Article published in:
Gaze in Human-Robot Communication
Edited by Frank Broz, Hagen Lehmann, Bilge Mutlu and Yukiko Nakano
[Benjamins Current Topics 81] 2015
► pp. 71–98

Cooperative gazing behaviors in human multi-robot interaction

When humans are addressing multiple robots with informative speech acts (Clark & Carlson 1982), their cognitive resources are shared between all the participating robot agents. For each moment, the user’s behavior is not only determined by the actions of the robot that they are directly gazing at, but also shaped by the behaviors from all the other robots in the shared environment. We define cooperative behavior as the action performed by the robots that are not capturing the user’s direct attention. In this paper, we are interested in how the human participants adjust and coordinate their own behavioral cues when the robot agents are performing different cooperative gaze behaviors. A novel gaze-contingent platform was designed and implemented. The robots’ behaviors were triggered by the participant’s attentional shifts in real time. Results showed that the human participants were highly sensitive when the robot agents were performing different cooperative gazing behaviors.
Keywords: embodied conversational agent, eye gaze cue, human-robot interaction, multiparty interaction, multi-robot interaction
Published online: 16 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.81.05xu
References
Allopenna, P.D., Magnuson, J.S., & Tanenhaus, M.K
(1998) Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(4), 419–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Argyle, M., & Cook, M
(1976) Gaze and mutual gaze. Oxford, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Balch, T
(2002) Taxonomies of multirobot task and reward. In Robot Teams: From Diversity to Polymorphism (pp. 23–35). Natick, MA: A K Peters/CRC Press.Google Scholar
Bales, R.F
(1950) A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction. American Sociological Review, 15(2), 257–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bard, K.A., & Leavens, D.A
(2008) Socio-emotional factors in the development of joint attention in human and ape infants. In Learning From Animals? Examining the Nature of Human Uniqueness (pp. 89–104). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bennewitz, M., Faber, F., Joho, D., Schreiber, M., & Behnke, S
(2005) Towards a humanoid museum guide robot that interacts with multiple persons. In Humanoid Robots, 2005. 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference (pp. 418–423). IEEE. Crossref
Bratman, M.E
(1992) Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review, 101(2), 327–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cakmak, M., Srinivasa, S.S., Lee, M.K., Kiesler, S., & Forlizzi, J
(2011) Using spatial and temporal contrast for fluent robot-human hand-overs. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 489–496). ACM.
Cao, Y.U., Fukunaga, A.S., & Kahng, A
(1997) Cooperative mobile robotics: Antecedents and directions. Autonomous Robots, 4, 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., Tomasello, M., Butterworth, G., & Moore, C
(1998) Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(4)1–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casper, J., & Murphy, R.R
(2003) Human-robot interactions during the robot-assisted urban search and rescue response at the world trade center. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 33(3), 367–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H., & Carlson, B.T
(1982) Hearers and speech acts. Language, 58, 332–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dautenhahn, K
(2007) Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 679–704. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Demiris, Y
(2007) Prediction of intent in robotics and multi-agent systems. Cognitive Processing, 8(3), 151–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dudek, G., Jenkin, M., & Milios, E
(2002) A taxonomy of multi-robot systems. In T. Balch & L.E. Parker (Eds.), Robot teams (pp. 3–22). Natick, MA: A K Peters.Google Scholar
Duffy, B.R
(2003) Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3), 177–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farinelli, A., Iocchi, L., & Nardi, D
(2004) Multirobot systems: A classification focused on coordination. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 34(5), 2015–2028. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frischen, A., Bayliss, A.P., & Tipper, S.P
(2007) Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 694. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodrich, M.A., & Schultz, A.C
(2007) Human-robot interaction: A survey. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 1(3), 203–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C
(2007) Interactive footing. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, 24, 16.Google Scholar
Gouaillier, D., Hugel, V., Blazevic, P., Kilner, C., Monceaux, J., Lafourcade, P., Marnier, B., Serre, J., & Maisonnier, B
(2009) Mechatronic design of NAO humanoid. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 769–774). IEEE.
Griffin, Z.M., & Bock, K
(2000) What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11(4), 274–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, E.A., & Tang, J.C
(1994) What video can and cannot do for collaboration: A case study. Multimedia Systems, 2(2), 63–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A
(1967) Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26, 22–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, N., Alempijevic, A., & Dissanayake, G
(2011) Nonverbal robot-group interaction using an imitated gaze cue. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 497–504). ACM.
Kitano, H., Tadokoro, S., Noda, I., Matsubara, H., Takahashi, T., Shinjou, A., & Shimada, S
(1999) Robocup rescue: Search and rescue in large-scale disasters as a domain for autonomous agents research. In IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics , (Vol. 6, pp. 739–743). IEEE.
Knapp, M., Hall, J., & Horgan, T
(2013) Nonverbal communication in human interaction. (8th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Imai, M., Ono, T., & Ishiguro, H
(2003) Physical relation and expression: Joint attention for human-robot interaction. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 50(4), 636–643. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Le Meur, O., Ninassi, A., Le Callet, P., & Barba, D
(2010) Overt visual attention for free-viewing and quality assessment tasks: Impact of the regions of interest on a video quality metric. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 25(7), 547–558. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, Y., Fujie, S., & Kobayashi, T
(2001) Modeling of conversational strategy for the robot participating in the group conversation. In Proceedings of European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology , (Vol. 1, pp. 2173–2176).
McLurkin, J., Lynch, A., Rixner, S., Barr, T., Chou, A., Foster, K., & Bilstein, S
(2010) A low-cost multi-robot system for research, teaching, and outreach. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems (pp. 597–609). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Meltzoff, A.N., Kuhl, P.K., Movellan, J., & Sejnowski, T.J
(2009) Foundations for a new science of learning. Science, 325(5938), 284–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A.S., Sleiderink, A.M., & Levelt, W.J
(1998) Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66(2), B25-B33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Modi, P.J., Shen, W.M., Tambe, M., & Yokoo, M
(2005) ADOPT: Asynchronous distributed constraint optimization with quality guarantees. Artificial Intelligence, 161(1), 149–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muhl, C., & Nagai, Y
(2007) Does disturbance discourage people from communicating with a robot? In 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 1137–1142). IEEE.
Mutlu, B
(2009) Designing gaze behavior for humanlike robots. Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University.
Mutlu, B., Kanda, T., Forlizzi, J., Hodgins, J., & Ishiguro, H
(2012) Conversational gaze mechanisms for humanlike robots. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 1(2), 12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mutlu, B., Shiwa, T., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N
(2009) Footing in human-robot conversations: How robots might shape participant roles using gaze cues. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (pp. 61–68). Crossref
Mutlu, B., Yamaoka, F., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N
(2009) Nonverbal leakage in robots: Communication of intentions through seemingly unintentional behavior. In Proceedings of 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 69–76). Crossref
Nakano, Y.I., & Nishida, T
(2005) Awareness of perceived world and conversational engagement by conversational agents. In Proceedings AISB 2005. Symposium Conversational Informatics for Supporting Social Intelligence and Interaction-Situational and Environmental Information Enforcing Involvement (pp. 128–134).
Parker, L.E
(1998) ALLIANCE: An architecture for fault tolerant multirobot cooperation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 14(2), 220–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Distributed intelligence: Overview of the field and its application in multi-robot systems. Journal of Physical Agents, 2(1), 5–14.Google Scholar
Posner, M.I
(1980) Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, M., & André, E
(2005) Where do they look? Gaze behaviors of multiple users interacting with an embodied conversational agent. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Intelligent Virtual Agents (pp. 241–252). Panayiotopoulos T., Gratch J., Aylett R., Ballin D., Olivier P., Rist T. (Eds.). Springer Berlin: Heidelberg. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rich, C., Ponsler, B., Holroyd, A., & Sidner, C.L
(2010) Recognizing engagement in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (pp. 375–382).
Rich, C., & Sidner, C.L
(2009) Robots and avatars as hosts, advisors, companions, and jesters. AI Magazine, 30(1), 29.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, M., Ahler, C., & Nagpal, R
(2012) Kilobot: A low cost scalable robot system for collective behaviors. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 3293–3298). IEEE.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J.R
(1976) A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L.B., Yu, C., & Pereira, A.F
(2010) Not your mother’s view: The dynamics of toddler visual experience. Developmental Science, 14(1), 9–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Staudte, M., & Crocker, M.W
(2009) Visual attention in spoken human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (pp. 77–84). Crossref
Tapus, A., Mataric, M.J., & Scassellati, B
(2007) Socially assistive robotics. [Grand Challenges in Robotics]. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine, 14(1), 35–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H
(2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675–690. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trafton, J.G., Bugajska, M.D., Fransen, B.R., & Ratwani, R.M
(2008) Integrating vision and audition within a cognitive architecture to track conversations. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (pp. 201–208).
Vertegaal, R., Slagter, R., van der Veer, G., & Nijholt, A
(2001) Eye gaze patterns in conversations: There is more to conversational agents than meets the eyes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 301–308). ACM. Crossref
Vertegaal, R., van der Veer, G., & Vons, H
(2000) Effects of gaze on multiparty mediated communication. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface (pp. 95–102). Montreal, Canada: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, Y., Shinozawa, K., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N., & Miyamoto, T
(2006) Responsive robot gaze to interaction partner. In Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems . Crossref
Yu, C., Ballard, D.H., & Aslin, R.N
(2005) The role of embodied intention in early lexical acquisition. Cognitive Science, 29(6), 961–1005. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, C., Schermerhorn, P., & Scheutz, M
(2012) Adaptive eye gaze patterns in interactions with human and artificial agents. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 1(2), 13: 1–13: 25.Google Scholar
Yu, C., Scheutz, M., & Schermerhorn, P
(2010a) Investigating multimodal real-time patterns of joint attention in an HRI word learning task. In Proceedings of the 2010. 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 309–316). IEEE.
Yu, C., & Smith, L.B
(2012) Embodied attention and word learning by toddlers. Cognition, 125(2), 244–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, C., Smith, L.B., Shen, H., Pereira, A.F., & Smith, T
(2009) Active information selection: Visual attention through the hands. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 1(2), 141–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, C., Smith, T., Hidaka, S., Scheutz, M., & Smith, L
(2010b) A data-driven paradigm to understand multimodal communication in human-human and human-robot interaction. Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis IX (pp. 232–244). Cohen P., Adams N., Berthold M. (Eds.). Springer Berlin: Heidelberg. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Q., Yuan, X., Tu, D., & Lu, J
(2012) Multi-initialized states referred work parameter calibration for gaze tracking human-robot interaction. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 9(75). CrossrefGoogle Scholar