Article published in:
Translation and Interpreting Pedagogy in Dialogue with Other Disciplines
Edited by Sonia Colina and Claudia V. Angelelli
[Benjamins Current Topics 90] 2017
► pp. 730
References

References

Angelelli, Claudia V.
2006 “Designing Curriculum for Healthcare Interpreting Education: A Principles Approach.” In New Approaches to Interpreter Education, ed. by Cynthia Roy, 23–46. Washington D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Beckner, Clay, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morten Christiansen, William Croft, Nick Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman, and Ton Schoenemann
2009 “Language as a Complex Adaptive System.” Language Learning 59 (Suppl. 1): 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. Douglas
1994Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Boston: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Capra, Fritjof
1997The Web of Life: A New Synthesis of Mind and Matter. London: Flamingo Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Brent
2004Inventions of Teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Davis, Brent, and Elaine Stimmt
2003 “Understanding Learning Systems: Mathematics Teaching and Complexity Science.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 34 (2): 137–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Brent, and Dennis Sumara
1997 “Cognition, Complexity, and Teacher Education.” Harvard Educational Review 67 (1): 105–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 “Curriculum Forms: On the Assumed Shapes of Knowing and Knowledge.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 32 (6): 821–845. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doll, William E.
1993A Postmodern Perspective on Curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
2008 “Complexity and the Culture of Curriculum.” In Complexity Theory and the Philosophy of Education, ed. by Mark Mason, 181–203. Malden, GA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, Stuart, and Hubert Dreyfus
1980 “A Five-Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in Directed Skill Acquisition.” http://​handle​.dtic​.mil​/100​.2​/ADA084551. Copyright: Approved for public release. Accessed 14 September 2013.
Ellis, Nick
1998 “Emergentism, Connectionism and Language Learning.” Language Learning 48 (4): 631–664. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
EMT Expert Group
2009 “Competences for Professional Translators, Experts in Multilingual and Multimedia Communication.” http://​ec​.europa​.eu​/dgs​/translation​/programmes​/emt​/key​_documents​/emt​_competences​_translators​_en​.pdf. Accessed 17 January 2015.
Göpferich, Susanne
2008Translationsprozessforschung [Translation Process Research]. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Hansen-Schirra, Silvia, and Don Kiraly
(eds) 2013Projekte und Projektionen in der translatorischen Kompetenzentwicklung. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiraly, Donald
2012 “Skopos Theory Goes to Paris: Purposeful Translation and Emergent Translation Projects.” MTM 4: 119–144.Google Scholar
2000A Social Constructivist Approach to Translator Education. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
1995Pathways to Translation: Pedagogy and Process. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1999Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane
2007 “On the Complementarity of Chaos/Complexity Theory and Dynamic Systems Theory in Understanding the Second Language Acquisition Process.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10 (1): 35–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Nancy S.
2004 “The Intersection of Postmodernity and Classroom Practice.” Teacher Education Quarterly. Summer: 119–134.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Rosemary, and Elina Nieminen
1997 “Motivating Students to Achieve Quality in Translation.” In Transferre Necesse Est, ed. by Kinga Klaudy, and Janós Kohn, 339–344. Budapest: Scholastica.Google Scholar
Maturana, Umberto, and Francisco Varela
1980Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Co. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrot, Benoît B.
1983The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: Henry Holt & Company.Google Scholar
Morçöl, Göktu
2001 “What is Complexity Science? Postmodernist or Postpositivist?Emergence 3 (1): 104–119  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
PACTE
2005 “Investigating Translation Competence: Conceptual and methodological issues.” Meta 50 (2): 609–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papert, Seymour
1993The Children’s Machine. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Richardson, Kurt, and Paul Cilliers
2001 “What is Complexity Science? A View from Different Directions.” Emergence 3 (1): 5–23.Google Scholar
Risku, Hanna
2010 “A Cognitive Scientific View on Technical Communication and Translation. Do Embodiment and Situatedness Really Make a Difference?Target 22 (1): 94–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Translatorische Kompetenz [Translation Competence]. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.Google Scholar
Sumara, Dennis, and Brent Davis
1997 “Enactivist Theory and Community Learning: Toward a Complexified Understanding of Action Research.” Educational Action Research 5 (3): 403–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Triche, Stephen, and Douglas McKnight
2004 “The Quest for Method: The Legacy of Peter Ramus.” History of Education 33 (1): 39–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trueit, Donna
2012Pragmatism, Postmodernism, and Complexity Theory. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Lier, Leo
2004The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varbelow, Sonja
2012 “Instruction, Curriculum and Society: Iterations Based on the Ideas of William Doll.” International Journal of Instruction 5 (1): 87–94.Google Scholar
Vienne, Jean
1994 “Toward a Pedagogy of ‘Translation in Situation.’Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 2 (1): 51–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, Warren
1948 “Science and Complexity.” American Scientist 36 (4): 536–544.Google Scholar