This chapter examines language aggression against women in public online deliberation regarding crimes of violence against women. To do so, we draw upon a corpus of 460 unsolicited digital comments sent in response to four public service advertisements against women abuse posted on YouTube. Our analysis reveals that three patriarchal strategies of abuse — namely, minimize the abuse, deny its existence, and blame women — are enacted in the online discourse under scrutiny and shows how, at the micro-level of interaction, these strategies relate to social identity and gender ideology through complex processes of positive in-group description and negative out-group presentation. We also argue that despite the few comments that explicitly support abuse, this situation changes at implicit, indirect levels of discourse.
1995 “Dominance and Entitlement: The Rhetoric Men Use to Discuss their Violence towards Women.” Discourse & Society 6: 387–406.
Androutsopoulos, Jannis
2011 “From Variation to Heteroglossia in the Study of Computer-Mediated Discourse.” In Digital Discourse: Language in the Media, ed. by Crispin Thurlow and Kristine Mroczek, 277–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bengoechea, Mercedes
2006 “Rompo tus miembros uno a uno (Pablo Neruda): De la reificación a la destrucción en los discursos masculinos sobre la mujer.” Cuadernos de Trabajo Social 19: 25–41.
Bengoechea, Mercedes
2010 “El lenguaje y la cultura como mecanismos de producción y legitimación de la violencia de género.” Paper presented at the
International Conference on Gender Violence: Contexts, Discourses and Representations
, Valencia, November 2010.
Benwell, Bethan
(ed.)2006Masculinity and Men’s Lifestyle Magazines. Oxford: Blackwell.
Benwell, Bethan, and Elizabeth Stokoe
2006Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Boonzaier, Floretta
2008 “ ‘If the Man Says so you Must Sit, then you Must Sit’: The Relational Construction of Woman Abuse: Gender, Subjectivity and Violence.” Feminism Psychology 18: 183–206.
Bostock, Jan, Maureen Plumpton, and Rebeka Pratt
2009 “Domestic Violence against Women: Understanding Social Processes and Women’s Experiences.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 19: 95–110.
Bou-Franch, Patricia
2013 “Domestic Violence and Public Participation in the Media: The Case of Citizen Journalism.” Gender and Language 7 (3):275–302.
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2014 “Conflict Management in Massive Polylogues: A Case Study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics.
Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2012 “Social Interaction in YouTube Text-Based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence.” Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 17: 501–521.
Bucholtz, Mary
2003 “Theories of Discourse as Theories of Gender: Discourse Analysis in Language and Gender Studies.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, ed. by Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, 43–68. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Christie, Christine
1998 “Rewriting Rights: A Relevance Theoretical Analysis of Press Constructions of Sexual Harassment and the Responses of Readers.” Language and Literature 7 (3): 214–234.
Coates, Linda, and Allan Wade
2004 “ ‘Telling it Like it Isn’t’: Obscuring Perpetrator Responsibility for Violent Crime.” Discourse & Society 15: 499–526.
Coates, Linda, and Allan Wade
2007 “Language and Violence: Analysis of Four Discursive Operations.” Journal of Family Violence 22: 511–522.
De Fina, Anna
2000 “Orientation in Immigrant Narratives: The Role of Ethnicity in the Identification of Characters.” Discourse Studies 2 (2): 131–157.
De Fina, Anna
2006 “Group Identity, Narrative and Self Representations.” In Discourse and Identity, ed. by Anna De Fina, Deborah Schiffrin, and Michael Bamberg, 351–375. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Fina, Anna, Deborah Schiffrin, and Michael Bamberg
(eds)2006Discourse and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1997 “Talking Violent: A Phenomenological Study of Metaphors Battering Men Use.” Violence against Women 3 (5): 482–498.
Fairclough, Norman
2003Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Fairclough Norman, and Ruth Wodak
1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.
Fernández Díaz, Natalia
2004La Violencia Sexual y su Representación en la Prensa. Barcelona: Anthropos.
García-Bedolla, Lisa
2003 “The Identity Paradox: Latino Language, Politics and Selective Dissociation.” Latino Studies 1: 264–283.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2010 “The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization.” In Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. by Rotimi Taiwo, 540–563. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Patricia Bou-Franch
2013 “Relational Work in Anonymous, Asynchronous Communication: A Study of (Dis)Affiliation on YouTube.” In Linguistic Aspects of Intercultural Pragmatics, ed. by Istvan Kecskes, and Jesus Romero-Trillo, 343–365. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Patricia Bou-Franch, and Nuria Lorenzo-Dus
1999 “Interactional Coherence in CMC.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 4 (4). [URL]
Jackson, Sue
2001 “ ‘Happily never after’: Young Women’s Stories of Abuse in Hetero-Sexual Love Relationships.” Feminism & Psychology 11 (3): 305–321.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
2004 “Introducing Polylogue.” Journal of Pragmatics 36 (1): 1–24.
Kiesler, Sara, Jane Siegel, and Timothy W. McGuire
1984 “Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication.” American Psychologist 39 (10): 1123–1134.
Lee, Eun-Ju
2007 “Deindividuation Effects on Group Polarization in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Role of Group Identification, Public Self-Awareness and Perceived Argument Quality.” Journal of Communication 57: 385–403.
Lledó, Eulàlia
2010 “La Representación de la Violencia de Género en los Medios de Comunicación.” Paper presented at the
International Conference on Gender Violence: Contexts, Discourses and Representations
, Valencia, November 2010.
Lockwood Harris, Kate, Kelly E. Palazzolo, and Matthew W. Savage
2012 “ ‘I’m not Sexist, but.. .’: How Ideological Dilemmas Reinforce Sexism in Talk about Intimate Partner Violence.” Discourse & Society 23 (6): 643–656.
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch
2011 “On-Line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (10): 2578–2593.
2008Language and Sexism. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Morris, Anne
2009 “Gendered Dynamics of Abuse and Violence in Families: Considering the Abusive Household Gender Regime.” Child Abuse Review 18: 414–427.
Muehlenhard, Charlene L., and Leigh A. Kimes
1999 “The Social Construction of Violence: The Case of Sexual and Domestic Violence.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 3 (3): 234–245.
Papacharissi, Zizi
2004 “Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups.” New Media and Society 6 (2): 259–283.
Reicher, Steve, Russell Spears, and Tom Postmes
1995 “A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena.” European Review of Social Psychology 6: 161–198.
Santaemilia, José, and Sergio Maruenda
2013 “Semantic Prosodies and Discourse Constellations in (De)Legitimising Naming Practices in Newspaper Discourse.” In Applied Intercultural Pragmatics, ed. by Istvan Kecskes, and Jesús Romero Trillo, 439–457. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Siegel, Jane, Vitaly Dubrovsky, Sara Kiesler, and Timothy W. McGuire
1986 “Group Processes in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37: 157–187.
Sproull, Lee, and Sara Kiesler
1986 “Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication.” Management Science 32: 1492–1512.
Stokoe, Elizabeth
2010 “ ‘I’m not Gonna Hit a Lady’: Conversation Analysis, Membership Categorization and Men’s Denials of Violence towards Women.” Discourse and Society 21 (1): 59–82.
Talbot, Mary M
1997 “ ‘Randy Fish Boss Branded a Stinker’: Coherence and the Construction of Masculinities in a British Tabloid Newspaper.” In Language and Masculinity, ed. by Sally Johnson and Ulrike H. Meinhof, 173–187. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tannen, Deborah
1999The Argument Culture: Stopping America’s War of Words. New York: Ballantine Books.
Trinch, Shonna
2007 “Deconstructing the ‘Stakes’ in High Stakes Gatekeeping Interviews: Battered Women and Narration.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1895–1918.
Turner, Graeme
2010Ordinary People and the Media: The Demotic Turn. London: Sage.
van Dijk, Teun A
1989 “Structures of Discourse and Structures of Power.” Communication Yearbook 12: 18–59.
van Dijk, Teun A
1995a “Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis.” In Language and Peace, ed. by Christina Schäffner, and Anita Wenden, 17–33. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.
van Dijk, Teun A
1995b “Ideological Discourse Analysis.” New Courant 4: 135–161. Special issue Interdisciplinary Approaches to Discourse Analysis, ed. by Eija Ventola, and Anna Solin.
van Dijk, Teun A
1998 “Opinions and Ideologies in the Press.” In Approaches to Media Discourse, ed. by Allan Bell and Peter Garrett, 21–63. London: Blackwell.
van Dijk, Teun A
2006 “Ideology and Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11 (2): 115–140.
2009 “Violent Images? The Representation of Gender Violence in Contemporary British and American Cinema.”
Plenary Lecture Delivered at the 2009 Gentext Meeting
, University of Valencia.
Cited by
Cited by 7 other publications
Dynel, Marta & Fabio I. M. Poppi
2020. Arcana imperii*. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Ehrlich, Susan
2019. Language and Sexual Violence in the Legal System. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality,
Ehrlich, Susan
2019. Language and Sexual Violence in the Legal System. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.