Article published in:
Current trends in analyzing syntactic variation
Edited by Ludovic De Cuypere, Clara Vanderschueren and Gert De Sutter
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31] 2017
► pp. 195218
References

References

Alexiadou, Artemis
2011 “Adjectival nominalizations: qualities and properties”. Paper presented at the Workshop on Nounhood and Adjectivehood , Barcelona, March 23–24th 2011.
2015 “Encoding properties: The case of English ‘nominalized’ adjectives”. Paper presented at Roots IV , NYU, June 29, 2015.
Bayer, Josef and Eleonore Brandner
2008 “On wh-head-movement and the doubly-filled-comp filter”. In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Charles B. Chang, and Hannah J. Haynie, 87–95. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Behaghel, Otto
1928Deutsche Syntax. Eine geschichtliche Darstellung. Band 3: Die Satzgebilde. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile
1950 “La phrase nominale”. Bulletin de la Societé Linguistique de Paris 46: 19–36.Google Scholar
1966Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Editions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred
1967 “Syntactic features in morphology: general problems of so-called pronominal inflection in German”. In To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, 239–270. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Blevins, James P.
1995 “Syncretism and Paradigmatic Opposition”. Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 113–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan
2012Universals in Comparative Morphology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boef, Eefje
2012Doubling in Relative Clauses. Aspects of Morphosyntactic Microvariation in Dutch. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Brandt, Patrick, and Eric Fuß
2014 “Most questionable pronouns: Variation between das- vs. was-relatives in German”. Linguistische Berichte 239, 297–329.Google Scholar
2016 Relativpronomenselektion und grammatische Variation: was vs das . in attributiven Relativsätzen. Ms., IDS Mannheim.Google Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans, and Evelien Keizer
2012Syntax of Dutch. Nouns and Noun Phrases. Volume 1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Citko, Barbara
2004 “On headed, headless, and light-headed relatives”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 95–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curme, George O.
1922A Grammar of the German Language. Second revised edition. [Ninth printing 1964]. New York: Ungar.Google Scholar
Cutting, Starr Willard
1902 “Concerning the Modern German relatives, „das“ and „was“, in clauses dependent upon substantivized adjectives.” The Decennial Publications of the University of Chicago, Vol. VII, 113–131. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Duden
2016Die Grammatik. 9th edition. Edited by Angelika Wöllstein, and the Duden editorial staff. Mannheim/Leipzig/Wien/ Zürich: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Fuß, Eric
2017 „Relativierungsverhalten und syntaktische Kategorie substantivierter Adjektive“. In Probleme der syntaktischen Kategorisierung: Einzelgänger, Außenseiter und mehr, ed. by S. Döring, and J. Geilfuß-Wolfgang. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther
2012 “Wh-movement as topic movement”. In Functional Heads: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 7, ed. by Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, and Cecilia Poletto, 55–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz
1993 “Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection”. In The View from Building 20, ed. by Kenneth Hale, and Samuel J. Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris
1997 “Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and Fission”. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30: PF: Papers At the Interface, ed. by B. Bruening, Y. Kang, and M. McGinnis, 425–450. Cambridge, Mass.: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi, and Elizabeth Ritter
2002 “Structuring the bundle: A universal morphosyntactic feature geometry.” In Pronouns – grammar and representation, ed. by Horst J. Simon, and Heike Wiese, 23–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heck, Fabian, and Juan Cuartero
2011 “Long distance agreement in relative clauses.” In Local Modelling of Non-Local Dependencies in Syntax, ed. by A. Alexiadou, T. Kiss, and G. Müller, 49–83. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Holler, Anke
2005Weiterführende Relativsätze. Empirische und theoretische Aspekte. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
2000 “From IF to IFF: Conditional perfection as pragmatic strenghtening.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 289–326 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kester, Ellen-Petra
1996aThe nature of adjectival Inflection. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
1996b “Adjectival inflection and the licensing of empty categories in DP.” Journal of Linguistics 32 (1): 57–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1973 “ ‘Elsewhere’ in phonology”. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. by S. Anderson, and P. Kiparsky, 93–106. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1982 “Word-formation and the lexicon”. In Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference, ed. by F. Ingemann. University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Murelli, Adriano
2012 “ Das Geheimnis, das oder was du mir verraten hast? – Das oder was als Relativpronomen”. In Grammatische Stolpersteine digital. Festschrift für Bruno Strecker zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. by M. Konopka, and R. Schneider, 145–152. Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache.Google Scholar
Sanders, Daniel
1879Deutsche Sprachbriefe. Berlin: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar
Sleeman, Petra
2013 “Deadjectival human nouns: conversion, nominal ellipsis, or mixed category?Linguística: revista de estudos linguísticos da Universidade do Porto 8: 159–180.Google Scholar
Wiese, Bernd
1999 “Unterspezifizierte Paradigmen. Form und Funktion in der pronominalen Deklination“. Linguistik Online 4 (http://​www​.linguistik​-online​.de​/3​_99)
2013Relativpronomina: Flexion und Wortfelder. Ms., IDS Mannheim.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2012 “There is only one way to agree”. The Linguistic Review 29: 491–539. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Upward Agree is superior. Ms., Unversity of Amsterdam.Google Scholar