A corpus-based analysis of pronoun choice in German relative
clauses
This paper investigates the conditions that govern the choice between the German
neuter singular relative pronouns das ‘that’ and
was ‘what’. We show that das requires a
lexical head noun, while in all other cases was is usually the
preferred option; therefore, the distribution of das and
was is most successfully captured by an approach that does
not treat was as an exception but analyzes it as the elsewhere
case that applies when the relativizer fails to pick up a lexical gender feature
from the head noun. We furthermore show how the non-uniform behavior of
different types of nominalized adjectives (positives allow both options, while
superlatives trigger was) can be attributed to semantic
differences rooted in syntactic structure. In particular, we argue that
superlatives select was due to the presence of a silent
counterpart of the quantifier alles ‘all’ that is part of the
superlative structure.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.
was as a default relativizer
- 2.1Analysis: Inherent gender features trigger das
- 2.1.1Syntax
- 2.1.2Spelling out RP
- 2.1.3Some further consequences of the analysis: wh-forms vs. d-forms
- 3.Beyond the basic generalization
- 3.1Distributive quantifiers: Cases of noun ellipsis
- 3.2Deadjectival nouns
- 3.2.1Anaphoric/elliptical readings
- 3.2.2Non-elliptical readings: Nominalized positives
- 3.2.3Non-elliptical readings: Nominalized superlatives
- 4.Semantics/pragmatics and choice between das vs. was
- 4.1Reference to objects as opposed to properties or propositional meanings
- 4.2Particularization by means of das vs. totalization by means of was
- 5.Concluding summary
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Alexiadou, Artemis
2011 “
Adjectival nominalizations: qualities and properties”. Paper presented at the
Workshop on Nounhood and Adjectivehood
, Barcelona, March 23–24th 2011.
Alexiadou, Artemis
2015 “
Encoding properties: The case of English ‘nominalized’ adjectives”. Paper presented at
Roots IV
, NYU, June 29, 2015.
Bayer, Josef and Eleonore Brandner
2008 “
On wh-head-movement and the doubly-filled-comp filter”. In
Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by
Charles B. Chang, and
Hannah J. Haynie, 87–95. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Behaghel, Otto
1928 Deutsche Syntax. Eine geschichtliche Darstellung. Band 3: Die Satzgebilde. Heidelberg: C. Winter.
Benveniste, Emile
1950 “
La phrase nominale”.
Bulletin de la Societé Linguistique de Paris 461: 19–36.
Benveniste, Emile
1966 Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Editions Gallimard.
Bierwisch, Manfred
1967 “
Syntactic features in morphology: general problems of so-called pronominal inflection in German”. In
To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, 239–270. The Hague: Mouton.
Blevins, James P.
1995 “
Syncretism and Paradigmatic Opposition”.
Linguistics and Philosophy 181: 113–152.
Bobaljik, Jonathan
2012 Universals in Comparative Morphology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Boef, Eefje
2012 Doubling in Relative Clauses. Aspects of Morphosyntactic Microvariation in Dutch. Utrecht: LOT.
Brandt, Patrick, and Eric Fuß
2014 “
Most questionable pronouns: Variation between das- vs. was-relatives in German”.
Linguistische Berichte 2391, 297–329.
Brandt, Patrick, and Eric Fuß
2016
Relativpronomenselektion und grammatische Variation: was vs das
.
in attributiven Relativsätzen. Ms., IDS Mannheim.
Broekhuis, Hans, and Evelien Keizer
2012 Syntax of Dutch. Nouns and Noun Phrases. Volume 1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Citko, Barbara
2004 “
On headed, headless, and light-headed relatives”.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 221: 95–126.
Curme, George O.
1922 A Grammar of the German Language. Second revised edition. [
Ninth printing 1964]. New York: Ungar.
Cutting, Starr Willard
1902 “
Concerning the Modern German relatives, „das“ and „was“, in clauses dependent upon substantivized adjectives.”
The Decennial Publications of the University of Chicago, Vol. VII1, 113–131. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Duden
2016 Die Grammatik. 9th edition. Edited by
Angelika Wöllstein, and the Duden editorial staff. Mannheim/Leipzig/Wien/ Zürich: Dudenverlag.
Fuß, Eric
2017 „
Relativierungsverhalten und syntaktische Kategorie substantivierter Adjektive“. In
Probleme der syntaktischen Kategorisierung: Einzelgänger, Außenseiter und mehr, ed. by
S. Döring, and
J. Geilfuß-Wolfgang. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Grewendorf, Günther
2012 “
Wh-movement as topic movement”. In
Functional Heads: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 7, ed. by
Laura Brugé,
Anna Cardinaletti,
Giuliana Giusti,
Nicola Munaro, and
Cecilia Poletto, 55–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz
1993 “
Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection”. In
The View from Building 20, ed. by
Kenneth Hale, and
Samuel J. Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Halle, Morris
1997 “
Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and Fission”. In
MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30: PF: Papers At the Interface, ed. by
B. Bruening,
Y. Kang, and
M. McGinnis, 425–450. Cambridge, Mass.: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
Harley, Heidi, and Elizabeth Ritter
Heck, Fabian, and Juan Cuartero
2011 “
Long distance agreement in relative clauses.” In
Local Modelling of Non-Local Dependencies in Syntax, ed. by
A. Alexiadou,
T. Kiss, and
G. Müller, 49–83. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Holler, Anke
2005 Weiterführende Relativsätze. Empirische und theoretische Aspekte. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Horn, Laurence R.
2000 “
From IF to IFF: Conditional perfection as pragmatic strenghtening.”
Journal of Pragmatics 321: 289–326
Kester, Ellen-Petra
1996a The nature of adjectival Inflection. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
Kester, Ellen-Petra
1996b “
Adjectival inflection and the licensing of empty categories in DP.”
Journal of Linguistics 32 (1): 57–78.
Kiparsky, Paul
1973 “
‘Elsewhere’ in phonology”. In
A Festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. by
S. Anderson, and
P. Kiparsky, 93–106. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Kiparsky, Paul
1982 “
Word-formation and the lexicon”. In
Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference, ed. by
F. Ingemann. University of Kansas.
Murelli, Adriano
2012 “
Das Geheimnis, das oder was du mir verraten hast? – Das oder was als Relativpronomen”. In
Grammatische Stolpersteine digital. Festschrift für Bruno Strecker zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. by
M. Konopka, and
R. Schneider, 145–152. Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache.
Sanders, Daniel
1879 Deutsche Sprachbriefe. Berlin: Langenscheidt.
Sleeman, Petra
2013 “
Deadjectival human nouns: conversion, nominal ellipsis, or mixed category?”
Linguística: revista de estudos linguísticos da Universidade do Porto 81: 159–180.
Wiese, Bernd
1999 “
Unterspezifizierte Paradigmen. Form und Funktion in der pronominalen Deklination“.
Linguistik Online 41 (
[URL])
Wiese, Bernd
2013 Relativpronomina: Flexion und Wortfelder. Ms., IDS Mannheim.
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2012 “
There is only one way to agree”.
The Linguistic Review 291: 491–539.
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2013 Upward Agree is superior. Ms., Unversity of Amsterdam.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Moltmann, Friederike
2022.
Names, Light Nouns, and Countability.
Linguistic Inquiry 54:1
► pp. 117 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.