., McCleery, J.P., Ramachandran, V.S., & Pineda, J.A
(2007a) EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots. Neurocomputing, 70, 2194–2203.
Oberman, L.M., Pineda, J.A., & Ramachandran, V.S
(2007b) The human mirror neuron system: A link between action observation and social skills. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 62–66.
Oztop, E., Franklin, D., Chaminade, T., & Cheng, G
(2005) Human-humanoid interaction: Is a humanoid robot perceived as a human? International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 2, 537–559.
Pattacini, U., Nori, F., Natale, L., Metta, G., & Sandini, G
(2010) An experimental evaluation of a novel minimum-jerk cartesian controller for humanoid robots.
IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
(pp. 1668–1674).
Perani, D., Fazio, F., Borghese, N.A., Tettamanti, M., Ferrari, S., Decety, J., & Gilardi, M.C
(2001) Different brain correlates for watching real and virtual hand actions. Neuroimage, 14, 749–758.
Pierno, A.C., Becchio C., Wall, M.B., Smith, A.T, Turella, L., & Castiello, U
(2006) When gaze turns into grasp. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(12), 2130–2137.
Press, C., Bird, G., Flach, R., & Heyes, C
(2005) Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 632–640.
Press, C., Gillmeister, H., & Heyes, C
(2007) Sensorimotor experience enhances automatic imitation of robotic action. Proceedings. Biological sciences, 274, 2509–2514.
Rani, P., Sims, J., Brackin, R., & Sarkar, N
(2002) Online stress detection using psychophysiological signal for implicit human-robot cooperation. Robotica, 20(6), 673–686.
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L
(2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V
(1999) Resonance behaviors and mirror neurons. Archives Italiennes de Biologie, 137, 85–100.
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L
(1996) Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131–141.
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V
(2001) Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661–670.
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C
(2010) The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 264–274.
Rosander, K., & von Hofsten, C
(2011) Predictive gaze shifts elicited during observed and performed actions in 10-month-old infants and adults. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2911–2917.
Sandini, G., Metta, G., & Vernon, D
(2007) The iCub cognitive humanoid robot: An open-system research platform for enactive cognition. In 50 years of artificial intelligence (pp. 358–369). Springer Berlin: Heidelberg.
Sciutti, A., Bisio, A., Nori, F., Metta, G., Fadiga, L., Pozzo, T., & Sandini, G
(2012) Measuring human-robot interaction through motor resonance. International Journal of Social Robotics, 4(3), 223–234.
Sciutti, A., Del Prete, A., Natale, L., Burr, D.C., Sandini, G., & Gori, M
(2013) Perception during interaction is not based on statistical context.
IEEE/ACM Proceedings of the Human Robot Interaction Conference 2013
. p. 225–226.
Senju, A, Southgate, V, White, S, & Frith, U
(2009) Mindblind eyes: An absence of spontaneous theory of mind in Asperger syndrome. Science, 325, 883–885.
Shimada, S
(2010) Deactivation in the sensorimotor area during observation of a human agent performing robotic actions. Brain Cognitive, 72, 394–399.
Southgate, V., Johnson, M.H., Osborne, T., & Csibra, G
(2009) Predictive motor activation during action observation in human infants. Biology Letters, 5, 769–772.
Stadler, W., Ott, D.V., Springer, A., Schubotz, R.I., Schutz-Bosbach, S., & Prinz, W
(2012) Repetitive TMS suggests a role of the human dorsal premotor cortex in action prediction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6.
Stadler, W., Schubotz, R.I., von Cramon, D.Y., Springer, A., Graf, M., & Prinz, W
(2011) Predicting and memorizing observed action: Differential premotor cortex involvement. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 677–687.
Tai, Y.F., Scherfler, C., Brooks, D.J., Sawamoto, N., & Castiello, U
(2004) The human premotor cortex is ‘mirror’ only for biological actions. Current Biology, 14, 117–120.
Urgesi, C., Maieron, M., Avenanti, A., Tidoni, E., Fabbro, F., & Aglioti, S.M
(2010) Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 2511–2521.
van Baaren, R.B., Holland, R.W., Steenaert, B., & van Knippenberg, A
(2003) Mimicry for money: Behavioral consequences of imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 393–398.
Wada, K., Shibata, T., Musha, T., & Kimura, S
(2005) Effects of robot therapy for demented patients evaluated by EEG. In
Proceedings IEEE/RSJ International Conference Intelligent Robots and Systems
(IROS, pp.1552–1557).
Woodward, A.L
(1998) Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition, 69, 1–34.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Bisio, Ambra, Alessandra Sciutti, Francesco Nori, Giorgio Metta, Luciano Fadiga, Giulio Sandini, Thierry Pozzo & Alessio Avenanti
2014. Motor Contagion during Human-Human and Human-Robot Interaction. PLoS ONE 9:8 ► pp. e106172 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.