Cover not available
Part of
Exploring Language Aggression against Women
Edited by Patricia Bou-Franch
[Benjamins Current Topics 86] 2016
► pp. 127–154

Addressing women in the Greek parliament

Institutionalized confrontation or sexist aggression?

In accordance with numerous studies highlighting aspects of political and parliamentary discourse that concern the rhetoric of political combat, verbal attacks and offensive language choices are shown to be rather common in the context of a highly adversarial parliamentary system such as the Greek. In the present study, however, the analysis of excerpts of parliamentary discourse addressed to women reveals not just aspects of the organization of rival political encounters but, as far as female MPs are concerned, aggressive and derogatory forms of speech that directly attack the gender of the addressees. Drawing on data from video-recordings, the official proceedings of parliamentary sittings, and the media (2012–2015), the present study investigates aggressive/sexist discourse within this context. The theoretical issues addressed concern the impoliteness end of the politeness/politic speech/impoliteness continuum in the light of extreme cases of conflict in political/parliamentary discourse.
Keywords: aggression, conflict, im/politeness, politic speech, political/parliamentary discourse, sexism
Published online: 29 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.86.06geo
References (45)
Alvanoudi, Angeliki. 2014. Grammatical Gender in Interaction. Cultural and Cognitive Aspects. Leiden/Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2010. “The Study of Language and Space in Media Discourse.” In Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Volume I, ed. by Peter Auer and Jurgen E. Schmidt, 740–758. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Archakis, Argyris, and Villy Tsakona. 2010. “‘The Wolf Wakes up inside them, Grows Werewolf Hair and Reveals all their Bullying’: The Representation of Parliamentary Discourse in Greek Newspapers.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 912–923. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert B. 2010. “Constituting Face in Conversation: Face, Facework and Interactional Achievement.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2078–2105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Maxwell J., and John Heritage. (eds). 1984. Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Attenborough, Frederick. 2014. “Rape is Rape (except when it’s not). The Media Recontextualisation and Violence against Women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2 (2): 183–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia. 2013. “Domestic Violence and Public Participation in the Media: The Case of Citizen Journalism.” Gender and Language 7 (3): 275–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “An Introduction to Language Aggression against Women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2 (2): 177–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2014. “Gender Ideology and Social Identity Processes in Online Language Aggression against Women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2 (2): 226–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. [1978]1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie, and Norman Fairclough. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Christie, Christine. 2005. “Politeness and the Linguistic Construction of Gender in Parliament: An Analysis of Transgressions and Apology Bebaviour”. Working Papers in the Web 3.[URL]
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research 1: 35–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dersley, Ian, and Antony J. Wootton. 2001. “In the Heat of a Sequence: Interactional Features Preceding Walkouts from Argumentative Talk.” Language in Society 30:611–638.Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Galen, Britt Rachelle, and Marion K. Underwood. 1997. “A Developmental Investigation of Social Aggression among Children.” Developmental Psychology 33: 589–600. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2013. “Introduction: Face, Identity and Im/politeness. Looking Backward, Moving Forward: From Goffman to Practice Theory.” Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Globalization, Transnational Identities and Conflict Talk: The Complexity of the Latino Identity.” Paper presented in the 9th International Im/Politeness Conference “Im/politeness & Globalisation” , Athens 1–3 July, 2015.
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2013. “Small Stories and Social Media: The Role of Narrative Stancetaking in the Circulation of a Greek News Story.” Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies , Paper 100. [URL]
Georgalidou, Marianthi. 2009. “Gender Differences in the Discourse of Greek Children Play-groups: The Negotiation of Control Acts in Single and Mixed- Gender Interactions.” Gender and Language 3 (2): 209–248.Google Scholar
. 2011. ““Stop caressing the ears of the hooded”: Political humor in times of conflict”. In Studies in Political Humor, ed. by Villy Tsakona, and Diana Popa, 83–108. Amsterdam/ Philadlphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgalidou, Marianthi and Sofia Lampropoulou. (in print). “Grammatical Gender and Language Sexism in the Documents of the Greek Public Administration.” Glossologia. [in Greek]
Goodwin-Harness, Marjorie. 2006. The Hidden Life of Girls. Games of Stance, Status and Exclusion. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra. 2000. “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse.” Discourse and Society 12 (4): 451–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian, and Robin Wooffitt. 2008. Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2001. “Unparliamentary Language: Insults as Cognitive Forms of Ideological Confrontation.” In Language and Ideology. Volume II: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches, ed. by René Dirven, Roslyn M. Frank, and Cornelia Ilie, 235–263. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lampropoulou, Sofia, and Marianthi Georgalidou. (in prep.). Language Sexism in Greek Public Discourse: When Male Exclusive Forms Become a Matter of Grammatical Correctness. Palgrave Communications, Gender Studies.
Makri-Tsilipakou, Marianthi. 2014. “Practices of Sociolinguistic Categorization: Membership Categories”. In 11th International Conference on Greek Linguistics. Selected Papers, ed. by George Kotzoglou, et al., 19–45. Rhodes: Laboratory of Linguistics of the SE Mediterranean Studies, University of the Aegean. [in Greek]Google Scholar
Mills, Sara. 2003. “Third Wave Feminist Linguistics and the Analysis of Sexism.” DAOL: Third Wave Feminist Linguistics. [URL]Google Scholar
Mullany, Louise. 2007. Gendered Discourse in Professional Communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nekvapil, Jiří, and Ivan Leudar. 2002. “Sequential Structures in Media Dialogical Networks.” Czech Sociological Review 38: 483–500. [in Czech]Google Scholar
Pavlidou, Theodosia-Soula. 2002. Language- Gender- Sex. Thessaloniki: Paratiritis. [in Greek]Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes”. In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by Maxwell J. Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shantz, Carolyn Uhlinger, and Willard W. Hartup. 1992. Conflict in Child and Adolescent Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Sylvia. 2000. “Language, Gender and Floor Appointment in Debates.” Discourse and Society 11 (3): 401–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Language and Gender in the House of Commons. PhD Thesis, University of London.
. 2009. “The Difference Women Make: A Critique of the Notion of a ‘Women’s Style’ of Language in Political Contexts.” Proceedings of the BAAL Annual Conference . Newcastle: Newcastle University.
Sifianou, Maria. 2008. “Parliamentary Discourse and Politeness.” In For Language. Festschrift for Professor George Babiniotis by the department of linguistics, ed. by Amalia Mozer, Aikaterini Bakakou-Orfanou, Christoforos Charalambakis and Despina Chila-Markopoulou, 464–474. Athens: Ellinika Grammata. [in Greek]Google Scholar
Tsakona, Villy. 2011. “Irony Beyond Criticism. Evidence from Greek Parliamentary Discourse.” Pragmatics and Society 2 (1): 57–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Parliamentary Punning: Is the Opposition More Humorous than the Ruling Party?” European Journal of Humor Research 1 (2):101–111. EJHR: [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsakona, Villy, and Diana Popa. (eds). 2011. Studies in Political Humor. Amsterdam/ Philadlphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 1992a. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1992b. “Linguistic Politeness and Politic Verbal Behavior: Reconsidering Claims for Universality.” In Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, ed. by Richard J. Watts, Ide Sachiko and Konrad Ehlich, 43–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Linguistic Politeness Theory and its Aftermath: Recent Research Trails.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. by Miriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham, 43–70. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Kostopoulos, Christos
2023. Constructing Political Adversaries Through Debasement Language: A Framing Analysis of Kyriakos Mitsotakis’ Greek Speeches in 2020. In Debasing Political Rhetoric, ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Georgalidou, Marianthi, Katerina T. Frantzi & Giorgos Giakoumakis
2020. Aggression in media-sharing websites in the context of Greek political/parliamentary discourse in the years of the economic crisis. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2 ► pp. 321 ff. DOI logo
Frantzi, Katerina T., Marianthi Georgalidou & Giorgos Giakoumakis
2019. Greek Parliamentary Discourse in the Years of the Economic Crisis. In Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.