Article published in:
Advances in Research on Semantic Roles
Edited by Seppo Kittilä and Fernando Zúñiga
[Benjamins Current Topics 88] 2016
► pp. 109131
References

References

Blake, Barry
1994Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Nicholas Enfield, James Essegbey, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Sotaro Kita, Friederike Lüpke & Felix Ameka
2007Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language 83(3). 495–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Eric Pederson
(eds.) 2011Event representation in language and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Censabella, Marisa
2010Beneficiaries and recipients in Toba (Guaycurú). In Fernando Zúñiga & Seppo Kittilä (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies, 185–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
2004Circumstance concepts. In G. Booij, et al. (eds.), Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation, Vol. 2, 1117–1130. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Frawley, William
1992Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hole, Daniel
2008Dativ, Bindung und Diathese. Berlin: Humboldt University Habilitation thesis.Google Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo
2005Recipient-prominence vs. beneficiary-prominence. Linguistic Typology 9(2). 269–297.Google Scholar
2010Beneficiary coding in Finnish. In Fernando Zúñiga & Seppo Kittilä (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies, 245–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marten, Lutz & Nancy Kula
2011Benefactive and substitutive applicatives in Bemba. Ms., SOAS and University of Essex.
Palmer, Frank R.
1994Grammatical roles and relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Penny, Ralph
2002A history of the Spanish language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, David
2007Applicative constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Platt, J.
1971Grammatical form and grammatical meaning: A tagmemic view of Fillmore’s deep structure case concepts. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Rapold, Christian
2010Beneficiary and other roles of the dative in Tashelhiyt. In Fernando Zúñiga & Seppo Kittilä (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies, 351–376. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Sally & Kaori Kabata
2007Crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns of the allative. Linguistic Typology 11(3). 451–514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sadler, Wesley
1964Untangled Bemba: A language of Northern Rhodesia, Central Africa. Kitwe: The United Church of Central Africa in Rhodesia.Google Scholar
Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten
2010The roles of benefactives and related notions in the typology of purpose clauses. In Fernando Zúñiga & Seppo Kittilä (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies, 121–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1996Applicatives and benefactives: A cognitive account. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning, 157–194. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Tomoko
2005Affectedness constructions: How languages indicate positive and negative events. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
Somers, Harold
1987Valency and case in computational linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung
2010Korean benefactive particles and their meanings. In Fernando Zúñiga & Seppo Kittilä (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies, 393–418. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teng, S.-H.
1975A semantic study of transitivity in Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert & Randy LaPolla
1997Syntax. Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Völlmin, Sascha
2010Benefactives and malefactives in Gumer (Gurage). In Fernando Zúñiga & Seppo Kittilä (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies, 317–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando
2011aThe grammar of benefaction: A crosslinguistic study. Zurich: University of Zurich Habilitation thesis.Google Scholar
2011bWhy should beneficiaries be subjects (or objects)? In S. Kittilä, K. Västi, and J. Ylikoski (eds.), Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles, 329–348. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar