Article published in:
The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 5265
References

References

Backus, Ad
2009 “Codeswitching as One Piece of the Puzzle of Language Change: The case of Turkish yapmak .” In Multidisciplinary Approaches to Code-switching, ed. by Ludmila Isurin, Donald Winford, and Kees De Bot, 307–336. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Backus, Ad, and Margreet Dorleijn
2009 “Loan Translations versus Code-Switching.” The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Code-switching, ed. by Barbara Bullock, and Almeida Jacqueline Toribio, 75–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Hans C.
2009The Life and Death of Texas German. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Dux, Ryan
2017 “Classifying Language Contact Phenomena: English Verbs in Texas German.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics 29 (4): 377–428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Texas German and English Word Order Constructions in Contact.” In Constructions in Contact, ed. by Hans C. Boas, and Steffen Höder, 211–249. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Höder, Steffen
2018 “Grammar is Community-Specific: Background and Basic Concepts of Diasystematic Construction Grammar.” In Constructions in Contact, ed. by Hans C. Boas, and Steffen Höder, 37–70. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar