Cover not available
Part of
Advances in Research on Semantic Roles
Edited by Seppo Kittilä and Fernando Zúñiga
[Benjamins Current Topics 88] 2016
► pp. 27–49

Identifying semantic role clusters and alignment types via microrole coexpression tendencies

| Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History
| Philipps-Universität Marburg

In this chapter, we illustrate a method for identifying clusters of semantic roles by cross-linguistic comparison. On the basis of data from 25 languages drawn from the ValPaL (Valency Patterns Leipzig) database, we show how one can visualize coexpression tendencies using quantitative methods (in particular, multidimensional scaling). Traditionally, the coexpression of semantic microroles (such as the breaker and the broken thing of the ‘break’ verb, the helper and the helpee of the ‘help’ verb, etc.) has been studied for particular languages, with generalized macroroles such as “agent”, “actor”, and “undergoer” being compared across languages in a next step. We set up a conceptual space of 87 microroles based on their coexpression tendencies, i.e. the extent to which they are expressed identically (via flagging and indexing) across our languages. The individual coding means (cases, adpositions, index-sets) can then be mapped onto this conceptual space, revealing broader alignment patterns.

Keywords: alignment type, coexpression, microrole, semantic map, valency
Published online: 29 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.88.02har
References (25)
Bickel, Balthasar
2007 Typology in the 21st century: Major current developments. Linguistic Typology 11. 239–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Eric
2013 Zenzontepec Chatino valency patterns. In Iren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. ([URL])Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981 Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael
2010 Semantic maps as metrics on meaning. Linguistic Discovery 8(1). 70–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Inducing semantic roles. In: Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds.), Perspectives on semantic roles, 23–68. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W
1979 Ergativity. Language 55. 59–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark & Søren Wichmann
(eds.) 2008 The typology of semantic alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
François, Alexandre
2008 Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: Intertwining polysemous networks across languages. In Martine Vanhove (ed.), From polysemy to semantic change, 163–216. (Studies in Language Companion Series 106). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furrer, Reinhard, Douglas Nychka & Stephen Sain
2012 Fields: Tools for spatial data. R package.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1974 Concessives, conditionals, and verbs of volition. Foundations of Language 11(3). 341–359.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Iren, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor
(eds.) 2013 Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. ([URL])Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2003 The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 2, 211–242. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2010 Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Lingustic Typology 15(3). 535–567.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Iren Hartmann
2014 Comparing verbal valency across languages. In Bernard Comrie & Andrej L. Malchukov (eds.), Valency classes: A comparative handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E
1997 Beyond subject and object: Toward a comprehensive relational typology. Linguistic Typology 1(3). 279–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2006 Participant roles, thematic roles and syntactic relations. In Tasaku Tsunoda & Taro Kageyama (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations: In honor of Masayoshi Shibatani, 153–174. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L
2013 Alignment preferences in basic and derived ditransitives. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 263–289. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J
2005 Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick
1998 Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
2008 Why are stative-active languages rare in Eurasia? A typological perspective on split-subject marking. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment, 121–140. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team.
2012 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL].Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr
2005 Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard
2009 Motion events in parallel texts: A study in primary-data typology. Bern: University of Bern Habilitationsschrift.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard & Michael Cysouw
2012 Lexical typology through similarity semantics: Toward a semantic map of motion verbs. Linguistics 50(3). 671–710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by 1 other publications

Messerschmidt, Maria
2022. Increasing the valency of motion verbs: the case of the portative construction. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 75:1 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.